RobMoore
Member
Buy the maglula pistol mag loader and you won't take so long.
I'm sure the 9mm was easier to shoot....it's a weaker caliber.So, long story short, I shot the G23 just fine today, but the G19 was like magic. Very fast follow up shots, VERY accurate rapid fire, and while I don't mind the G23's recoil, the 9 is noticeably less and seems quicker for follow up.
You might want to check around first...., but seeing as how I don't yet have a 9mm, AND thinking I might want to have one since ammo is readily available, I'm probably gonna pick one up.
You might want to check around first.
Around here I'm still seeing .40 and .357Sig, but I haven't seen .380, 9mm, or .45 ammo on the shelves in a quite a while.
Thanks, how much faster is it than the stocker...?Southpaw: Get an uplula reloader. You won't believe how fast it can pump 18 rds into a mag with a little practice--and no sore fingers.
But here's the problem....As far as feeling "under gunned", with my xDm, I feel quite confident with my 19+1 rounds of Federal HP's. I love my .45 and .357 but with the firepower that my 9mm can put out from only one magazine, I feel pretty darn good if I need to grab it in a pinch.
Valid points, but my xD has over 3000 rounds with ZERO malfunctions. My 1911 has had about 4-5 FTE's out of 650. Now like you said, if only one shot gets out of the barrel it might as well be a big one... But the chances of my 9mm failing given it's track record, is minimal at best. Either way, I use a .357 wheelgun as my CC and bedside gun. Reliability with capacity as a trade off...But here's the problem....
When using a semi, with a round in the chamber, you're about 99.99% likely to get off at least the first shot without any type of malfunction.
But you might experience a failure-to-eject or failure-to-load or some other malfunction on the second loading/shot.
Personally, I would rather that all important first shot be a .40, .45, or .357Sig than a 9mm.
Just something to think about.
When using a semi, with a round in the chamber, you're about 99.99% likely to get off at least the first shot without any type of malfunction.
But you might experience a failure-to-eject or failure-to-load or some other malfunction on the second loading/shot.
Actually, I don't think the odds of an auto malfunctioning are all that slim at all.Yes and I might get struck by lightning or hit by a stray bullet. The odds of an automatic, that has proven itself extremely reliable, malfunctioning at the exact moment I need it are so slim that its worth disregarding that fear in order to reap the benefits of the technology.
Honestly, I have to side with Ben. The benefits of an automatic firearm (especially a reliable one) greatly outnumber the risk of a malfunction. Life is all about playing the odds, and the odds of the above mentioned indefinitely in your favor of it going bang when you pull the trigger.Actually, I don't think the odds of an auto malfunctioning are all that slim at all.
There's a very good reason that those who use autos to seek and eliminate the bad guys also routinely, and frequently, practice malfunction drills.
Take 20 guys with semi's to the range on any given day and I'll bet that at least one of them will have at least one malfunction when shooting, be it ammo related, magazine related, weapon related, or user related.
The LE/military argument is fallacious for a number of reasons. For one thing, LE/military personnel often have more than one weapon on them and they often also have other personnel to cover them. (You said "automatic" but I am sure you meant "semi-automatic".)The benefits of an automatic firearm (especially a reliable one) greatly outnumber the risk of a malfunction. Life is all about playing the odds, and the odds of the above mentioned indefinitely in your favor of it going bang when you pull the trigger. Otherwise LE and Military would be using revolvers and bolt-action rifles... Exclusively.