Snubster
Member
I've been primarily a revolver person since I started shooting, but the allure of the semi-autos have also always called me to them.
I recently got a new Glock 26 (9mm, sub-compact) and got to try it out at the range for the first time yesterday. I had a malfunction on the 3rd round on the first mag (stovepiped round sticking straight up). A tap/rack did not immediately clear it for me. I had to drop the mag and work the slide. That was the only problematic round in 210 that I fired yesterday.
Now, I have other semi-autos that have been 100% since I got them. But, I also have a few that malfunction once in a rare while. Since the proper functioning of a semi-auto is so dependent on ammo, I just can't mentally get past the idea that a semi-auto may malfunction when I need it most.
So, obviously, I should be practicing drills to clear malfunctions for my semi-autos, but always, in the back of my head, I just don't know if I'll have the time in a real encounter.
Not to say I haven't had malfunctions with revolvers. I've had more than a few ejector rods unscrew on me while shooting my older S&Ws. But my revolver malfunctions are far and few between.
I envision most defense scenarios would involve pretty close distances and therefore speed to action is pretty important. If I have a malfunction on a semi-auto, will I really have time to clear the gun? (I know there's no universal answer to this.)
So, I'm thinking maybe it wouldn't be bad to carry both a revolver and a semi-auto at the same time, and maybe even making the revolver (which in my case is currently a Ruger SP101) the primary. Then, my G26 can be (essentially) my BUG, or gun I can go to if the particular defense scenario involves greater distances or time isn't quite as essential as something within really close quarters (or I run out of rounds in the snubbie, NY reload).
Just curious what other people's thoughts are (or if any of my thinking is illogical)...
Edited to add: Part of the problem is that I was surprised how well I shot the G26 yesterday. I'm usually not too bad with a snubbie, but I was able to shoot the Glock much more accurately at longer distances and the recoil was very minimal.
I recently got a new Glock 26 (9mm, sub-compact) and got to try it out at the range for the first time yesterday. I had a malfunction on the 3rd round on the first mag (stovepiped round sticking straight up). A tap/rack did not immediately clear it for me. I had to drop the mag and work the slide. That was the only problematic round in 210 that I fired yesterday.
Now, I have other semi-autos that have been 100% since I got them. But, I also have a few that malfunction once in a rare while. Since the proper functioning of a semi-auto is so dependent on ammo, I just can't mentally get past the idea that a semi-auto may malfunction when I need it most.
So, obviously, I should be practicing drills to clear malfunctions for my semi-autos, but always, in the back of my head, I just don't know if I'll have the time in a real encounter.
Not to say I haven't had malfunctions with revolvers. I've had more than a few ejector rods unscrew on me while shooting my older S&Ws. But my revolver malfunctions are far and few between.
I envision most defense scenarios would involve pretty close distances and therefore speed to action is pretty important. If I have a malfunction on a semi-auto, will I really have time to clear the gun? (I know there's no universal answer to this.)
So, I'm thinking maybe it wouldn't be bad to carry both a revolver and a semi-auto at the same time, and maybe even making the revolver (which in my case is currently a Ruger SP101) the primary. Then, my G26 can be (essentially) my BUG, or gun I can go to if the particular defense scenario involves greater distances or time isn't quite as essential as something within really close quarters (or I run out of rounds in the snubbie, NY reload).
Just curious what other people's thoughts are (or if any of my thinking is illogical)...
Edited to add: Part of the problem is that I was surprised how well I shot the G26 yesterday. I'm usually not too bad with a snubbie, but I was able to shoot the Glock much more accurately at longer distances and the recoil was very minimal.