Ignorance behind "Shot placement is key" fallacy.

[TarDevil]

You cannot tell the difference between , "Non-blood loss induced loss of consciousness stops" and "an attacker loses consciousness with no blood loss"?

LMBO!

Well, my goodness, that certainly clears it up.

(NOT!)

 

[TarDevil]

I think you'll have better success arguing "Thumb lever type manual firing inhibitor" is the right term to use.

I'll never get to sleep now! ROTFLMBO!

danez, that's a keeper!

 

[strambo]

I checked back in because I thought this thread was headed somewhere productive...last post before the lock I guess.

My wife just got her first tattoo and experienced non-blood loss induced unconsciousness, not sure if the tattoo gun had a HP needle or not?

 

[Nom de Forum]

Strambo was that a tattoo sufficient in penetration to be effective? Usually a little blood is spilled when getting a tattoo. Your wife may need a refund or re-do.

 

[danez71]

I checked back in because I thought this thread was headed somewhere productive...last post before the lock I guess.

My wife just got her first tattoo and experienced non-blood loss induced unconsciousness, not sure if the tattoo gun had a HP needle or not?

Or did she "lose(s) consciousness with no blood loss"?

And that's what he did with "Thumb lever type manual firing inhibitor". Say something unsupported and then argue wording and semantics rather than topic.

What I can say from experience is that any OP and any forum that uses the following phrases never turns into a productive thread.

Ignorant people keep talking .......

So, the FACT OF THE MATTER.......

 

[9mmepiphany]

I think we've gone long enough with this, I guess folks weren't really ready to discuss the OP in a High Road fashion