Cooper is very specific about "all guns are always loaded" and has addressed it (Google "cooper's commentaries" and related terms). He is trying to stay away from the "let's pretend" wink-and-nod terminology of "treat every gun..." and replaces it with an imperative: it's a gun, it's dangerous, and it's loaded unless you have personally and immediately checked it yourself.
If he wants to stay away from "let's pretend" wink-and-nod rules, he might try one that doesn't require a google search to discover what it is that the rule is actually telling you to do.
Also, "All guns are always loaded"
is not an imperative. An imperative is a command or order that tells you what to do, and in some cases when to do it and what to do it to. Cooper's Rule 1 does none of those things.
Anyway, a google search turned up the following:
RULE 1
ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED
The only exception to this occurs when one has a weapon in his hands and he has personally unloaded it for checking. As soon as he puts it down, Rule 1 applies again.
So, if I personally unload a gun, I can then disregard rule one entirely? I can treat an unloaded gun as carelessly as I want? (Actually, no, since rule one tells you nothing about how to treat any gun.)
1. All guns are always loaded.
An unloaded gun is useless, and no one should ever assume that any piece he may see or touch is not ready to fire. Would that we would never again hear the plaintive wail, "I didn't know it was loaded!" Of course, it was loaded. That is why it exists. Treat it so!
Parse through that to look for a directive (or an imperative, if you prefer that term) and all you find is "Treat it so!" Treat what how? Treat <the gun> <like it is loaded>. Sound familiar?
We were panned recently by a reader who claimed that of our four rules, Rule 1 is not a rule but rather a statement. "All guns are always loaded" is, as our man said, not a guide to conduct, but rather a statement of condition. The criticism is correct, but we are not going to change our rules on that account. We think that "treat all guns as if they were loaded" implies with the "as if" qualification a dangerous choice of assumptions. The four basic rules of safety may not be structurally perfect, but we intend to leave them the way they are.
Even the Colonel admits that his rule is not a rule but a statement, he just won't change it.
While it is true that "treat all guns as if they were loaded"
does imply that a gun can in fact be in an unloaded state, the "as if" is not a qualifiaction, nor does it allow for any choices or assumptions. "Treat all guns as if they were loaded" implies that you must treat all guns as if they were loaded
regardless of whether they are loaded or not. To do otherwise is to violate the rule.