Illinois Newspaper actually gets it

Status
Not open for further replies.

DonP

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,294
Location
Chicago area
I found this column in the local Star (Illinois) papers.

Imagine a journalist that actually did some research!

At the same time he found out that the people espousing the Illinois AWB had no idea what they are talking about. But that doesn't stop them from advocating for the ban.

You can read the whole thing here:

http://www.starnewspapers.com/star/spedit/bowers/x21-bow.htm

Here's the introduction ...

(clip)

The myth of the easy machine gun


Sunday, May 21, 2006



A ban on assault rifles, pushed by the mayor of Chicago and our governor, is moldering in the state House Rules Committee. Lawmakers can take no action until they reconvene in October. And even then, there's little chance supporters can pick up the three additional votes they need to send the bill to the Senate.

But like the villain at the end of a movie, the assault rifle ban never dies. It's just wounded, waiting to come back when you're not looking. So I thought I would look into the validity of its major argument. That is, this notion that it's easy to convert a semi-automatic rifle (legal) into a fully automatic rifle (illegal), also known as a machine gun (illegal).

I've been following the debate. One point always seems to go unexplained. Once some concerned police chief declares that semi-automatic rifles are dangerously easy to convert, the discussion leaps elsewhere. No details of the conversion task are forthcoming.

So I called a spokesman for Gov. Blagojevich in Chicago. Could you explain, I asked. How do you do this job anyway? Do you need a screwdriver? A power drill? How long does it take? Could the governor's office be a little more explicit about the mechanics of the threat?

I gave the helpful spokesman a day to do a little research, then called back. He told me had learned the root of the problem is the "conversion kit," something that allows you to replace a certain part in the rifle and make it a machine gun.

I see. Do you know the name of this part? He didn't. In fact, as he readily acknowledged, he knew almost nothing about guns at all. Not that there's anything wrong with that. He did tell me: "It's very easy if you follow the instructions."

The spokesman added that the conversion kits are illegal in Illinois. Well, then, where do you get one? They are probably available at gun dealers in states with looser gun laws, he suggested.

I thanked the good fellow and went on a search for a "machine gun conversion kit." I looked all through Shotgun News, the bible for gun buyers and sellers. Didn't see a single conversion kit. If you can't find a gun item in Shotgun News, you can't find it anywhere.

But this fat magazine is packed with ads, many set in small type. It's possible the kit was there and I failed to recognize it. So I moved on to Google. Alas, still no conversion kit. But wait — there is a booklet called "The Ultimate SKS Full Auto Plans" by M&M Engineering. Aha! I thought, purely academically. Now I'm good to go.

But, not quite. The booklet costs $10. It's 32 small pages. The illustrations are fuzzy, the instructions are vague and the necessary tasks appear to require machine tools, which, in case you did not know, are not cheap. A nicely equipped 16x40-inch lathe from Grizzly Industrial in Springfield, Mo., costs $6,400.

For me to make sense of this booklet and produce a reliable machine gun would be about as likely as my persuading one of the Bush twins to spend next weekend with me.

Nevertheless, let me give you an idea of what is involved, so that you can be informed the next time that a gun-banner tries to frighten you.

First off, you have to buy a rifle. I chose the M&M Engineering booklet specific to the SKS, which I understand to be the Chinese version of the AK-47. The SKS is reliable, abundant and cheap, at $175 or less. So it sounds like just the thing for a city thug, doesn't it?

Now you are ready to transform your SKS into a street sweeper. Stay with me: So far you have done nothing illegal. Except for some parts of the country, such as the city of Chicago, the SKS is legal in its semi-automatic version. What's illegal is the fully automatic version of the gun: a machine gun.

(continued)

(clip)

Good read and an honest assessment of this kind of foolishness the gun banners stand for.

Here's his e-mail address if you feel like writing, I already did.

Send email to [email protected]
 
Great read. Thanks for sharing it. What was really amazing is that it seems from the writing that the author really doesn't know a thing about guns; but still took time to educate himself instead of letting himself be spoonfed a bunch of lies.

We spend a lot of time complaining about anti-gun editorials and even linking to them (which trains the newspaper that "anti-gun editorials = ad revenue"). Let's be sure to take a few moments to train this newspaper that honest stories on gun use = ad revenue.

http://www.starnewspapers.com/star/spedit/bowers/x21-bow.htm
 
Super article and very refreshing to see some actual RESEARCH rather than an old VPC 'cut and paste' job.

Sent him an email congratulating him on a great article.
 
Super article and very refreshing to see some actual RESEARCH rather than an old VPC 'cut and paste' job.

Make no mistake: VPC has[/i] done its research. You don't really think they're as stupid as they seem to anyone with a fifth-grade understanding of social studies and firearm mechanics, do you?

VPC leftists are not stupid. They want you to develop fear of the horrific hypotheticals they propound, as preposterous as these might be. They want you to believe guns are evil. And they will repeat themselves as many times as it takes to get you to listen, yelling a bit louder and making their fantastically-conceived "consequences" of firearms ownership a bit more horrific each time. (Note: I mean "you" in general).

They know better, and really don't care. Their mission is to get the citizens of America disarmed, period.
 
Good article.

He thinks the SKS is just "The Chinese version of the AK 47" though.

Still, good article.
 
Has anyone considered inviting him to THR where he could learn more?

Not to learn how to make a machine gun but to learn more about what's legal and not and the hoops one has to jump through with NFA weapons.
 
Actually, it is fantastically easy to convert any semi-automatic weapon into a reliable machine gun, assuming you have the resources.

All it takes is several engineers, machinists, machine tools, machine stock, a couple dozen weapons to burn during firing trials, a tendency for breaking laws, vast piles of money (in the realm of thousands and thousands of dollars) to pay for the engineers, machinists, machine tools, machine stock, a couple dozen weapons to burn during firing trials, and the lawer to try to keep your butt out of jail.

As easy as this may seem, it is actually even easier and cheaper to obtain perfectly legal machine guns. That will cost a few thousand dollars less and won't result in going to jail and hanging out with Mr. You-Dropped-the-Soap at the penitentiary.
 
Otherguy, just did. I sent him an email telling him how nice it was for someone in the media to actually "think" about the issue instead of blindly following in fear of the unknown. He replied and I sent him a freindly link to the thread. Being from IL it's nice to see something gun related that makes sense.:rolleyes:
 
I invited him over too.

I told him that I had posted clips of his column on some gun boards and mentioned this one specifically.

So everyone be nice to any new folks that show up asking basic questions. (I know, we always are nice, even to the Euro Trash we had trolling the board a year or two ago.)

I told him not to be too surprised if his suburban Chicago column winds up generating letters from around the country and the state. Illinois has around 1.5 million gun owners and with the Daley/Blago conglomerate still awaiting trial, we appreciate all the support an dhonesty we can find.

He submitted my response letter to his column to his editor for possible publication.

The Star publishes twice a week, Thursday and Sunday.

I'll watch for any follow up letters, mine or otherwise.
 
I wrote him as well - here is my letter.

Mr. Bowers,

My family is from the Chicago area, and I wanted to thank you for writing your wonderful article titled "The myth of the easy machine gun". You article was clear, precise, and to the point - the point being that the people making gun laws know nothing about firearms, and that as a result we legislate based on wrong or even outright fraudulent information. My favorite part of the article was:

"I see. Do you know the name of this part? He didn't. In fact, as he readily acknowledged, he knew almost nothing about guns at all. Not that there's anything wrong with that. He did tell me: "It's very easy if you follow the instructions.""

It is legal in most states to own a machine gun as a private citizen, provided one passes a background check. It is interesting to note that of the several hundred thousand legal machine guns and assault rifles in private hands, only one (1!) has ever been used in a crime - and that was by a Dayton, Ohio police officer using his department-issue fully automatic weapon to perform a contract killing.

A good handbook for journalists that you may be interested in is Gun Facts v4.0. It has an excellent section on "assault weapons", and it's located at

http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/4.0/GunFacts4-0-Screen.pdf

Your article is receiving glowing praise on several gun discussion boards, notably The High Road (www.thehighroad.org). A more knowledgeable, polite, and easy going group of gun owners cannot be found online. I am sure that your presence there would be welcomed.

Have a great day!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top