Many of the NRA's courses are basic/intro level, true. If you are saying that they stop short of an ideal full education, and should be followed up with more advanced courses, then I agree. But NRA intro courses don't "suck" any more than grade school "sucks" because they don't teach thermodynamics.
Agreed...as a first safety course, Home Firearms Safety is an overwhelming success.
***
I wasted two days in Basic Pistol AND WAS NOT A BETTER SHOOTER FOR THE EXPERIENCE. Many other students expressed dissatisfaction. I also taught the course until I took a two day defensive course.
Except for their safety course, they really are bad. I have seen all sorts of inefficient techniques (the cup grip comes to mind) taught there. Myths passed on, and so forth. During the instructor course, other instructor candidates even started getting upset at what was being taught. They wanted the certificate though, so they gritted their teeth and finished the training course.
THE NOTION THAT ACHIEVING PROFICIENCY IN GUNFIGHTING TAKES YEARS IS A FALLACY. This is not a martial art such as karate; those skills require years of dedicated practice to perfect. I am purposefully excluding combatives and knifing (though it can be argued you only need as few as five combatives moves). The reason proficiency takes so long is that most of us don't focus on it. We take a course here and there; in the mean time our skills degrade in a two steps forward, one and a half back sort of way. I'm guilty of this as I have failed to retain proficiency in carbine CQB techniques. We have to choose the skills and for people who carry, that means pistol shooting with some light combatives and knifing thrown in. It certainly doesn't take a black belt in Gun-Fu to index the slide on a goblin's torso and pull the trigger a
few times while moving off the line of attack.
Education and learning to shoot/learning fighting skills do NOT correlate. It takes years of foundation to get to the point where someone can contemplate taking a thermodynamics class. Shooting, and fighting, take the body's inherent ability and instinct and direct them toward a particular set of activities.
For example, at FPF Training's DHS 1 course (16 hours), I watched a woman with three hours experience (from the week before) go from UNABLE to draw, move, shoot, and hit to competency in under two days. That is, she had learned how to draw a handgun from concealment with moderate speed, was able to move off the line of force, and could place shots on target in a three to six inch groups on demand. Imagine what she could have done in another four days.
The NRA courses are insufficient because they are hampered by their desire to avoid offending any potential new members. The courses are (or were) primarily focused on safety, but fail in their execution of the actual skill of shooting. Forget learning anything about fighting. Somehow, states accept this as "proficient" for the purposes of licensing. Many people never go farther.
However, that does not mean the NRA courses don't have their place. They do--at the very bottom. I have advocated, for years, their safety course because it is comprehensive and focused. The students really do learn that there is a tube where a cartridge goes in one end and how to get it out. This is a very important skill and serves to "immunize" them of fear. However, their other courses are lacking in the area that is needed most: shooting and fighting. Their Personal Protection in the Home is...well, I won't go there.
So, yeah, take one of these courses with the intention of getting good training elsewhere. There are hundreds of schools across the country that provide decent training at an affordable price. Seek them out; you may find a great school in your area.