Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Info on Beretta 96 Brigadier Inox.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by rec999allis, Jan 24, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rec999allis

    rec999allis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2005
    Messages:
    57
    Location:
    South Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    I am looking at getting my first semi-auto and right now it's between a Beretta 96 Brigadier Inox or a Smith and Wesson 1911 stainless steel with wood grips. My question is to anyone that owns or has owned one of the two or both, what would be a better investment? If you know of a semi-auto that is of better quality then either one of these, could you let me know. The price I am willing to spend is up to $1,000. I just want to make sure I get the most bang for the buck.
     
  2. Highland Ranger

    Highland Ranger Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    New Jersey Highlands
    what's it for?

    target?

    self defense?

    ?
     
  3. rec999allis

    rec999allis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2005
    Messages:
    57
    Location:
    South Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Info on Beretta Brigadier Inox.

    I would use it for both self defense and target shooting.
     
  4. Alan Fud

    Alan Fud Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,444
    Location:
    Sol-III
    Funny, you should ask this now. I just recently picked up an Inox Beretta 96 Brigadier and it is an excellent gun. I'm a big fan of S&W autoloaders and own over a dozen of them (5906, 4006, 4506, 3913, 4013, 4513, etc.) but I would definitely recommend the Inox Beretta 96 Brigadier.
     
  5. Black Majik

    Black Majik Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    5,031
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    Well, I personally dont like the .40S&W caliber, so of course my vote would be to the 1911.

    For the $1000 price mark, there are numerous 1911's that you should/can consider. S&W, Colt, Kimber, and Springfield all make great 1911's under the 1K price.

    If you're dead set on getting the S&W, go for it. I've heard great reviews and the ones I've fondled and oogled over have left me with a smile.

    btw, is the Beretta with the Black controls and plastic parts? That might be something to look into also. if you REALLY want a Beretta, get one with all metal INOX parts with a straight dustcover.

    Happy hunting! :)
     
  6. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    Greeting's All-

    I'm with my friend Richard on this one, as I don't care much for the
    .40S&W caliber~!:( I'm also a fan of the 1911 .45's, and currently looking
    to add a Springfield Loaded MC Operator to my inventory.:cool: :D
     
  7. BerettaNut92

    BerettaNut92 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,724
    Getting a Beretta in .40 is kind of like, well, a 1911 in .40.
     
  8. Old Dog

    Old Dog Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,746
    Location:
    somewhere on Puget Sound
    I dunno ... I'm startin' to like the 96 as my reg'lar shootin' buddy has let me crank quite a few rounds downrange with his, and, for a .40 S&W platform, it seems to compare favorably to my SIG 226 (which I believe to be the best .40 pistol made) ...

    That said, I'd get BOTH a Beretta (but the 92FS in 9mm) AND a 1911 (but a Springfield, Kimber or Colt) in .45 ... You could probably find a NIB 92FS (blue) and a new SA Mil-Spec and still come in right around $1000 ...
     
  9. rec999allis

    rec999allis Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2005
    Messages:
    57
    Location:
    South Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Thanks for the comments. I think I will look more into the 1911s. I like springfield's 1911s as well as the S&W. The gun shop that I do buissness with dose not carry Kimber anymore. Just Springfield and S&W 1911s. But I like both of these over the Kimbers anyway.
     
  10. Skofnung

    Skofnung Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,135
    Location:
    Atlanta Area
    JMO

    My first autoloader purchace when I came of age was a Beretta 96.
    I had owned (or did own at the time) a 1911, a S&W N frame revolver, and a BHP.

    Long story short, I got rid of the 96. That gun soured me on the .40 S&W.

    Perhaps I got a lemon, but I couldn't hit well with it. With all my other guns (again, .45, full house .357 mags, and 9mm) I was able to keep all of my shots on a playing card at 21 feet. With my 96, I was lucky to get saucer sized groups at that range... slow fire. I handed it off to better shots than I, and it was the same story.

    On the plus side, it never jammed and it looked cool as all get out.

    YMMV
     
  11. iamagashman

    iamagashman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    1911 or 96

    I must break with the majority here. I've owned and shot many types of pistols and I just recently purchased my second Beretta 96 (both are the 96 Vertec Inox Police Specials) in 3 months. The pistol will shoot 3 1/2" groups at 50 yards with 165gr FMJ. A 1911 that is not compensated or ported will not do that kind of grouping. I do like my Springfield but the 96 is my tool for the trade. (JM2C)
     
  12. nemoaz

    nemoaz member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2006
    Messages:
    575
    I agree with the Beretta accuracy comment. My 96 was one of the most accurate pistols I've ever shot. I think it is the longer sight radius though. It sure wasn't the DAO trigger I had on mine.

    The thing I DIDN'T like was that the frame is very large yet only holds 11 rounds of .40. :(
     
  13. iamagashman

    iamagashman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    96...

    Yeah, the DAO is something to get used to. My S&W5946, FN Forty-Nine, and Beretta 8040F are DAO but are smooth as ice once their broken in. The FN is the poly of the group and is a nice shooter but the LEO mags are tough to locate. Well, at least the DAO is 3/16ths of an inch slimmer... :scrutiny:
     
  14. gudel

    gudel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,947
    Location:
    United States
    get the beretta, it'll be more reliable, light years ahead.
     
  15. Ethereal

    Ethereal Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    274
    Location:
    Kent, Washington
    Finding a holster might be difficult if you're in a hurry, but in the long run if you took the brigadier over the smith I think you would be pleased. It's one of the more unique variants that you don't see everyday, and I wish I had picked up my share of oddball 92's or 96's before they disappeared. You can always find a 1911 "clone" somewhere, but a discontinued Beretta will be pretty hard to come by in the future.
     
  16. briansp82593

    briansp82593 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,034
    Location:
    Liberty MO
    get the inox dude i have one, first gun, and will be my last. i know it will last longer than me, and its pretty accurate.
     
  17. MT GUNNY

    MT GUNNY Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,450
    Location:
    Kalispell MT
    The first pistol I bought was a 96

    I loved it , then stupidly traded it for a S&W 1911 and i love it to!!
    Then after a couple years reacuired a 96 just like i previiosly had,
    never again will i trade off a gun I like.

    Anyway both very reliable pistols!!
     
  18. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    Of the 40's I have owned, the 96 is the nicest -- one to the Beretta
    Of the 1911's out there, I'm just not feeling the warm & fuzzies w/ the 1911 from S&W -- another one to th Beretta
    I'm not a fan of the 40 S&W -- one to the S&W

    Which would I go w/ ---personally -- probably the 96 Brigadier ;)
     
  19. golden

    golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,071
    BERETTA is my choice

    I would take the BERETTA hands down. It is extremely accurate. As reliable as a GLOCK and very well made.
     
  20. Koblenz

    Koblenz Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Messages:
    177
    Location:
    southwest Atlanta suburbs
    It was the Glock 23 and +p+ ammo that soured me on the .40 S&W. Then I bought a S&W 4006, and what a world of difference there was in recoil and handling. The 4006 is as easy to shoot and handle as most any 9mm or .45, which is more than I can say for any of the other .40 pistols I have fired.
     
  21. 1BLINDREF

    1BLINDREF Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,333
    Location:
    SE Pennsylvania
    I'd suggest the 96 if its your first bottom feeder. It'll be more reliable and less complicated than a 1911. You might want to consider getting a 92 instead.
    9mm ammo is much cheaper to shoot than .40S&W which will give you more trigger time for your dime. With the Beretta you'd also have some extra $$ left over for ammo.

    IMG_2862.jpg
     
  22. dstark

    dstark Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    126
    Location:
    CA
    The beretta 96 was the first pistol I bought. I was very disapointed in it, having shot a few hundred rounds I found it very picky on ammo and not very accurate. The grip felt huge and hard to control, and I have big hands.
    I would recommend shooting both first. So I bought an XD, sold the 96 and coudn't be happier.
     
  23. The Mayor

    The Mayor Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    98
    Location:
    An Island 2000 miles off the coast of California
    Its weird how a post started two years ago can still have wheels.
    I thought for a minute there I might have a buyer for my Brigadier, I guess I'll never be able to say I wish I didn't sell it.

    jan07061.gif

    jan07062.gif
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page