Busta Prima
Member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2006
- Messages
- 63
I was planning on waiting for the XD-45 to come out in stainless. I'm a little tired of the holster (and other ) wear a blued gun shows after a while. Springfield's Armory Coat, Glock's Tennifer, standard gun bluing . . . they all get it.
I decided on the two tone because while looking at a NEW store XD-45 with their black "melonite" finish, I noticed some bare spots from being handled and shown to customers.
I contacted SA with my concerns and they responded that the gun must not have been properly cared for. The went on to say that while stainless steel might not show holster and handling wear, it is softer than the carbon steel used in non SS guns. They said the stainless was surely strong enough for the application but that it was still made of a softer steel than the "black" or "blued" guns.
So . . . how many of you have seen stainless guns wear out faster than their carbon counterparts? I always thought stainless was superior all the way around. I didn't know there was a trade-off.
Facts on this anyone?
I decided on the two tone because while looking at a NEW store XD-45 with their black "melonite" finish, I noticed some bare spots from being handled and shown to customers.
I contacted SA with my concerns and they responded that the gun must not have been properly cared for. The went on to say that while stainless steel might not show holster and handling wear, it is softer than the carbon steel used in non SS guns. They said the stainless was surely strong enough for the application but that it was still made of a softer steel than the "black" or "blued" guns.
So . . . how many of you have seen stainless guns wear out faster than their carbon counterparts? I always thought stainless was superior all the way around. I didn't know there was a trade-off.
Facts on this anyone?