BruiseLee
Member
I've never owned a Sig, but a few of my friends do. So, I've got to shoot the P226, P228, P229, and a couple of .45 P220's. I was able to shoot all very well - even better than the Glocks I own. I liked them a lot.
I was thinking the Sig Pro might be a good option for me. I have no problem with the classic Sig's SA/DA trigger. I've own 4 polymer framed Glocks, and shoot them well. Plus, it's lighter and less expensive than a PXXX classic Sig.
The problem is, I always like to shoot a gun before I buy it. None of my friends own a Sig Pro. None of the local gun ranges have one available for rent.
So, my question is how similar - or different - is the Sig Pro to its metal framed brothers? I heard the decocking lever is harder to operate. Is it as reliable and accurate? The Sig Pros seem kind of overlooked for some reason.
I'm thinking of a .40 cal for informal target shooting and self defense.
I was thinking the Sig Pro might be a good option for me. I have no problem with the classic Sig's SA/DA trigger. I've own 4 polymer framed Glocks, and shoot them well. Plus, it's lighter and less expensive than a PXXX classic Sig.
The problem is, I always like to shoot a gun before I buy it. None of my friends own a Sig Pro. None of the local gun ranges have one available for rent.
So, my question is how similar - or different - is the Sig Pro to its metal framed brothers? I heard the decocking lever is harder to operate. Is it as reliable and accurate? The Sig Pros seem kind of overlooked for some reason.
I'm thinking of a .40 cal for informal target shooting and self defense.