Is there any reasons to buy a blued revolver?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blued vs.........

If you like a gun with character, one that shows its been handled and cared for, then blue it is. Heres one blued over unpolished steel (called Dulite back then in 1943) that shows a lot of wear and when you hold it in your hand it give you a warm fuzzy feeling! :)
 
"...and the market is sold on stainless because the owners..."

...are lazy? :neener:

Hundreds of years of blued guns and not one of them melted in the rain. A little oil, wax or grease goes a long way.

John
 
Blued guns have a more traditional image and to me are absolutely beautiful. The problem is that bluing falls off a gun if I so much as walk past. As a work of art, blued guns. As a shooter, stainless steel.
 
blued finish highly polished is classic.
SS finish is cheaper to produce same as plastic stocks. screw up a bunch of plastic and you just send it back to reuse. screw up a nice picec of wood and you have a nice piece of screwed up wood to make little things out of.
all that rambling to say again blue is classic to me.
 
Oddly, when sold together, the more labor-intensive blued revolver costs less than the SS versions... go figure.

Carbon steel has been long heralded as making better barrels than SS. Oddly, Ruger went to a NASA developed SS product for their .454 and .480 SRH's.

I think Elmer Keith might just prefer the SS 629MG over the blued 29MG, if both had suitable wood stocks. The utility of SS is hard to beat in a 'pack'in' gun. The beauty of a properly stocked blued revolver is hard to beat - great for a bbq piece. As another example, I can't imagine my 1895 Nagants in SS...

Stainz
 
I like blue always will, stainless is ugly in my eyes and that isn't about to change. This is also why I haven't even looked at a new S&W in a couple of years, No Blue, your loss I will look for used guns, I don't need to buy.

I also challenge the stainless is easier to maintain BS. By the time I get the Flitz out and really clean up a stainless gun it takes twice as long to clean as a blued gun. Durability, I give a little to the stainless, but if more people would learn how to care for a blued gun, they would have a lot less problems. Look at my pic on the 41 mag thread, almost 30 years, and still looks great, and mine did not sit in a gunsafe, it was packed and used.

I have acquired a couple of stainless guns, in the last few years, I usually avoid them like the plague, but its getting more difficult to by blue guns, so if I really want something its hunt for something nice used or swallow bile and buy a stainless. Choices are geting limited.

If you like stainless guns more power to yah, but I am in the old school camp and fed up with gun manufacturers telling me what I can buy cause they are too cheap to build guns they way I like, or their legal department has forced engineering changes. :barf:
 
Blued guns have grace and beauty. A deeply blued gun with a nicely figured set of exotic wood grips is a work of art.
I don't particularly mind stainless, but if I have two identical guns in front of me, only difference being one is blued and one is stainless, I'll pick the blued one.
 
I agree with Standing Wolf and Old Fuff - Posts 9 and 11 respectfully.

The metallurgy of the Blued guns, especially the Older ones with more attention to finishing and metal preparation before bluing - this being the secret to a nice blue job by the way - were actually more resistant to rust problems.

Bluing is controlled rust. With the quality of HSC finished out by meticulous prepping by hand tools, obtaining such a high polish before being blued, then blued, the result was not only good looks- one also had a finish that held up to the elements remarkably well. Simply because of the metallury, finished out proper, and bluing took / takes / becomes better the better high polish of metal prepping. With common sense of inspect and maintain as one should do anyway- especially a carry piece, no big deal to re- apply Carnuba Car Wax, RIG to protect. Even just plain machine oil, will protect simply because of all the aforementioned.

Then we have the blued metal ( HSC) metallurgy to do all sorts of things in regard to heat,strength, elasticity, and all sorts of big words that mean " Blue does it better than Stainless by very nature of metallurgy".

Stainless is just that "stains" + "less". Resistant to - not guarnteed to NOT Rust. Pores are larger I understand, and other big words that mean stainless is perceived to be less maintanance. Granted take a blued gun and it costs more to refinish. Stainless is less monies to refinsh - heck take it out back and sandblast it, or use an eraser to remove black marks off cylinders, or even a Scothbrite pad. It will rust. Folks "think" they do not have to inspect and maintain - then one day look under under the stocks to find rust...bad rust.

Then we have the folks that have shot high round counts with a blue gun - gun is still tight and in tolerance. Same folks have the same gun in a stainless version - CRSam is just person whom shared he had a rattle trap gun of stainless metal in short order and the older blued versions with higher round counts were still tight and fine.

We today have other factors that come into play - one real biggie is manufacturers cutting corners to meet a price point and make bigger profits.

Careful what you ask for - you might just get it.

Folks wanted cheaper gas at the pumps - so now everyone pumps their own gas. The 'filling station" where the folks pumped gas are almost history. Standing in really nice dress clothes , en- route to a wedding, funeral, business meeting or job interview, nobody to pump your gas - hardly anymore. Do you want walk in and smell like gas?

Folks wanted " everyday low prices" . Will the Druggist run a persciption by your house if you are unable to drive due to illness, surgery? The Mom & Pop Druggist did...before he closed up.

Blued guns from Blackpowder, to Mil-surps, to you name it have survived harsh conditions well. I do not believe anyone is finding collectibles of these in stainless. I don't recall folks fussing about how to remove Cosmoline from any either. I do read folks making comment on how great the finish is on a blued one they cleaned up though.

We have many camps and positions on firearms. Blue and Stainless is just one. There is a reason many folks prefer the OLDER blued guns. Why they go to gun shows such as Tulsa and pay the same price for a used older blue gun than a newer one in blue, or steel. Even without the matter of gun locks, collecting, that deep blue finish or mag capacity - folks want the QUALITY and craftsmanship that went into the metallurgy later blued that is proven to work, last and give piece of mind on reliablity and function.
 
In addition to looks, back on TFL there used to be a lot of discussion about blued carbon steel being stronger than stainless. Don't know if it is true with the particular grades of steel actually used in today's firearms or not. Another reason, is most of the time blued will cost less to buy.



I don't know of any current (I mean new) carbon blued revolvers.

Taurus, Ruger and a few S&Ws (the M10 and the new M57 Mountain Gun being to notable examples) are made in blue.
 
Hey isn't it enough that blued guns with wood stocks are just good looking? A classic pre-Model 27 or a Colt Python. My gosh those were beautiful handguns. I once saw a photograph of a Russian Stechkin. Believe it or not that was one fine looking weapon. I honestly didn't think the old Soviet manufactuers were capable of turning out such finely machined and polished handguns, but this one was.
I even own a Winchester M1895, one of the new one that were manufactured in the past ten years. I bought the deluxe model because that was all I could get. They knocked themselves out and gave it a great bluing. It's a thing of beauty.
I own a few SS handguns, but they can't beat the blued models when it comes to looks. That's my two cents.
 
weeelll, this old fart thinks blue is beautiful. i have both and the SS goes where blue fears to tread. clean up a blue gun and it is a sight to behold. and, the blued gun will show character in holster wear on the finish. the SS is just that, efficient, practical, nothing more, but a gun to ride the river with. thats why i have both. i get the bighead at the range when everyone wants to look at my blues with wooden grips. they pay cursory attention to the SS with rubber as that is most likely what they have. if i could only have one, i would be hard put to choose, but it would probably be my 657 in 6". for those of you that are not familiar with SnWs myriad of numbers, as i am not, the 657 is a stainless .41 mag. beauty is in the eye of the beholder and in my eye it is beautiful, even if stainless with Hogues.

admittedly old far, out.
 
I'm obviously in the minority here. Many people get very romantic and nostalgic about guns. I don't. I'm LAZY! Blued guns are beautiful. A perfect bluing job on a Python or 27 is great. But, keeping it perfect requires much more work than SS, and nothing is worse than not putting in the time and seeing the rust speckling dot your beautiful revolver. Some enjoy the time cleaning and polishing their blued guns. I don't. I think SS guns are very nice and the less care needed is huge for me.
 
Why blue?

my27-2.jpg


Any questions? :D
 
Glossy blued guns are like artwork. That's the reason why I like them. Stainless guns are good everyday tools, I like them too. :)

M29-PR2.jpg
 
Duh.

I can't believe no one hit on this. Definitely a tactical consideration. This requires a small bit of imagination, but if you really were trying to be somewhat covert with a handgun in hand, would you want it to be a shimmering, shiny stainless silver? That's my biggest/best reason, other than what was mentioned previously.

TX
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top