Sleuth
Member
I have fired (a limited amount) the SA80, but my opinon is re-enforced by a good friend who just retired as a REME Armour. In fact, he was sent to the tests of the SA80A2.
1. Ergonomics - you have to be double jointed to access the controls at the shoulder. When you pick up a hot rifle, you can burn your fingers on the front sight base (which sticks up out of the handguard) or the sling swivel (Ditto), take your pick.
2. Stregnth - depends on the age of the duct tape holding things on. I don't trust any rifle where I can squeeze the mag well and deform it with my fingers.
3. 'One sided' - Troops in Northern Ireland would not patrol down the left side of a street. The rifle is right hand only - no problem, for decades no one has been allowed to shoot left handed in HM Forces.
My friend says that the A2 is a more reliable weapon - but the last I heard, the SA80 was decertifed for NATO - meaning UK troops cannot carry the SA80/L85 on NATO missions.
It's so bad, I'm surprized that the french did not design it! Imagine, the french have a better rifle than the Brits!
1. Ergonomics - you have to be double jointed to access the controls at the shoulder. When you pick up a hot rifle, you can burn your fingers on the front sight base (which sticks up out of the handguard) or the sling swivel (Ditto), take your pick.
2. Stregnth - depends on the age of the duct tape holding things on. I don't trust any rifle where I can squeeze the mag well and deform it with my fingers.
3. 'One sided' - Troops in Northern Ireland would not patrol down the left side of a street. The rifle is right hand only - no problem, for decades no one has been allowed to shoot left handed in HM Forces.
My friend says that the A2 is a more reliable weapon - but the last I heard, the SA80 was decertifed for NATO - meaning UK troops cannot carry the SA80/L85 on NATO missions.
It's so bad, I'm surprized that the french did not design it! Imagine, the french have a better rifle than the Brits!