<joke> To Hell With Your Science/Pertinent Information to My Query /s

Status
Not open for further replies.
We no longer have to "reinvent the wheel" because there is the archiving of the collective knowledge base related to shooting/reloading on the internet part of which THR represents. And the "pioneering/exploration" spirit is not dead hence why we have things like 9mm Major that is receiving growing public interest/acceptance from those that pushed the limits of boundaries to be included in movies like John Wick 3.


Alive and well. :)


Many THR members push/test things related to shooting/reloading to the point of failure/breaking ... It is what we do and what "defines" us as curious human beings ... Now with improved load data, we just do it within the limits of current published load data or reference more conservative load data to "start out" our load test/powder workup, but not always.
  • During the "Great Shortage", I was volunteered by my component group buy to test new "untested" Promo that was claimed to burn at Red Dot burn rate. Having Glock 22/23/27 40-9mm conversion barrels with thicker chamber walls, I proceeded to develop and test various 9mm/40S&W/45ACP/45Colt/.38Spl loads using Red Dot load data with great success that "reblended" Promo that meters well is now my designated general purpose 9mm/45ACP powder, especially for carbine loads - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...blended-promo-for-more-accurate-loads.841097/
  • For a long time, those in H&R subcategory wondered why Hodgdon didn't publish load data for 9mm using WST with many claiming WST is spikey with pressure "at the top". Instead of following Hodgdon's silence on WST for 9mm, we ventured out to calculate max case fill referencing all available published load data to provide THR members wanting to load 9mm using WST with usable load data with specifics to powder case fill calculations - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...er-target-published-load-data-for-9mm.870180/
  • Also during the "Great Shortage", I tested Herco for 9mm/40S&W (Including lead bullets) with accurate test results for 40S&W so without the benefit of currently available load data, THR members could reference test results for load development. Like Promo, Herco has become one of my favorite powders for "clean burning, inside the case clean burning" for 40S&W behind BE-86 in terms of accuracy. Here's one of many 40S&W load development threads "venturing out there" without the aid of currently published load data - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...lead-bullet-data-needed.874760/#post-11635963
We got curious and started pondering. :)
index.php

  • And after being challenged by some THR members that my "sample size" wasn't large enough, I proceeded to shoot over 40,000 rounds of 30+ brands/weights/lots of 22LR ammunition over several years out of 10/22s, Take Down, ARs with CMMG conversion bolts, new GSG1911, new 10/22 Collector #3 and new T/CR22 (And now G22 with Advantage Arms 22LR slide kit) capturing and documenting 5/10 shot groups at 50/100 yards of last 10,000+ rounds with full transparency - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/real-world-accurizing-22lr-on-the-cheap.898035/
And I found out around 1/2" groups with factory 10/22 barrel at 50 yards was doable even after 6000+ rounds were shot through the barrel and around 3/4"-1" with even cheap "bulk" ammunition - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...22lr-on-the-cheap.898035/page-2#post-12304052

index.php


And 1.25"-1.5" groups at 100 yards with factory 10/22 barrel - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...22lr-on-the-cheap.898035/page-2#post-12194385

index.php
And some of us just have an over developed sense of curiosity.
Or maybe just too much time on our hands.... :oops::D:D
 
You mean like the one that says "Do not use this mower for trimming hedges."
I was a regional service manager for Deere & Co. Yearly we averaged about five lawsuits where guys would try to trim hedges with their push mower. Instead they got a manicure.

Why do you think there is a safety on the grip that kills the engine if you’re not holding the handle?
 
Lately I've been very displeased with the science, or lack thereof, being displayed by members of the gun community/THR

What happened to us? Where is our scientific spirit?
I think part of the reason could be the proliferation of various video review channels on the internet with seemingly unlimited budget and time to conduct reviews and tests. Why conduct "science" if it is readily available at your finger tips? ;)

With reviewers/testers like Project Farm, I can glean quite a bit of useful information based on his "standardized" testing methods to arrive at product purchase decisions - https://www.youtube.com/c/ProjectFarm/videos

I'm constantly amazed at the amount of information available on THR. Ask a question, stupid or smart, and within hours you can expect a well reasoned response to your question.
In the Handloading & Reloading category of THR, we used to challenge/claim that THR H&R had the fastest question to answer response time, often with the "correct" responses compared to other forums. :) (Some members actually tested this and posted the same question on multiple forums ... Well, you could "guess" what happened :p)

For many decades, I have been a proponent of sighted/unsighted point shooting and started out my training with eyes closed to synchronize "natural" POA with POI to place bullet holes anywhere on target at will (The essense of "Zen" of shooting). I thought I was alone on this while I trained/shared with people in my retirement eyes closed point shooting - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/flinching-drills.864546/page-2#post-11416785

And now "eyes closed" natural POA/POI point shooting has become a "thing" with USCCA, even for match shooting - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...hose-with-vision-issues.891558/#post-11996959

My most recent learning has been "cadence shooting" where you produce fast controlled follow up shots accurately (Demonstrated by video at 5:20 minute) and now incorporated into my point shooting training/drills.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top