Poper
Member
And some of us just have an over developed sense of curiosity.We no longer have to "reinvent the wheel" because there is the archiving of the collective knowledge base related to shooting/reloading on the internet part of which THR represents. And the "pioneering/exploration" spirit is not dead hence why we have things like 9mm Major that is receiving growing public interest/acceptance from those that pushed the limits of boundaries to be included in movies like John Wick 3.
Alive and well.
Many THR members push/test things related to shooting/reloading to the point of failure/breaking ... It is what we do and what "defines" us as curious human beings ... Now with improved load data, we just do it within the limits of current published load data or reference more conservative load data to "start out" our load test/powder workup, but not always.
- During the "Great Shortage", I was volunteered by my component group buy to test new "untested" Promo that was claimed to burn at Red Dot burn rate. Having Glock 22/23/27 40-9mm conversion barrels with thicker chamber walls, I proceeded to develop and test various 9mm/40S&W/45ACP/45Colt/.38Spl loads using Red Dot load data with great success that "reblended" Promo that meters well is now my designated general purpose 9mm/45ACP powder, especially for carbine loads - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...blended-promo-for-more-accurate-loads.841097/
- For a long time, those in H&R subcategory wondered why Hodgdon didn't publish load data for 9mm using WST with many claiming WST is spikey with pressure "at the top". Instead of following Hodgdon's silence on WST for 9mm, we ventured out to calculate max case fill referencing all available published load data to provide THR members wanting to load 9mm using WST with usable load data with specifics to powder case fill calculations - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...er-target-published-load-data-for-9mm.870180/
We got curious and started pondering.
- Also during the "Great Shortage", I tested Herco for 9mm/40S&W (Including lead bullets) with accurate test results for 40S&W so without the benefit of currently available load data, THR members could reference test results for load development. Like Promo, Herco has become one of my favorite powders for "clean burning, inside the case clean burning" for 40S&W behind BE-86 in terms of accuracy. Here's one of many 40S&W load development threads "venturing out there" without the aid of currently published load data - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...lead-bullet-data-needed.874760/#post-11635963
- After "myth busting" digital scales for reloading verified with Ohaus ASTM Class 6 check weights down to 1 mg (0.015 gr), we pushed the limits to find out what caused "Zero drift" of digital scales to disassembling analytical/lab digital scale (Yeah, we found the root cause of zero drift and how to fix it) - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-scale-zero-drift-and-can-it-be-fixed.893402/
- And after resolving Varget down to single kernel, we found out actual weight depends on kernel length and angle of cut or measured weight could vary (See the different lengths of Varget kernels and angles of cut in below picture) - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...lab-scale-for-120.873830/page-2#post-11627511
- And oh no, resolving Varget to single kernel wasn't enough. We ventured on and resolved Promo down to single granule/flake using the latest Creedmoor Sports TRX-925 digital scale and found out how to get around the "auto zero" - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-reloading-scale-review.904159/#post-12262497
- And for those who want to "sweat the details" of reloading variables, we ventured out and tested neck tension and bullet setback relative to case wall thickness and bullet diameter - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...neck-tension-and-bullet-setback.830072/page-4
- And there are many reloading variables and shooting variables for us to test - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...s-and-discussions.778197/page-9#post-10940381
And I found out around 1/2" groups with factory 10/22 barrel at 50 yards was doable even after 6000+ rounds were shot through the barrel and around 3/4"-1" with even cheap "bulk" ammunition - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...22lr-on-the-cheap.898035/page-2#post-12304052
- And after being challenged by some THR members that my "sample size" wasn't large enough, I proceeded to shoot over 40,000 rounds of 30+ brands/weights/lots of 22LR ammunition over several years out of 10/22s, Take Down, ARs with CMMG conversion bolts, new GSG1911, new 10/22 Collector #3 and new T/CR22 (And now G22 with Advantage Arms 22LR slide kit) capturing and documenting 5/10 shot groups at 50/100 yards of last 10,000+ rounds with full transparency - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/real-world-accurizing-22lr-on-the-cheap.898035/
And 1.25"-1.5" groups at 100 yards with factory 10/22 barrel - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...22lr-on-the-cheap.898035/page-2#post-12194385
Or maybe just too much time on our hands....