Ive had a thread or 2 here lately and slowly learning about the rifles the current market has to offer. From what ive seen if you don't want an AR you better be darn smart and know what your looking at and buying.
Ill be speaking in general here, So don't jump to conclusions unless i specifically call something a turd.
AR's seem reasonably standard of decent too high quality and price isn't always a determining factor. I mean you can buy a good one for a relatively low price.
But step outside the USA made AR's and man its a crap shoot with loaded dice unless your willing to pay way more than AR prices.
Ak reviews ive been reading seem to be put together in Pakistan and built from old Ford body panels that barely match and as accurate as a slingshot.
People passing off PSL's as Draganovs is one i find just wrong. And AK's are even a mix mash of parts left over from 3rd world countries shipped here and put on a new cheaply stamped receiver and hopefully fits together from all 7 guns the parts came from.
Cetme- Boy would i love one, Too scared to buy one tho.
Now ive been told in my other threads about how most AK's accuracy is hit or miss at 100 yards and mostly miss and i can believe it from what ive been reading and seeing.
20 years ago i bought my first AK and i know i was at the 100 yard range hitting decent shots from a standing position with iron sights. I know my eyes were better then, But id bet $100 so was the gun.
Saiga- Now they do seem to be the ONLY bright spot in this mess of duct taped guns that surround them on the shelf. Of course ive read the bad, But at least its a gun thats new and is all original. A+ Ruskies!
Im in the Battle rifle market, Yes. But i swear i need a darn expert with me if i look at anything thats not an AR or an upper class gun like an FAL,PT91 you get the pic.
I know it would be hard, But it would be great to see USA makers start lines of their own designs of M&P weapons for the civi's that may give us a better low cost option.
Mabey im way off here, But when the Cold war ended so did the quality of the AK as a whole, And the AR took off like a rocket. Its amazing what you can do and build with an AR these days, even on a budget.
BTW for anyone who followed my other threads i did visit a few shops yesterday. I held a MN 91/30 and a PSL both.
Gander Mtn wanted $900 for the PSL wich is....well expected from them, It did have the scope and mount on it to be fair tho. But as i was holding the gun talking to the salesman i noticed just how bad my arms was hurting after only holding it 2 minutes.
The MN was lighter than i thought it would be just like you guys stated, But one look at that metal butt pad against the wood made me cringe.
Did i take too much pain meds tonight?
Ill be speaking in general here, So don't jump to conclusions unless i specifically call something a turd.
AR's seem reasonably standard of decent too high quality and price isn't always a determining factor. I mean you can buy a good one for a relatively low price.
But step outside the USA made AR's and man its a crap shoot with loaded dice unless your willing to pay way more than AR prices.
Ak reviews ive been reading seem to be put together in Pakistan and built from old Ford body panels that barely match and as accurate as a slingshot.
People passing off PSL's as Draganovs is one i find just wrong. And AK's are even a mix mash of parts left over from 3rd world countries shipped here and put on a new cheaply stamped receiver and hopefully fits together from all 7 guns the parts came from.
Cetme- Boy would i love one, Too scared to buy one tho.
Now ive been told in my other threads about how most AK's accuracy is hit or miss at 100 yards and mostly miss and i can believe it from what ive been reading and seeing.
20 years ago i bought my first AK and i know i was at the 100 yard range hitting decent shots from a standing position with iron sights. I know my eyes were better then, But id bet $100 so was the gun.
Saiga- Now they do seem to be the ONLY bright spot in this mess of duct taped guns that surround them on the shelf. Of course ive read the bad, But at least its a gun thats new and is all original. A+ Ruskies!
Im in the Battle rifle market, Yes. But i swear i need a darn expert with me if i look at anything thats not an AR or an upper class gun like an FAL,PT91 you get the pic.
I know it would be hard, But it would be great to see USA makers start lines of their own designs of M&P weapons for the civi's that may give us a better low cost option.
Mabey im way off here, But when the Cold war ended so did the quality of the AK as a whole, And the AR took off like a rocket. Its amazing what you can do and build with an AR these days, even on a budget.
BTW for anyone who followed my other threads i did visit a few shops yesterday. I held a MN 91/30 and a PSL both.
Gander Mtn wanted $900 for the PSL wich is....well expected from them, It did have the scope and mount on it to be fair tho. But as i was holding the gun talking to the salesman i noticed just how bad my arms was hurting after only holding it 2 minutes.
The MN was lighter than i thought it would be just like you guys stated, But one look at that metal butt pad against the wood made me cringe.
Did i take too much pain meds tonight?