I have listened to this for years about Ruger Single Six revolvers usually. We slugged the barrels that were out of the guns on both old and new model Single sixes. Then slugged Ruger, 10/22, 77/22, and the 96 lever actions. Also the 77/22 mag barrel and 10/22 mag barrel. The Single Six barrels were the same average size as their 22 long rifle barrels. I have a Single Six custom with a 15" barrel that was a 10/22 long rifle barrel. The bad/sloppy groups from most of these guns comes from alignment problems with the cylinder and barrel. A Smith mod 18 that had been rechambered to 22 mag shot great. Years ago before the 17 HMR or HM-2 a barrel was made called a swagger. It was a 17 caliber,.172, chambered for 22 long rifle with a long tappered lead/throat. They needed to be around 22" long and have a 1 in 9" or faster twist. The bullets came out a long 17 caliber and were very accurate. An article was in Precision Rifle about them. I have owned several. The CCI Stingers with the lighter bullet than the 36 to 40 grain hollow points were extremely accurate at 100 yards. You have also had custom Smiths reworking Ruger Single Six revolvers to centerfire and Bearcats to 22 mag for years. I think this has been repeated as "Fact" about bore size by so many, for so long that it has become a fact for many. Yet when the barrels are slugged and measured on Rugers and a few others it doesn't hold up. I believe what I do because of doing the measurements. You can believe what you want for whatever reason. Smiths do run tighter barrels. The 22 Jet they had used a .222 bullet instead of a .224, some think this is where a lot of this came from, maybe?