I recently bought both the Kel-tec PF9 and the Ruger LC9. I put 200 rounds through ea. ( with a buddy to share the recoil with), had about 15 FTE/FTF's with the Kel-tec and none with the LC9.
Cleaned both guns and shot 200 rounds through ea. again, same deal, about 15 FTE/FTF's with the Kel-tec and none with the LC9.
Accuracy was pretty equal with both guns, the LC9 has a very looooooong trigger pull. IMO looking at both side by side the quality of the LC9 is apparent. I would have been happy with the Kel-tec if it had 0-issues but that was not the case, sure, I could have gone back and forth with Kel-tec but it was a lot easier taking a $beating on it and keeping the LCR which so far has been 100% reliable.
From what I've been reading the Kel-tec PF9 is hit or miss, in my case I guess I missed.
Sigbear
Cleaned both guns and shot 200 rounds through ea. again, same deal, about 15 FTE/FTF's with the Kel-tec and none with the LC9.
Accuracy was pretty equal with both guns, the LC9 has a very looooooong trigger pull. IMO looking at both side by side the quality of the LC9 is apparent. I would have been happy with the Kel-tec if it had 0-issues but that was not the case, sure, I could have gone back and forth with Kel-tec but it was a lot easier taking a $beating on it and keeping the LCR which so far has been 100% reliable.
From what I've been reading the Kel-tec PF9 is hit or miss, in my case I guess I missed.
Sigbear