leadcounsel
member
I'm very interested in the Keltec RFB. I've already emailed Keltec with this question and am waiting for a response. But I'll pose it here too, and hopefully be able to answer the question with an official KT answer soon.
I like the forward thinking of KT with the design. I also like the fact they choose to use surplus FAL metric magazines. However, I wonder why KT didn't use even more affordable and available HK91/G3/PTR91 mags???
FAL mags are admittedly hard-ish to come by and about $15-20 each whereas the HK/PTR91 mags are $1-2 each in bulk surplus, and very reliable mags... Does anyone have any speculation or ideas as to why KT would chose the more rare and expensive of the two presumably equally good magazines?
I like the forward thinking of KT with the design. I also like the fact they choose to use surplus FAL metric magazines. However, I wonder why KT didn't use even more affordable and available HK91/G3/PTR91 mags???
FAL mags are admittedly hard-ish to come by and about $15-20 each whereas the HK/PTR91 mags are $1-2 each in bulk surplus, and very reliable mags... Does anyone have any speculation or ideas as to why KT would chose the more rare and expensive of the two presumably equally good magazines?