I am sure that the finicky Solo has been posted here. I am currently in the middle of trying to get some relief from Kimber for my Wife's Solo. What I'm wondering is has any of you had a positive experience with Kimber that was a result of how you approached them? Here's why I say that. I know that insurance agents are trained to deny claims. It is said that one should try at least seven times for a claim. I know that Kimber knows that the Solo has issues that are a result of manufacturing and not ammo, cleanliness or shooting ability. However, upon initial contact with Kimber they almost immediately began to badger me that there are four reasons for weapons to fail. As listed above. They went on and on about ammo, cleanliness and shooting ability but would never consider manufacturing. Here they would make the claim that anything mechanical can be fixed or replaced. NEVER that there may be a design flaw. We met with a repair specialist at the NRA show in Indianapolis. He seemed genuinely sincere. I want to be cautious as to how to approach him and here I would like to hear from any of you who may have been at this same stage and have advice for me. BTW. There has never been harsh words, raised voices, disparaging remarks or insults of any sorts. A lot of innuendo by Kimber that my Wife can't shoot though. Also, the problems with the Solo are the same. They started when the gun was new. They continued through all of Kimber's suggestions, cleaning, ammo, shooting etc. and began where they left off after Kimber sent the gun back. The ammo has been very costly and is the Kimber recommendations. My Wife has been shooting for some 35 years and has won numerous awards. She has plenty of small, medium and large frame revolvers and autos. It's not her, her ammo or cleanliness. It is however, the only gun that continues to jam. It was to be her PDW. Not so much now.