Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Korea - when they move to M16?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Rebar, Oct 15, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rebar

    Rebar member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,867
    I was reading an article about the ROK troops in Vietnam, and I was wondering when they transitioned from the Garand/Carbine/BAR/etc. to the more modern M16/M60/etc. Anyone know? Anyone bump into ROK troops in Vietnam?
     
  2. QuarterBoreGunner

    QuarterBoreGunner Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,932
    Location:
    West Oakland
    uhm... I maybe a moron here, but I though the ROK used the Daewoo K2?

    Oh wait, are you asking about the ROK in Vietnam? I wasn't even aware that ROK troops were in the 'Nam.
     
  3. Rebar

    Rebar member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,867
    The ROK had two divisions and a Marine brigade in Vietnam, and they were considered top-notch fighters.

    There was also Australian and Thai troops too.
     
  4. QuarterBoreGunner

    QuarterBoreGunner Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,932
    Location:
    West Oakland
    Well color me surprised... I knew about the OZ troops but never knew about the Thai or ROK troops. I guess I need to revisit my Vietnam history books. Interesting.
     
  5. 45shooter

    45shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    262
    Location:
    USA
    My father in the Army still had his M1 carbine when he left Vietnam in 1968 but he was not a front line infantry. My cousin started in 1969 with a M3 but finished with M-16 in 1971. I guess the change took place around 1970.

    BTW. ROK had the second largest foreign troop numbers in Vietnam... after US.
     
  6. M2 Carbine

    M2 Carbine Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    6,985
    Location:
    Texas
    I would imagine the Koreans used the Deawoo.

    I've had a Deawoo K2 and AR 15 for many years.
    IMO the Deawoo is a far better rifle, all around.

    In the late 60's I saw a short TV segment on the Koreans.
    An American reporter was with them, filming them.
    They had captured a VC who wouldn't tell them anything.
    The Commanding Officer came up and gave the VC a cigarette then asked him a question.
    The VC said he wouldn't tell them.
    The Commander turned to the soldier beside him and said, Kill him.
    The VC couldn't talk fast enough.
    He knew, American reporter or not, those Koreans would shoot him in a second.


    Another Korean story.
    In the 60's I was a flight instructor at the Army helicopter flight school.
    Another instructor had been flying H-21's in Korea for several years.

    He said, he happened to see a Korean Beaver land (I don't remember which airfield).
    He said the Beaver was all over the runway, almost ground looping.
    The airplane came to a stop in the middle of the runway.

    A very unhappy Korean General got out of the back and the pilot got out and snapped to attention.
    The General started yelling at the pilot and smacking the hell out of him.
    Mack, my friend, said the General was so mad he pulled his pistol out and shot the pilot dead.

    Mack said that shocked the heck out of the Americans watching.

    I asked Mack if he knew what happened to the Korean General.

    He said, they gave him a better pilot.:D
     
  7. 45shooter

    45shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    262
    Location:
    USA
    M2 Carbine

    Daewoo K1 carbines and K2 rifles were not developed until mid 1980's and were starting to be issued in late 80's so they were not used in the Vietnam conflict.

    Oh, don't believe everything you hear

    :D
     
  8. M2 Carbine

    M2 Carbine Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2003
    Messages:
    6,985
    Location:
    Texas
    Ya, I couldn't for the life of me remember what those Korean troops (on TV) were carrying but it must have been M-16's.

    I don't remember when I got my Deawoo but, like you say, it had to be in the 80's.:)

    Oh, I don't believe everything I hear, but there are people that you can bet your life on their word.;)
     
  9. Rebar

    Rebar member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,867
    I think it's important to know that the US didn't fight the war alone, and to recognise the contribution of our allies.

    South Vietnam (ARVN) has around 900,000 men in the field. While some of those were poorly trained poorly led conscripts, the elite units (Marines, Rangers, Airborne) were at least as good as the best of the American units.

    USA had around 530,000 men in the field at the height of involvment.

    ROK had around 50,000 men (Capital "Tiger", White Horse divisions, Blue Dragon Marine brigade).

    Thailand had around 11,500 men (Queen's Cobra regiment, Black Panther Division).

    ANZAC (Australia-New Zealand) had around 8000 men.

    The Philippines had around 2000 combat support troops.
    *********************************************
    I can well believe the stories about ROK troops. Seems they redefined the words "hard core". I would still like to know when they transitioned from WWII era weapons to the newer M16/M60/etc. weapons.
     
  10. Steve Smith

    Steve Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,394
    Location:
    Southeastern US
    I'm sure some have the M16, but I will tell you I have seen them with Daewoos in forward areas very recently.
     
  11. 45shooter

    45shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    262
    Location:
    USA
    Rebar,

    It wasn't done all at once so I would still estimate it started with new incoming units in late 1969 or early 1970 and "completed" around early or mid 1971. BTW it was never totally completed as a lot of non-combat ROK units in Vietnam were using M1 rifles and carbines till the end of that war.
     
  12. Rebar

    Rebar member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,867
    I found a news clip showing ROK troops being handed new M16s in 1967. I figure it's likely that all combat units were fully equipped by '68.
     
  13. minnesota oldie

    minnesota oldie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    154
    Don't for get the M14 which I carried from 1963-66. When I went back in the service in 1967 most had the M16.
     
  14. minnesota oldie

    minnesota oldie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    154
    Sorry, didn't read the post well enough. We supported a bunch of Korean 105 artillery sites and I saw a bunch of M1 carbines.
     
  15. Gabe

    Gabe Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2003
    Messages:
    387
    Location:
    San Jose
    I recall a US officer saying he saw a Korean general punch a Korean Colonel in the face in front of everybody for screwing up.
     
  16. Lone Star

    Lone Star Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,744
    Location:
    SW USA
    The Japanese used Korean guards in some of their WW II prison camps. I read that they were quite vicious.

    It is also my understanding that Korean units in Vietnam often didn't venture too far from their base camps, and were known for corrupt (blackmarket) dealing. This info was gleaned from news reports of the day. (1960's)

    Lone Star
     
  17. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,083
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    What was that book--"A Marine Sniper in the Arizona Territory"? Or something like that.

    It's about a Marine that goes to in-country sniper school and meets ROK Marines. IIRC, the Koreans were armed with U.S. WWII weapons.

    I'm at the office now, when I get back to the FBP I'll look it up in my library, er, um home office.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page