LA Times poll

[skeeziks]

"Voted, Honestly I'm surprised this poll is up, usually when the results aren't to their liking it comes down quick."

Well, there were 55 No's Before I voted. Now there are 54 After. And I naturally voted NO.

 

[grubbylabs]

It seems to me that the judge needs to retake history and constitutional law. No where in the constitution does it indicate self defense and or hunting as a reason for the 2nd amendment.

I don't know how people forget that the big issue of their time was gaining freedom from an oppressive government and that they needed their guns to do it.

 

[fatcat4620]

we are back 55-45 keep up the fine work guys. It was 51-49 when I started this.

 

[scchokedaddy]

Done with a NO!!!

 

[gloucestergarand]

45 for, 55 no!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Hardtarget]

I don't hit a poll very often...but I did this time.

Was at 45 to 55 % no at my vote time. Do you really think it will matter?

Mark

 

[ApacheCoTodd]

Yeah - back up to 44/56!

 

[Friday1]

done

 

[XD Fan]

Done! 56/44 to the good.

 

[fatcat4620]

I don't hit a poll very often...but I did this time.

Was at 45 to 55 % no at my vote time. Do you really think it will matter?

Mark

Any time they can't point to one of there polls to endorse gun control we win.