Laser Guns, Do you want one? Please read first...

Laser Gun as below


  • Total voters
    137
Status
Not open for further replies.
Safety Rules

What would you do with the "Laser Rule" of firearms safety? I guess it would take on new meaning.

It gives "Keep your frickin' finger off the trigger!" a whole new meaning.

random thoughts...

There should be a piece that is removeable so you can "open the action" and "unload".

With the right electonics you can verify the range to the target and adjust the energy before you shoot, of course with coherent laser light, this should be moot within reasonable distances.

No more doping the wind!

No bullet drop!

With the right optics there are no need for "tracer" rounds.

Use the right "color" laser and it will penetrate flesh but not walls.

It doesn't have to be shaped like "a gun".

It can be put on a robot, and you can play it like a video game.

OK, I'm scaring myself now...
 
Would it still be called a "fire arm" if it doesn't use fire or explosion to propel anything? An air gun isn't a fire arm, and a "light gun" doesn't have any rules or laws specifically naming it so (yet).

Justin
 
An effective laser weapon would be cool, but I think I'd rather have a light-gas gun in a package as portable as a typical sporting rifle. :D
 
lasers wouldn't cauterize anything, because the damage is caused by the struck material vaporizing explosively. Almost no heat would go into to the tissue around the struck area. At least that is the case with welding and cutting lasers.

The momentum from a bullet does nothing to the target except make sure that the bullet keeps penetrating.
 
To overcome the trivial protections that can be used to thwart a laser you'd need one that could impart as much if not more energy than a standard chemical powered rifle. It can be reflected, various kinds of smoke will scatter it, and simple materials will provide a heat sink against them. It will most likely need multi-frequency capability up to X-Rays to punch through such obstacles which may consume more 'ammo'. Going back to lead shot filled flak protection that is as shiny as a gay chorus line is going to really endear the soldiers to them. :)

I don't see a functional man portable laser rifle for 20 years and doubt the military will use them even then due to inertia and capabilities. To overcome institutional inertia you'd have to show they are more capable, cheaper, more reliable and then go squash or buy off all the special interests who would lose out on the new fangled gizmo. We may see a man portable tank killer or anti-air device but it will more than likely be single shot.

The military does have an experimental mobile chemical laser which is not too large works reliably. It has logistics issues with chemical transport and reloading but is impressive.
 
Last edited:
To one of Cesiums point, the idea of some fool playing 'star wars' and indiscrimately sweeping people is just a little much to bear. Besides, I like things that go 'BOOM!".
 
NO "SPORTING USE "

Cauterizing my prey from a mile away and spraying photons at the target is not, in my opinion, sporting , and furthermore I dont really see the need for the average hunter to be brandishing them in the woods terrorizing other hunters . It makes the whole of us look bad . I know I will catch some flack for this , but I say ban them ! Nobody should have one .
 
Originall posted by Green Lantern:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Forget lasers...I want a Phaser!

Sure, it's not as "cool" (tacti-cool?) as Han Solo's trusty DL-44...but even if us civvies are limited to "stun-only" models, it'd still be the ULTIMATE nonlethal weapon!

Then again, seeing how the maroons in some cities regulate stun guns and pepper spray, I can imagine that you'd need permission from the .gov to even carry one of those when they become real. I can see it now:

Newscaster in 23rd Century: "And in other news, Sarah Brady the Fourth called on a ban on stun-Phaser sales to civilians, saying that otherwise every city will be reduced to "a scene in Star Trek".

KirkNRA.gif
 
Cauterizing my prey from a mile away and spraying photons at the target is not, in my opinion, sporting , and furthermore I dont really see the need for the average hunter to be brandishing them in the woods terrorizing other hunters . It makes the whole of us look bad . I know I will catch some flack for this , but I say ban them ! Nobody should have one .

HEY! When did Zumbo get an account on THR? :D I don't remember "sporting use" being in the 2nd A wording anywhere.....


Remember, this will be just like cloning humans. Sure it's outlawed in every nation and just plain "wrong". But if you have enough money, and it is already scientifically doable, somebody IS doing it/selling it. So make our beloved "blasters" too expensive for the average Joe, and place a ban on them because they are "scaring hunters in the woods". SOMEBODY will still have them, just not us responsible citizens. I'll sleep fine with whatever I've been training with by my side (as long as the force is with me!) :D

Justin
 
go ahead and start my BG check ASAP I want one. But I want it mounted in liue of my highbeams on my truck so I can clear traffic at the touch of a button.
 
CNY, you'd have to have a pretty spiffy cooling system on those retroreflectors to get them to last for very long
 
Senator Chuck Schumer: "Ladies, and gentlemen...these LASER WEAPONS are the gun of choice of street gangs, and we must institute new anti laser gun legislation to ensure the safety and security of our nations children"

:evil:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top