LC9 loaded chamber indicator

[hvychev77]

i actually just watched a review last night by hickock45 on the keltec and the ruger. no doubt the ruger costs a little more but, i guess that's a subject for another thread because i'm sure there's all kinds of debate there. i personally like the ruger better, he had a magazine issue which caused a failure to feed and one of the magazines wouldn't accept the full amount on the keltec. the ruger performed flawless. so, is it worth it to me to spend a few more bones on the ruger? you betcha!! thanks for all the replies guys.....hvychev77

 

[jon_in_wv]

Another thing to consider with the LC9 is the trigger guard is bigger on the LC9. The PF9 is a little small for my fat fingers. It works fine but it just feels like I'm sticking my finger in there instead of my finger just falling on the trigger.

 

[Effigy]

On that note..... I do believe the LCI is a requirement on some states. ie: not Rugers decision to have it.

A requirement in some states? Sure. Required to be abnormally large? I doubt it. Required to emboss a RTFM message on side of the gun? Again, doubtful. It just feels to me like Ruger went way overboard with the safety features on this gun.