Hondo 60
Member
Today I had an opportunity to go gun shopping.
I held a Ruger LC9 & Kel-tec PF9.
I found the Ruger trigger to be llooonngggg.
The Kel-tec trigger seemed to be MUCH nicer.
Of course (& unfortunately) I wasn't able to fire either of them.
I live in a small town, so there's no place to go to rent any.
And I don't know of anyone who has either of them.
Money is a bit of an issue, so I'm very strongly leaning toward the Kel-tec.
and as I said above, the PF9's trigger seemed much better too.
Is there anyone who has or had both?
What were the pluses & minuses of each?
Thanks folks!
I held a Ruger LC9 & Kel-tec PF9.
I found the Ruger trigger to be llooonngggg.
The Kel-tec trigger seemed to be MUCH nicer.
Of course (& unfortunately) I wasn't able to fire either of them.
I live in a small town, so there's no place to go to rent any.
And I don't know of anyone who has either of them.
Money is a bit of an issue, so I'm very strongly leaning toward the Kel-tec.
and as I said above, the PF9's trigger seemed much better too.
Is there anyone who has or had both?
What were the pluses & minuses of each?
Thanks folks!