Lead fouling in my 1911's

Status
Not open for further replies.

CZ223

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
1,672
I am getting quite a bit of lead building up in my 1911's and it doesn't make sense. I am using a 200 gr rnfp which is cast to 18 BHN. I am loading it over 5.3 grains titegroup. This should give me just over 900 ft/sec. though I don't have a chronograph. They shoot pretty well in all my guns. I have loaded lots of lead over the years including for 357 and 44 mags and never had this much buildup. Of course with the 44 mag I was using a much harder bullet but I am not pushing these very fast at all. Is it possible that it is a problem of using the titegroup with this particular alloy? DOES TITEGROUP BURN HOT ENOUGH TO CAUSE THE EXCESSIVE LEADING?
 
Bullet is too hard, and Tightgroup is not the best choice. Try W-231 and buy 12 BHN bullets next time.
 
It is my opinion that you are pushing a cast lead bullet much too fast regardless of the powder used. As Walkalong stated, Titegroup is not the best powder for your bullet and I agree. Drop your load to under 800 fps and I would suspect your leading will cease. If you want higher velocities, go to a jacketed bullet, but don't stress your pistol with extremly hot loads.
 
Last edited:
Cut the load.

If you are truly curious, chonograph your load. I will bet it is moving faster than you thought it was going.
 
leading

CZ,
Slug your bore. It sounds like your bullets are slightly undersized. They must be at least .0005-.001 OVER bore diameter. 18 BNH is on the hard side for volume target shooting. As was mentioned, around 12 is much better. the bullet base can obturate and fully seal the bore with the softer bullets.

4.2-4.7 gr of Titegroup is a well proven Bullseye load with the 200 gr SWC. At 5.3 you may be a little hot, but it depends on what you are developing the load for. If you're looking for an accurate practice load, I'd drop down to 4.2-4.3 gr with a well matched 200 gr SWC.

Other excellent 45ACP powders are 231, Bullseye, Clays, WST as well as a few others I haven't tried.

Stork
 
Where is the bulk of the leading? At the chamber end, the muzzle or evenly dispersed?

Chamber end usually means too hard a bullet at too low a pressure and/or sized too small to seal in the bore.

Muzzle end means too fast or running out of lube.
 
I never puch lead bullets over ca 800 fps. Titegroup would not be my first choice for a lead bullet load. In 45 ACP I prefer WST, American Select or W-231.
 
Thanks for the replies guys

I buy the bullets I load locally and 18 BHN is what he cast them at. That is what I have to work with. The bullets mike at .452. Oddly enough it seems like my two Kimbers are leading more than my other guns though, admittedly, it might just be that I shoot them more than the other 3. I think I might start by trying a different powder like American Select or 231. I can't really drop the load too much as that is what I shoot IDPA with. On that score, can some tell me how fast a 200 grain 45 has to be moving to be an IDPA legal loading.
 
I can't really drop the load too much as that is what I shoot IDPA with.
Oh, I think you can. You just need 825fps for a 165 PF.
From a personal observation, TG sucks.
 
As stated above, the primary causes of leading are #1) undersized bullets; #2) bullet too hard and a distant third, inadequate bullet lube (with modern lubes, I've not yet found this to be an issue).
 
I push very hard cast SWC bullets as high as 1300 fps with 2400 in both my .357 and .44 with no significant leading in either. Nor does my 1911 lead with "normal" full powder book loads but I've never chronographed it. It does require the correct diameters and a good lube such as the Alox/Beeswax formula.
 
Walkalong

Sorry to take so long getting back to answer your question. I had to clean all 5 of my guns before I answered. At first I thought I only had leading at the chamber end but, while there is clearly more at the chamber end, there is fouling throughout the entire length of the barrel.
 
Sounds like it started at the chamber end, which suggests undersized or too hard, and continued to build up until it spread down the bore. If it is undersized or too hard, dropping the load will not help, and could make it worse. Uping the charge, within safe limits, has a chance of stopping the leading by bumping the bullet up to seal the bore and stopping the gas cutting going on.

12 BHN will most likely cure the problem.

I still say Titegroup adds to the problem when there is gas cutting going on from either of the two mentioned possible problems.
 
I've shot almost 2000 rds of 200 gr. LSWCs (18 hardness) over 5.0 grains of Titegroup through my 5" 1911 without any leading problems. I chronoed them last fall and averaged 860 fps, which makes major PF. I keep the OAL at 1.248-1.250.
 
Use 231 or HP38 (same powder)
I shoot 124gr. lead in a 1911 9mm at 1080FPS and no leading. Also, shoot 200gr LSWC in 1911 45ACP and no leading. Leading could be the lube your bullet supplier is using
 
I see some posters saying you are pushing them too fast, and I disagree. I push a Missouri Bullet 18bhn to full magnum velocities without leading problems. In my opinion, I would say you are using too hard of a bullet, and a powder that isnt the best for the application. Can you get some Missouri Bullets next time you need bullets? I'm not sure why you are stuck with those bullets for good.
 
+1 for Walkalong's suggestion of a different powder and bullet. 231 is the Grail for 1911s, TiteGroup is what I use for my .40 and 9mm defense loads as it pushes copper FAST!

Likely your local supplier has given in to the demands of customers (or his own fears) about soft lead causing every leading problem. I'm sure, though I've never visited, THR has suppliers for cast bullets that are better suited to your purpose.

I like Clays (4.1 gr. @ 857 fps from a bone stock SS Colt Govt.) as it is readily available locally and loads well for .38 SPL.
 
I load 4.7 grains Titegroup under a lead 230-grain for my .45's and it doesn't have appreciable leading. That gives me around 800 fps all day long (184 pf). I push 9mm at around 1100 fps without leading problems.

I use a lot of Titegroup, about 5 pounds a year, for my target ammo and I like it. That said, it is a hot burning dual-based powder (Nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine) and iirc it has one of the highest concentrations of nitroglycerine in powder. So it burns HOT, which means it's probably not the best for lead loads. Again, I like it and I base my loads around it.

My thought is your caster is using hard crayon type lube, cheap stuff that looks nice in the box and won't come out of the groove or get messy in shipping- which is common. .45 acp is too low of pressure to require a high BHN bullet. Anything harder than wheel weight alloy is too hard for .45 auto, which is about 12 bhn. Combine too hard of alloy with too hard of lube and you get leading. The NRA formula 50% beeswax/50% ALOX is the old standard for .45 lube, but it will melt out in higher temperatures and stays a bit soft in the groove.

You could try a light tumble lube in ALOX diluted 50-50 with mineral spirits and see if that helps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top