Hello, this is my first hand loading thread ever. I've decided I'm going to start hand loading a few calibers. I've been doing research now for two weeks and have some first questions to ask. I would really appreciate it if owners or users of this equipment responded. If you haven't used the equipment, please state that if you reply.
My purpose is to reload .308/7.62x51 for a SA Loaded M1A with a scope and FN PBR XP bolt rifle. I will be shooting between 100-300 yards from bench and I may enter some casual hi-power competitions at my local club with the M1A (either before scoped or else I'll get a second and shoot competition). I am also going to reload 6.5x55 for bench shooting, .357 magnum for defense and .40 S&W for handgun practice and defensive loads.
I will be shooting about 2-3 times a month and not using too terribly many rounds, so loading a few hundred rounds per month is plenty. I shoot kind of slow, keeping a cool barrel, and prefer accurate placement, although it's not worth it to me to go insanely high up the cost-benefit scale for an extra 1/10" group size decrease. That is why I bought the Loaded M1A and not the National Match. A 1-1.5 MOA dispersion rate is fine with me, as that is probably better than I can shoot.
From my research, the Lee Classic Turret Press and the Hornaday LML AP Progressive seem to be the best fit for my needs. Feel free to chime in if you really feel there is something better which I should consider, but please, hold the ignorant Dillon chest-thumping, I've heard it and seen it before. I'm a person who buys a piece that functions well and is a good value, not a blind slave to a name. Like someone else said, I want to know why you bought it, not what you bought.
My first question is, if I buy one, what will I be missing from not buying the other, and vice versa? I'm aware of the basic fact that output per hour is different and that isn't so much of an issue to me since I don't need the output of the Hornaday necessarily. How noticeable will the difference in the quality of round made be between the two?
If I did get the Lee, is the automatic powder measure as good as the press? I know the press quality itself is quite high but I wonder about the Lee accessories included with the press. The Lee Safety Primer seems to work very well compared to others I've looked at. Can other dies of higher quality be used with the Lee press with no real issues to speak of?
Thanks for the help with this new pursuit of mine. It's a big subject to delve into and help from those with experience is golden.
My purpose is to reload .308/7.62x51 for a SA Loaded M1A with a scope and FN PBR XP bolt rifle. I will be shooting between 100-300 yards from bench and I may enter some casual hi-power competitions at my local club with the M1A (either before scoped or else I'll get a second and shoot competition). I am also going to reload 6.5x55 for bench shooting, .357 magnum for defense and .40 S&W for handgun practice and defensive loads.
I will be shooting about 2-3 times a month and not using too terribly many rounds, so loading a few hundred rounds per month is plenty. I shoot kind of slow, keeping a cool barrel, and prefer accurate placement, although it's not worth it to me to go insanely high up the cost-benefit scale for an extra 1/10" group size decrease. That is why I bought the Loaded M1A and not the National Match. A 1-1.5 MOA dispersion rate is fine with me, as that is probably better than I can shoot.
From my research, the Lee Classic Turret Press and the Hornaday LML AP Progressive seem to be the best fit for my needs. Feel free to chime in if you really feel there is something better which I should consider, but please, hold the ignorant Dillon chest-thumping, I've heard it and seen it before. I'm a person who buys a piece that functions well and is a good value, not a blind slave to a name. Like someone else said, I want to know why you bought it, not what you bought.
My first question is, if I buy one, what will I be missing from not buying the other, and vice versa? I'm aware of the basic fact that output per hour is different and that isn't so much of an issue to me since I don't need the output of the Hornaday necessarily. How noticeable will the difference in the quality of round made be between the two?
If I did get the Lee, is the automatic powder measure as good as the press? I know the press quality itself is quite high but I wonder about the Lee accessories included with the press. The Lee Safety Primer seems to work very well compared to others I've looked at. Can other dies of higher quality be used with the Lee press with no real issues to speak of?
Thanks for the help with this new pursuit of mine. It's a big subject to delve into and help from those with experience is golden.
Last edited: