Lee Classic vr. Dillon 550B or 650

Status
Not open for further replies.

WLE

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2009
Messages
122
Location
Loganville, Ga
I am currently using a Lee Classic 4 Hole. Seems to be a great tool no problem with it at all. I have 5 turrets preset with dies and all I have to do is set the dies and load the powder. however I can only produce about 150 rounds per hour or so. I have been thinking about the dillon Presses which they say about 400 per hour. I don't want to spend all my evenings reloading so I have been thinking . For those who own a 550 now can you justify the cost of the dillon vr time on a Lee classic 4. Will the Lee dies I have now work in the dillon? For an additional investment of 500.00 or so do you think it is worth it in the long run? I watched some u tube but it is hard to decide from a photo that is why I am seeking wisdom from a higher source.

Bill
 
if price is a concern, red koolaid. The hornady Lock N Load AP press.

It is progressive auto indexing, uses lock bushings (10 for $11.99)Press comes with 5 bushings. Dillion uses Die Plates. The LNL has a lifetime warranty like the Dillion, and right now you can get up to $300 worth of free projectiles if you purchase your LNL AP press by 12-31-09.

I too started with Lee. Now I have three single stage presses for working up individual loads (Rock Chucker and two Lee C Presses) and the LNL AP for volume.

Not to mention the LNL AP cost between $369 and $399 depending on the vender. It compares to Dillion 650. The 650 is well over $500. If you add back in the rebate it becomes almost a no brainer.

My .02

LNLAPHornady8-29-09nng.jpg
 
Dillon 550

I have had mine for over 10 years and it's still kicking & cranking. They're selling for around $400 now. I wouldn't trade it for any of the others, and I own several. I would suggest the LNL may compare to the 550, but the 650 is out of its league. I can easily load 400-500 rds/hr on the 550 when I get in the mode. Hornady is quality gear, but my vote is for the Dillon - your choice. You'll find rooters for each side, but the Dillon has got the edge in numbers sold, and I have used their "no BS" guarantee. Don't misunderstand - I have Hornady gear of all sort, as well as RCBS, Lyman, Pacific, etc etc and even Lee (my first reloader was a Lee Loader in 308, which I still have & use after 40+ years), but Dillon is the gear for me. Here's a quote from Gunblast.com and the link to the article:

"The Dillon 550B is their most popular loading machine. In fact, the 550B is the most popular progressive loading machine in the world, and for good reason. The versatility of the machine is unsurpassed by any other progressive machine. The 550B can load just about any centerfire metallic cartridge in existence. Dillon's literature says over 120 different cartridges."

http://www.gunblast.com/Dillon550.htm

TRGuy has a good, functioning setup that he is comfortable with and works for him - that's as good as it gets, mine is just a different color ;)

Cheers,
Maj Dad
 
I don't know if this has been answered, but your Lee dies will work in the Dillon. You may need the Dillon powder drop die (cheap), though.
 
If you already have the dies for the Lee, why not get the Lee Pro 1000, or LoadMaster. I have the Pro 1000 and it has vastly increased my production efforts. I was like you and got tired of pulling that handle 4 times to make 1 round of ammo. Now, it seems like I'm hardly spending any time at all at the press. And the Pro 1000 is only $160 at MidwayUSA. Just buy extra shellplates and turrets to use for caliber changes.
 
I think TRguy is giving you good advice. I have a 550b and like it but I don't hesitate to recommend the LnL. From everything I've read it's a great deal on a very good progressive press. Even better when you count the value of the rebate bullets.
 
How do you use your Lee Turret?

I assume you are typically using it with the auto indexing rod installed. I have an (updated) Lee Turret--and I use it that way, about 99% of the time--but I typically load handgun cartridges, and .223.

Personally, I would not now want to go to a progressive machine that does not offer indexing--which the 550 does not. Think carefully about whether or not this feature / lack of will be an issue. I suspect you can / will learn new habits should you get a 550--but that characteristic alone, combined with the cost of caliber changes in Dillon products, kept me from considering a 550.

Should I upgrade now (I do have a Load-Master, too), it would probably be to the LnL.

Jim H.
 
IM embarassed, I got them from MidSouth for $33.99

http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.com/item.asp?sku=00005044096

My apologies.

The Dillion 550 toolhead (Die Plate) is $20. That allows one preset caliber conversion. The 10 pack of bushings allow for 3 preset caliber conversions. for $34 versus 3 preset caliber conversions on the Dillion at $60.

regardless both great machines you will enjoy either you get, and whatever you decide know you will join a koolaid team with lots of folks with you and another team that always will enjoy ribbing ya.

Again sorry for the misquote for the bushing pack price.
 
Should I upgrade now (I do have a Load-Master, too), it would probably be to the LnL.

I use the Lee with the Auto index, just too slow anymore, it was ok when I just strickly shot revolvers. I checked out the Load Master on Line it seems like I can use my auto Disk, shell holder and primer feeders. Can this machine (LM) produce the same out put per hour as the LNL? What are some of the mechanical advantages and disadvantages with the LNL and the Load Master? Why is a double charge check on the LNL important if the turret indexes automaticly? I appreciate any and all feed back. As of now I load for.380,357 mag. 44mag. 9mm, 45acp, and 40S&W so I would like something that I can set up and change over rather quickly. The one feature that I liked most about the Lee classic was that I have enough turrets with all my dies set up ready to go, just charge the powder but I just would like to poduce more for less time spent. My mind is open to all suggestions, thanks to all for your thoughtfulness.
 
I'll make some observations about the Load-Master, since I have had one for about fifteen years or so--I bought mine the year after they came out.

The Load-Master has a steep setup and learning curve, IMO, steeper than need be. It also can have a steep maintenance curve. I first used it for about three-four years, then wandered away from shooting / reloading for awhile. When I wandered away, I was ready to throw the Load-Master out the window--had ongoing / multiple problems with priming feed, indexing, die setup for consistent LOAs, etc., etc.

Two-plus years ago, I jumped back into the sport, and I resolved to get the Load-Master set up well and running reliably; I also wanted the option of 4-5 die turret configurations. The first thing I did was send it to Lee, to have them go over it and check a couple of issues. They did this for free; all it cost me was shipping one way.

It was at this time that "secondary support" in the form of various online Load-Master owners first showed up. I was alerted to YouTube videos, first those by Shadowdog500 and then those by DarwinT. Eventually, DarwinT set up a support site and forum, and that has become a central repository for on-line tips and help from Lee owners and enthusiasts. IMO, this forum--loadmastervideos.com--makes it possible to successfully get a Load-Master running well reasonably quickly. I know it prompted Lee to upgrade their online support efforts a bit--but their printed Load-Master manual still is not a good manual for the first-time progressive buyer, or for a reloader not mechanically inclined and problem-solving oriented.

I now have learned most of those tricks, and I use the Load-Master productively. With production recipes sorted out, and careful die setups, I can readily run 360-420 rounds per hour. If I am super-organized prior to startup, I have run 600 rph. (I no longer do that; the concentration needed is too tiring.) My case feeder works just fine, and I have the primer issues fixed--at least until I need to change primer sizes. Would I tell you not to get one? No. Mind you, I also have no complaints about Lee's price-material decisions about plastic primer trays, chutes, and the like. They work fine, once you get them figured out. Once I updated my (Load-Master dedicated) Pro Auto disk to include the chain pull-back, that resolved the one remaining anxiety I had about the powder-dispensing design.

Meanwhile, I have examined an LnL at my LGS, and I do feel it is a better-made machine. I have reached the conclusion that the LnL is, for a bit more money (and maybe not, with the free-bullet promotion), a better-built press with a lower setup curve. AFAIK, there are only two-three real issues to "fix"--and one of them, a modified handle sold in the aftermarket, really is an enhancement and not a fix.

I don't think much of the primer-feed design on the LnL (and Dillons)--but I've not used it, either. The Lee system for loading up is better, IMO. But, overall, the LnL appears to me to be a better long-term proposition, at least for production fodder.


Jim H.
 
WLE -
While the Lee product is a good value, obviously some "corners have been cut" to obtain the low product price. IMHO the missing corners result in inconsistent loading and lots of fiddling with the machine to finish any batch of ammo. If you've reached that point in your reloading career, then you simply need a machine from the next rung up, not more of the same.

Both the Hornady LNL and the Dillon 550 compare very favorably. When everything is finished, you'll have spent close to the same amount on either. Here's the big tie breaker: The Hornady comes with 1000 free bullets for now, the Dillon has a lifetime guarantee for later.

So the question comes down to how much longer are you going to be reloading?
 
rfwobbly said:
While the Lee product is a good value, obviously some "corners have been cut" to obtain the low product price. IMHO the missing corners result in inconsistent loading and lots of fiddling with the machine to finish any batch of ammo.
Well, you are saying "IMHO" missing corners cause inconsistent loading. That hasn't been my experience. How many rounds have you loaded with the Loadmaster?

jfh said:
It was at this time that "secondary support" in the form of various online Load-Master owners first showed up. I was alerted to YouTube videos, first those by Shadowdog500 and then those by DarwinT. Eventually, DarwinT set up a support site and forum, and that has become a central repository for on-line tips and help from Lee owners and enthusiasts. IMO, this forum--loadmastervideos.com--makes it possible to successfully get a Load-Master running well reasonably quickly.

That was my experience. I bought my Loadmaster in April, 2008 and used the loadmastervideos.com forum and supporting materials to get set up.

I had never reloaded before and did not know anyone to "show me the ropes" locally. The online videos and support made my press setup very straightforward and worked like a charm.

I've loaded well over 5,000 rounds in the last year in 4 calibers, and my loadmaster has worked just fine. I might get 1 or 2 tipped primers per thousand. My powder measures consistently and cleanly. My rounds at the range look and fire no differently than rounds made by any other brand.

My steady state is without trying to hurry, while visually confirming the powder level of every round, visually confirming the primer feeder dropping a new primer every round, visually confirming the case feeder is still full and feeding correctly every round, and then periodicially confirming & measuring the powder weight, OAL, and crimp diameter for every 25 rounds. At the above steady state, I easily load 400 rounds per hour. I could go much faster if I tried to cut corners, but that obviously makes no sense.

WLE said:
For those who own a 550 now can you justify the cost of the dillon vr time on a Lee classic 4. . . .For an additional investment of 500.00 or so do you think it is worth it in the long run?

As of now I load for.380,357 mag. 44mag. 9mm, 45acp, and 40S&W
As I indicated above, I have been happy with the Loadmaster. Since we still have some freedoms left, you are obviously free to choose whatever brand you want. However, I'd like to assist you in having full information so you can make an informed decision.

You've listed 6 pistol calibers. That means you will desire 6 turrets (although not required), appropriate shellplates, plus the ability to feed both large and small primers and a variety of case sizes.

Below is a summary of everything you would need to order for the 6 calibers. The listing shows the Lee part number, description, list price, and "street price".

I understand you already have all the dies you need. Since the Lee pricing is agressive for a press kit that includes everything needed for one caliber, it is actually cheaper to buy the kit and then resell the unneeded die set. I have assumed the kit was .45 ACP and then you'll need the rest of the parts. The abbreviation "LLM PP" stands for "Lee Loadmaster Progressive Press".

90945 LLM PP Kit 45 ACP (List $330.00) (street $206.00)
90075 LLM PP Small Primer Feeder (List $24.98) (street $15.50)
90659 LLM PP Case Feeder Small Pistol (List $25.00) (street $17.00)
90667 LLM PP Case Collator (List $14.98) (street $13.00)
90910 LLM PP Shellplate #4s (380) (List $29.98) (street $20.50)
90907 LLM PP Shellplate #1s (357 Mag) (List $29.98) (street $20.50)
90920 LLM PP Shellplate #19S (9mm & .40 S&W) (List $29.98) (street $20.50)
90917 LLM PP Shellplate #2L (44 Mag) (List $29.98) (street $20.50)
90079 LLM PP Turret #2 (List $14.98) (street $14.00)
90079 LLM PP Turret #3 (List $14.98) (street $14.00)
90079 LLM PP Turret #4 (List $14.98) (street $14.00)
90079 LLM PP Turret #5 (List $14.98) (street $14.00)
90079 LLM PP Turret #6 (List $14.98) (street $14.00)

Total list price is $589.78. Total street price is $403.50.

If you re-sell the die set then:
90513 Lee CARBIDE 3-DIE SET 45 ACP (List $39.98) (street $23.70)

Selling NIB at street price would reduce your costs to $379.80. The street prices listed are today's prices at Wideners; prices at MidwayUSA, Midsouth Shooters Supply, Grafs, fmreloading.com, Kempf Gunshop, etc. are going to vary slightly but be in the general ballpark.

I strongly recommend that you create a similar detailed purchase list for any other brand you may consider (Hornady/Dillon etc.). I believe you will be shocked at what the overall costs will be after you account for things like small & large primers, shell plates, turrets, and new powder dies. I don't have current prices since I purchased my press 18 months ago, but the additional cost per caliber is substantial.
 
Jumping Frong offers good advice

about the buying scenario for each brand. Be sure to check the "total cost" for a complete switchover for all the calibres you will be using the progressive for.

Another issue to consider in looking at these three presses is, IMO, the auto-indexing or lack thereof on the 550. The Load-Master's auto-indexing can be disabled in about two seconds--faster than the Lee turrets or the Pro 1000. I'm not sure how the auto-indexing is / can be disabled on the LnL; one of the users posting here can fill us in on that.

Understand that there is no doubt that the 550 works fine with manual indexing, and there are thousands of users who like that workflow. It does seem to provide the same kind of flexibility Lee Turret users have, and I am sure that you could adapt to it.

This issue comes down to real subjective preferences. Personally, I think that no progressive press should not have auto indexing. I imagine that is my preference because any progressive I've used or learned has it as a default mode. If one is seeking the production characteristics--and that is why you want to buy a progressive, you said--then that feature, or lack thereof, may need to be a deciding factor for you. (This issue is why we / I asked about how you used your Lee Turret further up in the thread.)

Jim H.
 
Originally Posted by rfwobbly
While the Lee product is a good value, obviously some "corners have been cut" to obtain the low product price. IMHO the missing corners result in inconsistent loading and lots of fiddling with the machine to finish any batch of ammo.

Well, you are saying "IMHO" missing corners cause inconsistent loading. That hasn't been my experience. How many rounds have you loaded with the Loadmaster?

To be fair, none with the LoadMaster. Previsously I owned 3 Lee Pro-1000's, each with multiple rotary shell holders and turret plates. Each machine seemed to refuse to co-operate in it's own special way. Even after swapping parts around I could not get a single press to operate correctly for an entire evening. If the primers weren't failing to feed, then the shell holder wasn't indexing correctly. It was always something. On and on.

Since I design and install real precision machines for a living, I finally said enough is enough and sold all the Lee presses and parts on Ebay for enough to buy one good progressive press to replace them all. With this press I'm loading in the neighborhood of 10,000 rounds a year. I've had zero primer mis-feeds. The powder drops vary so little that I can't measure the variations on my RCBS 505. And the OAL is within .005" from the longest to shortest round, batch to batch.

So now I'm happy. ;)
 
rfwobbly said:
To be fair, none with the LoadMaster. Previsously I owned 3 Lee Pro-1000's,
Sometimes it is hard to believe both products are from the same company, they are so different from each other. The Loadmaster is a substantial improvement over the PRO-1000.
rfwobbly said:
So now I'm happy.
I truly am glad you are happy. God Bless America, we still have the freedom to make our own choices. I am happy to.
 
While the Lee product is a good value, obviously some "corners have been cut" to obtain the low product price. IMHO the missing corners result in inconsistent loading and lots of fiddling with the machine to finish any batch of ammo.

RF I don't have a Lee progressive but have to agree that I have seen a lot more problems with them than other brand progressives. As far as the classic turret that the OP is using that is not the case. I have been loading on one for over three years without any fiddling and the ammo is very consistant. I think the main difference the OP will see is one round one pull instead of three or four handle pulls.
I have had a chance to load on a friends Dillon 550 and would go to a progressive with auto indexing if I was to upgrade just because that is what I am used to and like.

Rusty
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top