Lee Enfield

Status
Not open for further replies.

CaptFlint61

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
14
Location
Utah
Can anyone identify this particular style of Enfield?
Military hardware, 18" barrel with bayonet lug, Mark 4.
hope the pic is attached
 

Attachments

  • truckgun 001.jpg
    truckgun 001.jpg
    85.8 KB · Views: 106
The barrel is crowned it has the original military sights, this was not a hacksaw job since the bayonet lug is machined into the barrel as on the standard models.
 
never heard of that model; anyone have any history on it? I know there were some experiments to make shorter versions for commandos and the like. bought it a number of years ago as a good gun for the PU, both action 10 rounds of 30 caliber.
 
Navy Arms converted regular Enfield rifles to this fantasy "Tanker" configuration a number of years ago. They never existed as regular military issue.
 
It shoots fine - I travel and it is the type of rifle that no one will give me grief over and it was inexpensive less than $300
that is not boulder it is a fake rock that one of my companies build for the camo of various facilities located in sensitive areas. We do visual mitigation

www.structuralillusions.com
 
The barrel at the cutoff point is thick enough that bayonet lugs can be machined out of it to give a military look. It is not an issue rifle, or even some kind of "experimental" one.

Jim
 
According to the 1996 Navy Arms catalog, the "Tanker" carbines were cut down versions of the No. 4 Mk I in .303 British, and Ishapore 2A available in .303 British and ".308 Winchester" (actually 7.62 NATO).
308egxh.jpg
CaptFlint61's rifle in the first picture above is the No. 4 Mk I version.
 
Those MK 4 No 1's, still the best to my eye.
Per 303tom, no, not by the pic, but the OP was asking about the origins. I would think a re-barrel would be of significant consequence.
 
Navy Arms converted regular Enfield rifles to this fantasy "Tanker" configuration a number of years ago. They never existed as regular military issue.

This is the correct answer. Back in the mid-1990s when I knew a gun writer, I had to opportunity to examine a stack of Lee-Enfields that Navy Arms' "gunsmiths" altered. Their 'smiths were on par with Century's dunken monkeys -- some of the rifles worked OK, others should never have left the shop. E.g., one No.4 which was missing the firing pin retaining screw, and a No.1 Mark III "Tanker" that shot a good foot and a half to the right at 50 yards.

I wrote up a scathing review which he faxed to Navy Arms, but we never received a reply.
 
Berkley, look at the second paragraph under "A". It describes a "No. 4 Carbine" that sounds much like the OP's rifle. As the others have said, it is a cut down No.4 rifle, never issued in that configuration. It is the equivalent of the American "tanker Garand", a fake as far as being an issue weapon or having any historical significance.

Jim
 
It will put all rounds in a human sized target at 100 yds, shoots a respectable round 303 British. Makes a great truck gun and is legal in all the jurisdictions I travel in. I paid around $275 for it when I bought it.
 
A note of caution about truck guns. In many states, it is either illegal to carry a handgun in a truck or car, or a concealed weapons license is required. So some folks carry a compact rifle or shotgun. And those are generally not addressed under the concealed weapons laws.

But in many states, a rifle or shotgun is illegal to have in a car or truck if loaded or if ammunition is present under the hunting/poaching laws. So it is not always OK to assume that just because the firearm is not a handgun it is legal to carry in a vehicle for personal protection.

Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top