Lessons from a confrontation today

Status
Not open for further replies.

rainbowbob

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
2,559
Location
Seattle, WA
This is long, but I am recounting an incident that occurred today that I am still processing for lessons to be learned

Today my wife and I took our 4-year-old grandson and our dog to the off-leash park. We had just entered the park, the dog and the boy were playing, and Grandma and I were nearby. A puppy ran up to the boy and jumped up on him (as puppies are wont to do). I gave him the “off” command several times while looking around for the owner to take control.

Anyone who has been to a dog-park with small children knows this is a regular occurrence and not a big deal. Having said that, it is also common practice, common sense, and common courtesy for the owner to remain in proximity of their pet and attempt as best as they can to control and teach their puppy not to be obnoxious. We’ve been going to this park since Lola was a puppy – and it took a lot of patience, much embarrassment, and many profuse apologies to work her into a good dog.

After a long minute of fending off this puppy, I noticed that the owners, a man and women, were fully aware of what was going on, and saying nothing. So I asked them if they would please take control of their puppy. The woman kind of skulked away, while the man belligerently came over and muttered something along the lines of, “This is a dog park…I’ll control my dog - you control your kid.”

I just ignored him and began to move away. My wife was offended and said something about how our grandson wasn’t doing anything wrong. I said (admittedly loud enough for him to hear) that the posted rules require all owners to be in control of their dogs at all times and are responsible for preventing intrusive and inappropriate behavior.

Here’s where it got hinky:

From about 20 yards away he asked loudly in a threatening tone, “Do we need to talk about this some more?”

My back was turned to him and as I looked around I realized he was closing the distance between us quickly and aggressively.

I turned to face him with my left side bladed toward him and my right hand around the stocks of the snub in my front right pocket and replied, “There isn’t much to talk about, just read the posted rules.”

He kept coming, and he had a “look” in his eyes and the body language of a violent man with a short fuse.

I was ready to back away and attempt to defuse the situation while keeping my eyes on him. Suddenly my wife jumped between us and starting yelling, “I don’t need this s**t!”

I backed away, and he also retreated saying, “If your wife and kid weren’t here I would really f*** with you.”

I said, “Is that right?”

He said, “Yeah, that’s right...idiot!”

I took my wife and grandson and moved in the other direction.

The wife was understandably upset, and so was I. neither of us wanted to scare our boy any further, or allow it to ruin our day at the park – and it didn’t.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Tonight, we were able to dissect what had happened, what we did wrong, and how we’d do it differently. This is what we came up with:

I should have recognized his belligerent, anti-social behavior for what it was sooner. I should have immediately moved my wife and Grandson in the opposite direction as quickly as possible without commenting at a volume loud enough for him to hear. That probably would have been the end of it.

Despite those measures, if it had escalated to the point it did, my wife should NOT have come between us. This put her, my Grandson, and me MORE at risk. We are new (a year ½) to CC, and she is still not entirely comfortable with it. Part of that has to do with the fact that we have not talked through that many scenarios, and she was unsure – and afraid – about what I would do if challenged. [I must interject that we have been married 33 years and I have NEVER been in a fight in all those years.]

I explained that it was her responsibility to get herself and the boy out of harm’s way by moving laterally away from the scene. I assured her that my “manhood” and my ego were not important factors – and that this oaf’s opinion of me was irrelevant to our safety. I went on to assure her that my response – had she not intervened – would have been to back away, hand up, palm out, calmly telling him that we have nothing further to discuss. I went on to say that I would have walked backward - all the way to the lake if necessary – while he called me every kind of name. I would NOT have drawn my weapon unless and until he charged me after every attempt to de-escalate.

Having the opportunity to discuss it in depth was a useful exercise for both of us, and we both agreed with this after-incident assessment. I understand that I have to do more – sooner – to de-escalate. I think my wife genuinely understands for the first time that carrying an SD firearm does NOT mean I am looking for the opportunity to use it. After seeing the look in this thug’s eyes, she also seems to understand from this experience why a gun may be necessary as a last resort – and that I am sincere and confident in my ability to “keep it in my pants” unless it comes to that.

Thanks for listening.
 
Last edited:
I'm glad everything turned out ok. At least you were level headed, even if the other guy wasn't.
 
Rainbowbob,

I have to admit that I spend a great deal of time at the dog park myself. We have a near-80lb German Shepherd/Akita mix who gets very ornery if she doesn't get her daily exercise! Anyway, I've found that most folks at the dog parks are friendly, outgoing, and easy to talk with. Still, over the past 2.5 years or so that I've had this dog, we've also heard about a number of bad encounters at our local dog park.

One of my friends was recently on the opposite end of the jumping dog equation, and received treatment that was not disimilar to yours! Our friend, a slightly built early 30's female, was playing at the park with her dog one afternoon. We weren't at the park at this time, but heard about the incident from a number of witnesses. Apparently another guy walked by with his dog, and their dogs started playing together. As dogs will do, our friend's dog jumped up against the guy as he ran past him (this dog weighs all of 30lbs). Our friend immediately apologized, and called her dog back.

In response to this gesture the man reportedly started screaming at our friend, saying things like: "You stupid Wh*^&, get your F-ing dog out of here before I sick my F-ing dog on you, you dumb F-ing Bi^&*". The man apparently got right up into our friend's face, and began waving his arms and finger pointing at her in a threatening manner. Our friend isn't the quiet type, and told this guy that he ought to show a bit more maturity in a dog park that was also occupied by a number of children. The guy responded by saying something like "I'll take care of this", and then stormed off to his truck. I guess the idiot then hung out in the parking lot for a while, as if he was waiting for my friend. So, simply put, I can appreciate how a seemingly innocuous incident at a dog park could spark such a commotion.

All in all, I think you did a good job of debriefing yourself on this incident, and recognized some of the key points that I would bring up:

1) Protecting your family is always important, and you need to consider them first.

2) Ego should be checked at the door, as nearly anyone can be talked into a fight if you try to antagonize a tense situation.

3) It is better to swallow some pride, ignore the insults, and back out of the situation if it is possible to do so without violence.

4) A gun does not provide you with a lot of force options. A firearm is a deadly weapon, and by wearing one we each guarantee that every fight we are involved in is a "gun fight" (in essence, there is always at least one gun in the fight). As such, it is best to avoid any physical encounter, when possible, so that a simple disagreement does not escalate to the point of someone being shot.

Being a police officer myself, I am pretty always carrying. Because of the possibility of us running into a former "client" of mine at some point while I'm off-duty, I encouraged my wife to get a concealed carry permit a couple of years ago. With both of us carrying these days, I think we've both come to recognize that we would (perhaps) each handle a situation a bit differently. I'm a ghetto cop, and I am used to being "hands-on" with people who REALLY dislike me. I'm confident in my abilities, and have also come to an understanding about my limitations. I've trained in ground fighting, weapons retention, and have operated for years in an environment where I have to get physically engaged with folks while wearing a gun. As such, I wouldn't always expect my wife and I to handle a situation in the exact same manner. By the same token, you may find that the "correct" answer for you is not the same correct answer that would be chosen by either my wife or myself.

By way of example, my wife has told me that she absolutely won't become engaged in a situation while CCW'ing unless her life is on the line. She isn't going to chase down a bank robber, and she plans to find a way to retreat from a tense situation, if at all possible. On the other hand, I arrest people for a living, and I might find myself becoming involved in the response to a bank robbery, a domestic, or other physically violent situation in a manner in which I wouldn't expect my wife to. If I was at the dog park on the day that my friend was confronted, I surely would have become involved in that situation (frankly, I'm surprised that none of the "men" there were willing to become involved in that one).

So, I would encourage you to also think about your own comfort/skill/confidence level, and consider various responses that could be taken to these situations. The variables in these situations are nearly infinite, and your type of response may have to change depending on the circumstances you are faced with on any given day.

Just some food for thought for the future:

1) Could you have de-escalated the situation if you reached for your cellphone, stating that you were calling the police?

2) Could you have just ignored him completely and left the dog park?

3) Did you decide to stand your ground due to concerns over your family's safety, or were they better protected by a tactical retreat?

4) If the guy walked up to you and pushed you, how would you have handled that scenario? Would you have taken a step back and tried to remove yourself from the situation? Would you have responded in kind, would you have maybe exposed your guy, drawn your gun, or perhaps even fired your weapon?

5) Can you consider other intermediate force options for future use (ex: pepper spray)?

6) Would your possible response have been different had your family not been present?


** I don't pretend to know the answers to all of these questions, but I would encourage you to think about them as they relate to YOUR response if/when something ever happens again in the future **
 
Last edited:
My first thought with this was, " Somebody really DID need to draw this guy's attention to the rules and insist that he abide by them.". Then I realized that if the guy made it to adulthood getting by with a belligerant attitude nothing I could say in a 5 minute encounter would change him either.

Knowing that, you're kinda stuck with retreating. Which will re-enforce the negative behavior until instant karma ( in the form of someone just as belligerant and twice as tough ) catches up with him.

Your wife needs to be trained that under no circumstance is she to get between you and the threat.
 
you'd think an adult in a country where people carry handguns would have learned threating random people not a good idea:uhoh:
 
Hard to train a puppy, but a poorly trained or anti-social dog is a warning flag about the owner.

For a normal person, a puppy is fun and your puppy with a 4-year old is super-fun.

I have a sterotype about a certain type of dog owner who doesn't control his dog, because he wants it to get in fights with other dogs. He is proud if his dog is snarling, biting, bullying, humping other dogs. If the dog isn't big/tough enough, or doesn't have the demeanor, it gets dumped along the side of the road and a new puppy will come home. So when I see a particular breed of jerk ruining a puppy, I have a preconceived notion about what happened to his last dog, and what type of person he is.
 
Last edited:
There are a ton of posts along these lines, disengage, verbal warnings, spray, & fight.

If you're not in danger of serious physical injury and you can't get away, it's knuckles time...do not use lethal force against a less than lethal threat.

Serious physical injury: injury which will result in impairment of organs (eyesight, etc), result in death, permanent disfigurement, rape...

Sorry you had to eat your pride.
 
There are a ton of posts along these lines, disengage, verbal warnings, spray, & fight.

If you're not in danger of serious physical injury and you can't get away, it's knuckles time...do not use lethal force against a less than lethal threat.

Serious physical injury: injury which will result in impairment of organs (eyesight, etc), result in death, permanent disfigurement, rape...

Sorry you had to eat your pride.

Any fist fight, should it come that after all options are exhausted, carries the risk of death or serious injury. You have no idea what the intent of you assailant is. Exhaust all options, but a physical assault does put you in danger of serious physical injury.
 
Do you ever wonder why the cops don't shoot everyone who fistfights?

Think about this.

I'm not trying to overly simplify this subject, but ALL THINGS BEING PRETTY EQUAL you will go to jail if you shoot someone in the aforementioned scenario.
 
Last edited:
Because the cops have a few more force options, back up and know they're not going to get arrested?
 
you analyzed very well.

Losing control - as in commenting loudly - is always a mistake.

Running away is always the best option, as in moving out of harms way.

There is no such thing as honor, that you can lose by not fighting.

(i strongly advise to read Sun tzu "the art of war")
 
little bigman said:
Because the cops have a few more force options, back up and know they're not going to get arrested?

-yes, more options....hard physical contact (punches, knees) is followed by baton, and firearm.

-proximity of backup is a factor if you can avoid initiating physical contact or when you aren't being actively attacked, but is not an issue when you are in direct combat. Either the deadly force threat is present or it isn't.

-not sure I understand the "and know they're not going to get arrested" part. If a LEO kills someone, there's a homicide investigation...you will be arrested if you acted improperly.

The force continuum is a training model, you don't have to climb the ladder one rung at a time, you can jump to the level required to overcome resistance.

The following factors combine to determine what rung you jump to: "officer-subject factors" size, training, injuries, intent, weapons....and more.

-If you're being choked out, attacked with a deadly weapon or dangerous implement, attacked by a physically superior person, a group, attempted rape, severely injured, gun grab fight, etc......lethal force becomes an option.

Add in the old ability, opportunity, jeopardy and finish up with a subjective vs. objective analysis of your situation....and if you're a cop: what would another reasonable/trained officer do.

All things being roughly equal, can you see where "I'm gonna punch you" because of a dog, doesn't warrant a deadly force shooting?
 
Do you ever wonder why the cops don't shoot everyone who fistfights?...
It's not a fair argument to compare the way a cop handles a situation with the way a civilian does. We can't arrest the guy, we don't have escalating force options, we aren't trained for that, and most importantly... it's not our job to wrestle with bad guys.

That being said, I agree that shooting someone rather than taking a punch is a great way to land yourself in prison. I also personally think that unless there is a huge disparity of force, it is really chicken**it of a person to pull a gun rather than take a punch. I would say cowardly, but that word doesn't seem to pack as much punch any more. Anyway, long story short, there are very few cases where it is ok to shoot an unarmed person. If it isn't ok to shoot them, it isn't ok to pull a gun.

To the OP, it sounds like a scary situation. I think you did a good job in breaking it down and learning from it after the fact.

-not sure I understand the "and know they're not going to get arrested" part. If a LEO kills someone, there's a homicide investigation...you will be arrested if you acted improperly.
I think a lot of the rationale of "they'll get away with it" comes from the fact that so many cops do get away with breaking laws, and so many departments will stand behind an officer and deny that he has done anything wrong. This does happen, and it happens a lot. That doesn't mean that all departments give their officers an unfair advantage in an investigation, or that every cop will get away with a crime. I'm sure the majority of departments will take an investigation seriously, and the majority of officers will not break the law. It isn't a fair label to give, but that is where it comes from.
 
I think most males have a tendency to get the "last word in." I know I do.

Hindsight is always 20/20, but I think we can all take from this that your "parting shot" was what caused the escalation. That's not so say that he wouldn't come at you anyway.

I have to train myself to keep my mouth shut and this is a perfect example as to why.
 
That being said, I agree that shooting someone rather than taking a punch is a great way to land yourself in prison. I also personally think that unless there is a huge disparity of force, it is really chicken**it of a person to pull a gun rather than take a punch.
This is a very dangerous mindset to have, especially if you carry. You have no idea what background your potential threat has. He could be a trained boxer. Even if he wasn't a trained fighter, one (lucky or deliberate) punch is all it needs to completely reverse the flow of the fight or end it altogether.

Let's go with the worst case scenario, with a punch he has you knocked out. You just lost control of your gun, let's hope he or a bystander doesn't pat you down for wallet and find your gun.
 
I think most males have a tendency to get the "last word in." I know I do.

Hindsight is always 20/20, but I think we can all take from this that your "parting shot" was what caused the escalation. That's not so say that he wouldn't come at you anyway.

I have to train myself to keep my mouth shut and this is a perfect example as to why.
I don't know if I agree completely. I don't go around trying to start fights, and especially not fights where I may end up having to shoot someone to make it out in one piece. But I'll still speak my mind. If someone says something out of line to me, I'll say something back, and I won't be backing down. But I also won't do it in a way that is agressive. If the other person starts getting agressive, I'm going to disconnect from that person and walk away, but not until then. I'm not a confrontational person, but I also don't go through life avoiding confrontation at all costs. I like to face my problems head on, and all of that. But my goal is always de-escalation. I'm not going to stand up to someone with the intent of escalating the situation, but rather to speak my piece and try to bring them down. I guess it's a personal choice. I also don't think that taking a punch is a reason to pull a gun, and I know the consequences of not walking away. I'm ok with confronting people when I feel that I need to, and not because I'm packing. I've taken a pretty serious beating and not pulled my gun before. I'm not going to go around looking for a fight, though. Especially not when I'm packing (always packing).
 
There was a very good episode of "The Best Defense" on a couple of weeks ago about de-escalation. I watched part of it (had DVR'd it) and even though it's scripted, it proved a very good point: as a citizen carrying a gun, you must swallow ALL of you pride immediately, otherwise you have not done your part of de-escalation. That means body language AND verbal language.

If you live in a "stand-your-ground state" (VA isn't ...yet) you have no duty to retreat, though it would look pretty bad if you shot him because he attacked you because you mad a smart-aleck remark with the intention of having him hear you. You're not DogPark Cop, call the owners or the police, or, better yet, go to another park. Also, have your wife attend a personal defense school. Having her trying to act as intermediary without her having been trained is a real danger for the both of you.
 
Bad situation all around...I totally agree with uh-oh though.

Also, is it really that good an idea to take a 4 year old to a dog park? There is a big chance of out of control dogs at those places...I've decided against even taking my dog to them after an incident I had, let alone would I ever take a child.

Maybe you feel confident, maybe it's a different area in terms of the layout...but man, there are some rude and careless people at dog parks. I'm telling you.

Also, I'm just gonna be kinda pesky to coloradokevin and say (OT): please walk your dog daily and don't consider dog park time "exercise"...it isn't! I'm sure you're a great dog owner though and know this :)
 
good luck on getting the wife onboard if it works for you let me know the trick. i deal with my wife as one more problem in the equation
 
If you live in a "stand-your-ground state" (VA isn't ...yet) you have no duty to retreat, though it would look pretty bad if you shot him because he attacked you because you mad a smart-aleck remark with the intention of having him hear you.
There is nothing illegal about making smart-aleck remarks, and there is no justification for attacking a person for saying something smart-aleck to you. Nothing you can say, short of "give me your wallet", is justification for violence.

...he attacked you...
Matters

...because...
Does not matter
 
you'd think an adult in a country where people carry handguns would have learned threating random people not a good idea

I disagree. As you can see and armed man is a polite man and can be pushed around and threatened easily without recourse.
This thug thinks he won this confrontation, and that will only perpetuate his behavior onto others. Someone who is unarmed might decide to teach him a lesson, but an armed/good citizen will simply vacate the situation like Bob did.

Your assumption about this nation is wrong, but could only be correct if the "people carrying handguns" recklessly and irresponsibly wielded their firearms at the onset of every argument. That doesn't happen here, so there's no way for "an adult in a country where people carry handguns" to learn that "threatening random people is not a good idea". This guy doesn't have the core values to know that his behavior is wrong.
 
I don't know if I agree completely. I don't go around trying to start fights, and especially not fights where I may end up having to shoot someone to make it out in one piece. But I'll still speak my mind. If someone says something out of line to me, I'll say something back, and I won't be backing down. But I also won't do it in a way that is agressive. If the other person starts getting agressive, I'm going to disconnect from that person and walk away, but not until then. I'm not a confrontational person, but I also don't go through life avoiding confrontation at all costs. I like to face my problems head on, and all of that. But my goal is always de-escalation. I'm not going to stand up to someone with the intent of escalating the situation, but rather to speak my piece and try to bring them down. I guess it's a personal choice. I also don't think that taking a punch is a reason to pull a gun, and I know the consequences of not walking away. I'm ok with confronting people when I feel that I need to, and not because I'm packing. I've taken a pretty serious beating and not pulled my gun before. I'm not going to go around looking for a fight, though. Especially not when I'm packing (always packing).

And my point was that after you've made a parting-shot, smart aleck comment, you've ALREADY escalated it. Even inadvertently so. At that point, de-escalation might not be an argument. Remember your (and not YOU personally, whomever) mouth has already gotten you in trouble. Trying to talk your way out of it to a belligerent person might be futile.

All I was saying, having taken an introspective look at myself having read the OP's story, I probably would have done the same thing: snapped off a hot headed response and then had to deal with the fact that now he's really pissed off and coming at me. I need to be careful about that.

It's pretty clear, even from the OP's analysis, that the best course of action would have been to not say anything or engage him in any way.

You never know what sets people off nowadays... As far as speaking your piece - if someone else is pissed off, aggressive, etc. because of something you've said, the opportunity to speak your piece has passed. Now you're in defense mode, with a gun. Not good - especially when all you had to do was eat a bit of crow and walk off.

As CCP holders, it's our implicit responsibility, at least IMHO, to be the mature, thinking adult. We hold, within arms reach, a means to end someone's life and should avoid confrontation at all cost.
 
i hada learn to not make that last smart remark of course when i run my tongue arond my mouth to where that tooth used to be i get a reminder. i learn better that way
 
if'n your wife was a cat i hazard to say her getting between you 2 used up one of her 9 lives.
though her actions were successful, you 2 need to makes plans together as to how you will interact in the future.
and parting remarks are best said unsaid
 
All things being roughly equal, can you see where "I'm gonna punch you" because of a dog, doesn't warrant a deadly force shooting?

Beatcop: Actually, no - because if the thug had escalated to physical assault, I would have been...

...attacked by a physically superior person...

I would do everything to back out of it. In this case, turning my back and running from this younger, stronger, faster guy - leaving my wife and grandson behind - would not have been a reasonable option in my mind.

After doing everything to de-escalate, had he come at me with force, I would have responded with greater force.


My response to coloradokevin's excellent questions:

1) Could you have de-escalated the situation if you reached for your cellphone, stating that you were calling the police?

Once he was closing ground between us I thought (and still think) that I only had time to put my hand on my pistol and put up my right hand in a "peace" (or "stop") gesture while watching his eyes and hands. It was happening fast at that point.

2) Could you have just ignored him completely and left the dog park?

Yes and No. I realized after it was over that ignoring him - and NOT making any comments - would have been preferable. However, he was between us and the exit, so leaving wasn't an option. My mistake was thinking this was a "normal" encounter with the chance to inform a new dog owner of the rules of the park for our mutual benefit (and admittedly letting my annoyance influence my behavior). As Little Bigman pointed out correctly, the likelihood of "teaching" another adult what they already know and have chosen to ignore - is between slim and none.

3) Did you decide to stand your ground due to concerns over your family's safety, or were they better protected by a tactical retreat?

Yes and No. Turning my back when I saw him coming at me did not seem like a good idea. At that point a tactical retreat (leaving my family behind) was also not a good option in my mind.

4) If the guy walked up to you and pushed you, how would you have handled that scenario? Would you have taken a step back and tried to remove yourself from the situation? Would you have responded in kind, would you have maybe exposed your guy, drawn your gun, or perhaps even fired your weapon?

Before my wife unwisely intervened (and she admits now it was unwise), I was about to tell him, "...stay back, there is nothing further to discuss, I'm sorry if you are upset, let's just forget it" - while backing away.

If he had rushed me with the intent to do harm, my left arm would have attempted to fend him off, while my right hand came up shooting. Too many people end up permanently injured or killed in uneven encounters similar to this. I do NOT intend to be one of them.

I should add that I am a 58-year-old peaceful, non-violent ex-hippy. He was probably 25 years younger and had the look of a violent offender who has spent time working out in various prison yards.

5) Can you consider other intermediate force options for future use (ex: pepper spray)?

In a word - No. My force continuum includes:
1.) Talk my way out of it.
2.) Back or run my way out of it.
3.) Shoot to stop a violent assault.

6) Would your possible response have been different had your family not been present?

I honestly don't think so in this case.


uh-oh makes several excellent points:

...you must swallow ALL of you pride immediately, otherwise you have not done your part of de-escalation. That means body language AND verbal language.

and...

...Having her [the wife] trying to act as intermediary without her having been trained is a real danger for the both of you.

My wife readily admits that her fear and anger got the best of her.


Thank you all for your observations and questions.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top