Let me hunt for free, you jerk

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't see letting people hunt on my land any different to letting people take the honey from a natural hive. In both instances the creature is on my property and using my resources, although they also might use someone elses. While it's on my property, it's my choice how to deal with it.

If I don't have the right to charge people to shoot 'public' animals, do I have the right to shoot them myself? What about predators that roam? Can I not shoot a fox because it's not mine?
 
I find a lot of this thread more than a little ridiculous.

This is hypothetical, since I do not personally own any hunting land. If I own some property, and I decide to let someone use it for ANY purpose, I can place contractual restrictions and/or conditions on that use (so long as the restrictions or conditions are legal). Therefore, if I state in a lease contract that you are going to pay me $10 per acre per year for the right to hunt dove and quail on my property, and that you are specifically prohibited from killing deer with the penalty being a $1000 fine and termination of the lease, that is perfectly legal (and ethical). If I state in the lease that you can hunt deer, but you and your guests have the right to kill no more than five deer total, subject to the same penalties, that's also perfectly legal (and ethical). If I state that you have the right to hunt deer but must pay a $200 fee per deer shot, that's also perfectly legal (and ethical). It's my land, I can make the conditions I want, and you have the right to agree to them or refuse them. If you agree to them, you are bound by them. If you refuse them, you don't get the lease.

I do belong to a hunting club (deer and duck) in East Texas in which I am a fourth-generation member. My great-grandfather helped found it in the 30's. It's a big property, but there are also a lot of members, and if every member shot whatever they wanted, the deer population would be decimated and the hunting would get pretty bad pretty fast. As a result, each member (and any of that member's guests) are limited to a certain number of deer per year, to the tune of several does/spikes and one "trophy buck." If you exceed the numbers, you pay a fine. This discourages overharvesting. These restrictions are reasonable and necessary. If everyone were free to just hunt however they wanted to, there wouldn't be anything left to hunt there.

One thing to note is that many of the places in Texas which are not leased, but are "pay to hunt" for a day or a weekend, are large properties, high-fenced to keep outside animals out and inside animals in, and stocked at heavy expense with nonnative game. A great deal of money is also spent managing said nonnative game. The business of these places is spending a lot of money on exotic game, then having hunters pay to come hunt said exotic game.

You can say you think that there should be plenty of land available to the public for hunting. Great, I don't disagree. You can say there should be places people should be able to hunt for free. Great, I don't disagree. However, I have no responsibility to open my property to anyone who wants to come hunt on it.

A part of the reason that most of the land in Texas is privately owned is that almost all of it has been historically productive or developable. As a result, all of it got claimed or purchased and used or developed. In places like Colorado that have a very high public land ratio, there are lots of big craggy mountain areas that are nice to look at but not really good for farming, ranching, developing as towns or cities, etc., so no one ever claimed them.
 
I glanced at this, and knew it had to be about Texas. Too many pages to read though. High costs will cause this to be the last hunting generation in Texas though.
 
High costs will cause this to be the last hunting generation in Texas though.
No, because the land owners charge what the market will bear. If someone is willing to pay $5,000 a year to hunt, that's what they'll get. If no one is willing to pay, the price will drop.

As much as I don't like the idea of paying $5,000 a year to hunt, the landowner has no obligation to cut me a deal. I'm fortunate that I have private land I can hunt for free, but if not you have to pay the freight.
 
No, because the land owners charge what the market will bear. If someone is willing to pay $5,000 a year to hunt, that's what they'll get. If no one is willing to pay, the price will drop.

That's only true if you ignore the fact that the majority of hunters start as kids, and high costs are keeping many kids from starting in Texas. Too easy to play select baseball. Every poll shows the total number of hunters dropping fast. I don't know how it is in Indiana though, maybe it's exploding with kids and guns. Since I don't live there, I will refrain from speculating.
 
I wonder how much of this drop in the number of hunters is based more on our shift from an agrarian society to a service based one. It used to be that farming was a big employer in this country. With the shift from small human powered farms to mechanized "superfarms" it is like a small industrial revolution in the last 20 years. We used to grow corn, cotton, and raise cattle, but with the profit dropping to the point of it almost not being worth it to do it on such a small scale (about 200 acres total) compared to what we were making from hunting leases on our timber farm we stopped. The corn fields are now hay fields we run dove hunts on, while the cotton was turned to pasture and people now lease it for grazing land. I think I will be the last generation to have seen cows and cotton on our property. Hunting has gone from a way of life and nature's meat isle, to a hobby.
 
That's only true if you ignore the fact that the majority of hunters start as kids, and high costs are keeping many kids from starting in Texas. Too easy to play select baseball. Every poll shows the total number of hunters dropping fast. I don't know how it is in Indiana though, maybe it's exploding with kids and guns. Since I don't live there, I will refrain from speculating.

Well then, if the market falls apart due to not enough demand, it will be a self correcting problem. That is the beauty of capitalism.

All this whining about not allowing folks to hunt on private property for free reminds me of the Sign Sign Everywhere a sign...what gives you the right to fence me out and fence mother nature in? Its called a land title.
 
I think that the cost has a lot to do with the decline in hunting. Families do more together more now than in the past. I know that I couldn't afford to take my kids hunting at the (exorbitant) prices that the folks in Texas seem to be charging.

There is still a lot of public land in the area where I live but it is getting farther and farther away. Scouting an area before a hunt is an additional expense (both time and fuel). My son wants to hunt this year but our local gunshow is on opening weekend and he would rather spend the day selling stuff with dad (he's saving for a revolver) than go out on opening day. Maybe we'll hit late buck season.
 
There were not as many public hunting areas when I was growing up in the 60s as we have now. I don't think a city kid is going to find hunting regardless of era. I grew up in a rural community and knew people and found some small game and dove hunting by asking, but the two land owners on whose land I hunted only let me and a few kids they knew hunt on it. That wasn't for deer or anything, either.

I don't think things have changed all that much in Texas except the costs of leases. I remember when my grandpa got out of his lease in Leaky, Texas, big ranch in the hill country. He was POed. Price had gone up to $125 a gun, just ridiculous. LOL! That was a lot of money, then, though. Wages are roughly 6 times higher now days in the chemical plants where he worked. Lease prices have exceeded that by a bit. You won't find a lease like that one in Texas for $750 a gun, more like a couple of grand. So, yeah, it's gotten more expensive, but really it could be worse. We have a lot more public hunting now, at least in east Texas and along the coast for ducks and state wide for dove, than we had when I was a kid.
 
As a landowner this thread and some of the attitudes got me pretty sturred up . In fact i decided to post all our land as NO HUNTING . On reflection tho I am still posting all the ground , but will post it as Hunting by Written Permission ONLY . Now we still wont charge to hunt , but the free for all is over . Ill let some folks hunt some of the time . Folks who strongly feel its the states game and they have a right to shoot it need not apply at all . A few will still hunt on us , and occationaly someone new will get a slip , but all who just want to kill game , and all who show they think they " should " be able to hunt on us can just get the hell gone . No one will be charged a cent to hunt , but if its so much as i dont like how you are dressed you wont be hunting on us . If your one of the entitlement crowd well just deal with it .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK... interesting thread with a lot of good points.


It seems that the thread has a uniform understanding that private land is private land-- and that no one is entitled to make use of it except the landowner. Anyone given permission to hunt on it has received a gift or has paid some kind of compensation for that permission.

That's great. I truly wish more people were as rational as THR members.


So, I say this not to THR members. I am not even making a case. I thought I'd tell a short-ish story of how my family's land in MS became Posted.


This land has been in our family for literally around 200 years. Our family had been on this land years before Mississippi became a state at all (we came as Methodist missionaries to the Choctaw Indians.)

For years, people in this area had free-run on our property. It became common for a lot of people from as far as 30 or 40 miles would come into our community and onto our land to hunt.

Even though we didn't have any particular master-plan, we never intended people from outside of our community-- strangers if you will-- to come in and do as they please to our land.

Over the years even the strangers became to see a sense of "entitlement" to hunting on our land because they had done so for so long.

Never mind the fact that WE paid the taxes on the land every year. Never mind that WE paid to upkeep the roads.

Two events caused our land to be offically Posted in 1978.


First.


My grandfather drove up "Above the Dam." (there used to be a dam making a lake larger.) He came up to one of our lakes during Duck Season. The lake literally was COVERED with floating shotgun shells from the duck hunters. They had left-- and left the lake littered with thier empty hulls floating in the water. He spent two days scooping them out in a boat with a net-- in the dead winter. Never mind the trash that they would throw out on the road or where they parked.

Incidently, when we broke the artificial dam that had been put up years ago (we broke it to make more dry land for deer hunting.), we actually had strangers who never even asked to be on our land calling my father and screaming at him for "ruining their duck hunting."



Second.


Just prior to our Posting our land, my father did what he routinely did during deer season. He went to his favorite planted field (yes, we paid for and planted it). This particular one was great is he was running late because it didn't take as long to get to. Because of this, he hunted it often.

As he is sitting one day on his stand, he notices movement about 25 feet up a tree on the other side of the deer plot. As he scopes it, he realizes that someone ACTUALLY put up a crappy deerstand on the opposite side of Dad's own deer plot. What was worse is that if he fired, he would have fired directly AT my father in his deer stand!!!(Which was a free-standing -- obvious stand)


It gets better.


Dad yelled to the guy and told him to get out of the stand immediately-- and that he had his rifle trained on him-- so don't do anything threatening.

The guy left.

Immediately, Dad went and got an axe and tore the deerstand out of the tree. Later that night, it seems that the man went back-- only to discover his stand was torn down.

He actually had the nerve to call my father and curse him out for destroying the stand instead of allowing him to come back and get it down! As Dad informed him, he never offered to pay for the cost of planting the plot he was using-- and never considered my father's safety. He hung up on him.


Right after that event, Dad Posted our land.


But it wasn't over.


Because so many of these people felt entitled to our land, they felt that WE wronged THEM by preventing them from what was "rightfully" theirs to use.

We had gated and locked our road. Practically every day, we would find that someone had poured Crazy Glue in our lock. This was bad because there were other landowners that needed a key to the lock, and there was a couple companies that came in. It would not be possible to simply put another lock on until the other people had keys.

In the minds of those people wishing to come in, this was a way to FORCE use to unlock our gate-- even if it was temporary.


To combat this, my father finally bought several CASES of locks keyed just alike at considerable cost. Now, a lock could be replaced immediately.


But that did not prevent gluing the locks.


To add insult to injury, practically every time we would go in our property, we would find rotting, dead animals such as dogs and deer hung over our gate.


Calling the sheriff was practically a useless effort. It wasn't something they could devote manpower to, and not a thing that they would "stake out." We just had to deal with it.

That changed when my mother decided to take a day off and sit in the woods overlooking the gate with a thermos full of coffee and a 30-06.

Sometime around 11 AM, she watched a guy come up and glue our lock. In the age prior to cell phones, she held him at gunpoint until someone came by that she could send to call the sheriff.

We prosecuted this person and he ended up with a bit of Jail time. This news spread like fire and soon the instances became less frequent, and finally ended.


It took that-- and about 3 years of fighting-- for the RIGHT to Post OUR land.



So I not only have NO pity for anyone that thinks that they are entitled to use ANYONE'S land without expressed permission, I have ABSOLUTE distain for anyone that does such a thing.

And I hope anyone who suggests that we have a "responsibility" to let people on our land, or anyone who suggests that we are unethical for it, re-read the efforts we went through only to assert OUR claim to our own land.

If that doesn't convince them, they know where they can go.


Sadly, those that many would normally have no problems letting hunt on their lands had their shot blown in many cases by those that disrespect the landowner, trash the land, or kill indiscriminately. Yet, the LANDOWNER is the one that they blame for their misfortune-- because he is a stationary target. They should probably save some (99.9999%) of their anger for their own hunting buddies.



-- John
 
im in the "its their land, they can do pretty much whatever they want with it" camp. but, as far as leasing land killing hunting in texas, i can definitely see it happening. the people talking about the free market are right to an extent. the problem is that the lag time in pricing may well kill the sport. most young people cant afford to pay for a land lease, so these young people have a higher chance of never even starting to hunt. if they dont start when they are young, theres a higher chance they wont start when they get older. so the situation that is created, is a massive fluctuation that the market will not predict. at some point that "wall" between the older, more financially stable hunters and the younger hunters who cant afford to lease is going to be hit, and, imo, hunting as a major hobby will have a hard time bouncing back. this of course is not the only factor, but it is a major one. when you have a sport or hobby that is detiorating due to the internet and tv or w/e, making it harder to get into, especially at a young age, will be very detramental in the long run.

what can be done about it? honestly, im not sure. as i stated at the beginning of my post, whether we like it or not, private land is private land. no sense in whining about it. until a strong majority of land owners feelings or perceptions toward hunting change, we are going to continue down this path. likewise, until a strong majority of hunters attitudes (such as respect for property, etc.) change, land owners are going to continue down the same path. i suppose the best thing to do is to take individual responsibility for our own actions as land owners and hunters, try to educate others in proper respect for property, and my teacher just starting talking and i lost my train of thought :eek: anyway, i think you get the jist of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top