someguy2800
Member
I don't think the rugers have bad triggers, its just not nearly as good as a buckmark. As with most things its easily addressed if you really have your heart set on one.
I would say the Rugers are usable out of the box, but the upgrades make them outstanding. I will grant you that the Browning is superior out of the box, but a Ruger with upgrades leapfrogs over it and comes out ahead. That said, the best "bang for the buck" (See what I did there? ) is a Browning with the Heggis Flip and an overtravel-adjustable trigger. But a Volquartsen-ized Ruger is the best target pistol you can get without spending over $1000 for a S&W 41.I dislike the idea of buying an expensive (compared to the Browning and S&W) gun and then having to spend MORE money to make it useble. That's not right.
One neat trick with a buckmark is if you just take the grips and slide stop off you will see the sear spring right at the top of the frame. Just take its pin out, flip the spring upside down, and put the pin back in, and boom, you have a 2lb trigger. Takes 10 minutes and is free.
Well I did the spring flip on my Buck Mark and wow what a difference. Checked with my Lyman digital gauge and the trigger pull went from 4 lbs down to 1lb 9oz. Checked it several times to be sure and that’s what it is now.
There is just a very tiny amount of trigger creep that is really nothing. Can’t wait to try it out when I get a chance.
Thanks for the tip Someguy.
I'll take the stupid label also. Had a Hi-Standard Victor with box, papers, factory target, etc. I wasn't using it and decided to sell it to a co-worker. DUMB move. He told me for years after how it was the nicest gun he'd ever shot and would never sell it. Just what I wanted to hear.I shoot a Ruger MK3 Target w/bull barrel. has never failed to fire or go into battery in 1000's of rounds. I clean it about every brick or so but not a complete strip detailed cleaning. It is more accurate than I am by far. Had a S&W 22A that was the most accurate 22 pistol I ever shot. It did not like cheap ammo nor would it shoot CCI Stinger for hunting (would rupture a rim about every 10th round fired) With CCI Mini Mag or target ammo it was the cats meow. Sold it to get a 1911 GSG 22. MAJOR screw up on my part. MAJOR SCREW UP! STUPID STUPID STUPID.
I just looked at one of these, but they wanted $850 for it.You might try looking for a Smith and Wesson revolver on the used market.
My model 18-4 shown below cost less than the GP-100 you mentioned, but that was five years ago. Not sure what they go for today.
Super accurate and trouble free.
View attachment 788497
An excellent and beautiful gun. Superb quality. I had one for a short while but just didn’t like it. Too heavy for me. Too front heavy for me, hard to keep on target. Too slow to load and unload. A PITA to clean. (Don’t bother telling me it didn’t need cleaning. I don’t roll that way.) Reminded me of the joke about the two happiest days in a boat owner’s life: the day he bought the boat and the day he sold it. That was me and the Single Six.
7.5 inch barrel. I know everything you wrote. I still didn’t like it.There is a good reason for that weight. With the ability to change cylinders between .22LR and .22 Mag, the extra weight of the 6" barrel helps keep the "flip" caused by the Mags at negligible levels. With the LR rounds, the gun barely moves.
That's an interesting trade-off. Having lived in AK almost 13 yrs now, I've learned to take durability over almost anything else every time.View attachment 790627 I have good experiences with my Browning Buck Marks also.
I tend to think my Ruger MK II is more durable but the Brownings are a bit more accurate?