And a 30/30 will never be a .357 it lacks the versatility. And BTW your sig line should read "a marksman" not "a marksmen"All I was saying was that a .357 can never be a 30-30.
And a 30/30 will never be a .357 it lacks the versatility. And BTW your sig line should read "a marksman" not "a marksmen"All I was saying was that a .357 can never be a 30-30.
That eliminates any long range hunting purpose. Which is the only advantage a 30/30 has and the only real limitation to a 357.Know this, this will be for when I'm camping or rovin around in the woods only, no hunting whatsoever will be done with these guns.
That'd work too paired with a trapper length 44 mag Mmmmm good.I am past the point of being torn now. I did in fact like the suggestion of carrying a .22lr with a carbine though,being as i already have a single action .22 it would save some money.
Rossi Puma (20") in .454 Casull & Ruger Super Redhawk (7.5") revolver in .454 Casull.I thought OP meant a combination lever/revolver gun, that would be pretty interesting.
I guess if you can't hit the side of a barn with the revolver or the rifle that would be true.Any handgun cartridge is a weak compared to a rifle cartridge. Chamber a handgun cartridge in a rifle and you still have a weak stopper.
Since you don't reload I would revisit the 30-30. Ammunition is readily available and affordable.
As for handgun it depends on how deep your pockets are. .357 is more affordable and you have the option of shooting .38's
I shoot a lot of 45 Colt but it is a reloaders cartridge for best performance and cost savings.