Sgt.Murtaugh
Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 245
OP - you do realize that gun dealers (not all) are some of the dumbest people on the planet, right?
Yes, it is probably Stewart, and he has clarified that he is staunchly pro-RKBA. In Utah, even the liberals are well armed, voting for any anti-Constitutional legislation would be political suicide here.He's probably talking about Stewart. He has since clarified his stance. He said that the interview in the Tribune (I think) left out parts that were important for the context of his statement. I don't know him personally, but I have several fiends who do and they've said he's about as pro-RKBA as they come.
I don't even think Matheson would vote for anything new, but I haven't heard anything from him. That leaves Bishop and Chaffetz, both of which are strongly on our side.
I could not have stated it better. "We the people" has gotten lost somewhere long the line. If you even use the phrase in front of a politician, watch the knowing smirk that they try to hide.When are people going to realize that the issue here isn't what party controls what? It's not a party thing, it's an overgrown, greedy government and a weak willed, apathetic majority population that is the problem.
It isn't Dems vs. Reps. It's not conservatives vs. liberals- It's lying, thieving, traitorous politicians vs. We The People.
OP - you do realize that gun dealers (not all) are some of the dumbest people on the planet, right?
Regarding how Congress works, which was mentioned earlier. 233 Republicans. 200 Democrats in the House. 17 Republicans have to jump the party and agree to a ban. I already have found two. One from Utah and Peter King from NY. They only need 15 more in the House if all Democrats vote along the party line.
what's worse believing the LGS who makes a living selling guns or believing anonymous posters on-line.I was just in a local shop and was told by one of the folks in there that AR's were going to be banned 2/1. It was stated "it hadn't been made public yet".
Obviously I don't believe this was anything more than a sales tactic, I just wonder if anyone else has had similar methods employed with them.
They need 60% to be filibuster proof so they would need 260 votes in favor to get un-obstructed passage.
When Canada started their gun registry in the 90s it ran billions over budget and they recently had to scrap it due to cost.
Im in New Market let me know which shop told you that, even though I have a very good idea after you said reloading supplies.
Also I can give you the name of a really great dealer if your willing to drive to Athens.
Under what legal precedents? We still have checks and balances in this country. Obama cannot just declare something as law. Even one with the most basic understanding of our legal system knows that's simply not how things work. Even an executive order could only modify enforcement of existing laws and not enact wholly new ones. This idea that Obama can just do as he pleases with no repercussion is not only false, but distracts people from the real issues at hand. It seems pretty defeatist to say "Obama is gonna Obama, and there's not a darn thing you can do about it". Not only is it defeatist, but its rooted in pure fantasy. NO ONE can simply declare a ban and that's that. Instead of screaming the sky is falling, how about we work togetehr to ensure that that doesn't happen...everLook for Holder or Obama to declare a ban and not much can be done