However it's worth having. How many of our reloading manuals are cheap? With the properties of the components we're working with can we really have too much information?Well that ain't a cheap book!
However it's worth having. How many of our reloading manuals are cheap? With the properties of the components we're working with can we really have too much information?Well that ain't a cheap book!
I looked at Hodgdon's hazmat sheet and I failed to extract any useful data. Seems like it shouldn't be a big secret. Nitro content seems discussed often, inhibitors almost never....Check the nitro content by % and if it is higher than something like TiteGroup with the same or lower % retardant then I think a standard primer is fine. If it’s got more retardant switch to magnum.
No.11FS is supposed to be W296’s more civilized twin brother, WC297. I keep thinking about giving it a try, then my arthritis acts up and I decide different.
I have 2 pounds of #11FS, purchased a couple years ago to use in carbine loads. Haven't even cracked the seal yet.Want to see who gets around to it first... I'll give you the advantage of every other powder I'm testing first and longshot that I don't have yet.
With what bullet? I have a Hornet, some lilgun and some rem 6-1/2's....I don’t really use Lilgun much but 13 grains of it in .22 Hornet makes it 1/3 MOA accurate at 100 yards. I use Remington 6 1/2’s for them.
I realize there is some difference, but their application windows almost Mirror one another identically.
I'm mostly saying because Lil Gun and WW296/H-110 are made by the same company.You would likely have to include 2400 and IMR4227 in there, too.
I always joked it was the magnum tightgroupYou would likely have to include 2400 and IMR4227 in there, too... and probably some others. Granted, W296/H110 work a bit differently, and then LilGun as well (because of the high nitro content.)
Playing with figures in QuickLoad... LilGun burns more completely than W296, all else being equal, in a 20" barrel, which probably explains the touch higher velocity and less flash some are mentioning. LilGun is one of those powders that burns better at the top end of pressure as well.
I'll leave all that LilGun for you guys, however... I'm not a big fan of TiteGroup, because of the high nitro content, and it sounds like LilGun is the same.
With what bullet? I have a Hornet, some lilgun and some rem 6-1/2's....
I always joked it was the magnum tightgroup
Lil gun gave me better results pushing the 180 than a 158 in a 20" barrel.I'm very curious now if lil gun is a double pressure peak powder. There are a lot of cool things they are doing with deterants and the double peak is a feature of the modern doublebase powder. One does not need a higher peak to get more velocity if one can grow the total length of the pressure event while the projectile is being pushed. It also would explain why the change in powder charge did not increase velocity in a meaningful way in the 10" test barrel. Meaning that barrel length is more of a limiting factor for speed than charge weight.
I'm only using a 16" but I will be favoring a heavy. This is probably a one and done pound, but I had to see for myself. Thinking it's best applied in hunting where speed equals ethical kills not paper and high volume.Lil gun gave me better results pushing the 180 than a 158 in a 20" barrel.
It definitely shines when you use a long barrel and heavy bullets.
I'm curious what your results will be.
I went back to H110 because I like it better in my revolver and have a load that works in both.
I agree on both counts.I'm only using a 16" but I will be favoring a heavy. This is probably a one and done pound, but I had to see for myself. Thinking it's best applied in hunting where speed equals ethical kills not paper and high volume.
Want to see who gets around to it first...  I'll give you the advantage of every other powder I'm testing first and longshot that I don't have yet. 
It's my very first taste of this bullet and this powder so I'll be easing into her gently. I don't always practice what we preach but in a double variable I'm a lot more cautious. I looked up Hornadays oal out of their manual and they say 1.590 which would be good, except there cannalure isn't there. I went 1.585 but I could/should go deaper.I am just asking out of curiosity because I don’t hunt so this is certainly just for my information but why not 13.5, 14 and 14.5 grains vs. 13, 13.3, 13.6. A spicier meatball is what’s in my head..
The general rule of thumb is, crimp in the groove/canelure if present. The book OAL is based on their trim length.It's my very first taste of this bullet and this powder so I'll be easing into her gently. I don't always practice what we preach but in a double variable I'm a lot more cautious. I looked up Hornadays oal out of their manual and they say 1.590 which would be good, except there cannalure isn't there. I went 1.585 but I could/should go deaper.View attachment 1131040
I'm very curious now if lil gun is a double pressure peak powder. There are a lot of cool things they are doing with deterants and the double peak is a feature of the modern doublebase powder. One does not need a higher peak to get more velocity if one can grow the total length of the pressure event while the projectile is being pushed. It also would explain why the change in powder charge did not increase velocity in a meaningful way in the 10" test barrel. Meaning that barrel length is more of a limiting factor for speed than charge weight.
Their trim is .005 longer so that's a little bit. I'll probably be single loading these at first....I know my marlin loves 1.585 so that's good at least. With the bearing surface on the 180 I have plenty of neck tensionThe general rule of thumb is, crimp in the groove/canelure if present. The book OAL is based on their trim length.
It's a burn curve where there is more than one peek pressure event and in some powders the second peak is higher... I was quite surprised to learn about it. If you want I'll track down the video.What is a double peak pressure powder?