loading for the 204

Status
Not open for further replies.

Damon555

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
1,050
Location
Not really where I wanna be
I started this subject yesterday in the rifle forum but figured it would be more of a reloading topic so I'll post further results here.......

Since my testing didn't go well with Varget and 39 grain sierra blitzkings in my TC Encore Pro hunter barrel I went to the reloading shop today and picked up a couple more powders to try. Of the many choices I had I went with a pound each of H4895 and RE10x. Both shot better on average than the Varget did but H4895 seemed to shoot the best....Now keep in mind since I was testing some new powders I only loaded 3 sets of 3 to get an idea on where my pressure signs will start showing up. Each load was .5 grains more than the previous one. Here are some of the results.

The first test groups I shot were a 39 grain blitzking pushed along with some H4895. The first group missed the target so I didn't get a pic of it....needless to say it was the worst of the bunch @ 1.325"

Here is a picture of the second group.....the wind was blowing pretty good so I did the best I could but it was showing up a little in the groups. Things tightened up considerable over the first group....this one measured .750"

2-8-121.jpg

My 3rd and final group showed even more promise coming in @ .670"

2-8-122.jpg

My testing with RE10x showed some vertical stringing with all the groups. I was pretty chilly by this time and I could have probably done better....but they are what they are....This was the best of the bunch @ .880"

2-8-123.jpg

The 2 other groups with RE10x were a little bigger but not by much and the vertical stringing persisted. It appears that H4895 is showing the most promise. The velocities are right in line with the manuals and I'm not seeing any signs of excess pressure. The RE10x loads were starting to flatten the primers at a lower average velocity than H4895 so I'll be giving the latter more scrutiny with 5 shot groups and COL testing.

I also ran some more rounds through my Remington SPS 204. Since my velocity numbers were pretty low compared to the manual and there were no pressure signs with a 32 grain V-max I bumped the load of WC844 up .5 grains and shot a 5 shot group. I didn't gain much velocity but I was able to shoot a group that was roughly 1/4" smaller than the one I tested yesterday.

Here is that group....this was 5 shots measuring in @ .775" Since I have a few pounds of this powder left this will be the load combination that I load up for my varmint rounds in this rifle......

2-8-124.jpg

All the groups were shot @ 100 yards. Cool and windy doesn't bode well with concentration so I'll be revisiting the most accurate of these loads.
 
Last edited:
What type of fps for the 32 gr V-Max? I have really been impressed with the 32 gr SBKs pushing over 4,000 fps using RL 10x. I have never been able to approach the accuracy of these using the 39 or 40 gr bullets.
 
What type of fps for the 32 gr V-Max? I have really been impressed with the 32 gr SBKs pushing over 4,000 fps using RL 10x. I have never been able to approach the accuracy of these using the 39 or 40 gr bullets.
I'm running right around 3900 with the 32 grain Vmaxes Brian. From the looks of the cases and primers I could probably step it up a bit but I'm not one to chase 100 fps. I'll probably test some in that range but unless accuracy is much better I won't change anything.......
 
BrainOnSigs said:
I have really been impressed with the 32 gr SBKs pushing over 4,000 fps using RL 10x. I have never been able to approach the accuracy of these using the 39 or 40 gr bullets.

I agree......... Reloder 10X + 32gr Blitzkings= great results
 
After my stash of WC844 is gone I'll be looking for another powder for the 32 grainers....RE10x will be in the running. It will probably perform better than the WC844 but I'd like to use that stuff up.
 
Don't overlook H322. My Savage seems to group well with about any of the correct powders with 32 grainers, better with this one...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top