stchman
Member
I've had no experience with the Taurus PT92, but can you site examples of where Canik guns are "badly" built? You do know that Canik builds firearms for the Turkish military?The reason I am not interested in a Taurus is that they are on the the lower end of mid range quality (their most popular gun, the PT-92 is a Beretta clone). The reason I don't want a Canik isn't because it's badly built, it's because it's not as well built as my Sig. The reason I instantly look to Sig and H&K when choosing a carry gun is that nobody argues that they are of high quality, and they don't have product recalls.
Everyone always talks about how über safe striker guns are, but I just don't buy it. People also like how simple they are to operate, and a DA/SA gun is no different. There are exactly three controls on my 226: mag release, slide stop, and decocker. The difference is I trust the long and heavy (but smooth) double action pull, more than a short and stiff double action pull . Of course, after the double action pull comes a nice, crisp 4 pound trigger pull. That being said, if I had to carry and shoot a pistol that incorporated the long mushy trigger from a mosin-nagant I could do, and shoot it fairly accurately, but the great part about a saturated gun market is I don't have to!
I know there are plenty of excellent and reliable striker fired handguns on the market, but I don't want them. I have an FN FNS that I like a lot, but I just don't desire to shoot it as much as my Sig. All the striker fired guns I tried have, what I would consider to be, a lackluster trigger. I have no doubt that I can shoot my FNS about as accurately as my Sig, but the desire to practice with it isn't as strong. As we all know: practice makes perfect.
Another thing to consider is that I want a gun of some substance, not something that looks like a toy, for the reasons shown in the thread "Have you ever needed your carry gun?" http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=767811 . This thread proves that you are more likely to draw and scare away a would-be threat than actually have to shoot him. Don't take this the wrong way, but an attacker is going to be more intimidated by my P226 than your LCP.
I'm not trying to discredit any striker gun or anybody's carry preference with this post. If I'm not mistaken, the Ruger LCP is the best selling pistol in the world right now. However, as a free man, I can choose to not to do what everyone else does, because I found a system that works better for me.
As far as your P226 "scaring" off a would be attacker while my LCP would not, I think you've been watching too many movies. There is no evidence to support that criminals are less scared of a smaller pocket pistol. The LCP is the choice of many LEOs as a BUG.
You buy and carry what you wish, but you did come here and ASK for opinions, and that's what you are going to get. It almost sounds like you wanted us to validate your choice of the P226. Don't let pre-conceived notions or something your buddy said make the decision for you. I chose my carry gun as my CCW instructor and other instructors have said that the LCP is a good choice.