M&P Shield 380 EZ

Status
Not open for further replies.
The 11-lb. DA trigger is potentially the PK380's biggest impediment. People who have difficulty racking slides are not likely to want heavy DA trigger pulls...

I agree. My wife’s SOP with hers (a home gun, I’m trying to get her to carry) is:

1. Load a magazine,
2. cock the external hammer,
3. rack in a round (very easy to rack in that manner with no hammer resistance),
4. flip the safety forward to fire position (the safety is not a decocker, hammer stays cocked)
5. fire in SA,
6. At slide lock, drop mag, load mag, rack slide, & repeat

She very seldom shoots in DA due to heavier trigger pull.

I’m not thrilled with the PK380, but it’s her choice. And the Walther P22 is her favorite plinker. As I posted earlier, maybe she’ll change to the Shield EZ one day.
 
Last edited:
Please- do not consider ANY .380 with ANY load to be a reliable bear gun.
Two considerations with bears are thick skulls and layers of fat, both of which completely disregard water jug results. :)
Denis
 
Any more reviews on this?

I have a female relative who is in the market now for a firearm. We haven't gone shooting yet but she is very petite, with very small hands. This seems like a gun she might want to try
 
I shot a sample last week.
Accuracy not as good as expected, but do-able at 10 yards.
No reliability problems with several different commercial loads.

Annoying to load, the follower buttons were mildly painful. :)
Good sights.
Trigger passable.
Denis
 
I have been wanting to get back with a range report for a while, but the truth is she has not allowed me much trigger time to give an evaluation. So I had her sit down and write out one in her perspective.



This range report is from personal experience and does not reflect how everyone may feel about this weapon.

I normally shoots a Taurus PT-638 .380 caliber. This is not a compact .380. It is 24 ounces and carries a double stack magazine. My wrists are small and have the beginnings of arthritis. This has been a great weapon for me as it has the full grip and allows a solid grip on the weapon. The slide on this weapon is very hard for to maneuver.

The new Smith & Wesson M&P .380 Shield EZ is lighter and still has the full grips allowing me to keep a strong hold on the weapon. I like the weight as it does not hurt my wrist. On a single range visit, I shoot between 150 to 200 rounds without any pain or soreness.

The slide has a ridged grip on the back with multiple grooves that helps to slide it back. Even without these, the slide itself is very easy to maneuver. Once a bullet is chambered it has an indicator on the slide that allows you to know there is a round ready to fire. The weapon will not fire until the safety is engaged by holding onto the handle and pushing into the weapon with the pressure necessary.

So far I have only fired the weapon at 7 yards and have found it to be accurate. This is a good thing for concealed carry. We will later try it at further range to check for further accuracy. The sights are the standard white spot sights. We did not have to change it so we have no information on the ability to move it. It was accurate straight out of the box.

It does have a single stack 8 magazine. There is one button on each side of the magazine to hold down for better access to load the weapon. These buttons are slightly on the small side and is rough on the fingers to hold down as you load the magazine. We have a Maglula universal double stack magazine reloader and this works without any problems to reload it.

The only problem so far is that if you limp wrist the weapon and do not push the back safety in fully it does FTF. This can cause one of two issues. Either a stove pipe effect or the unspent cartridge will be fully ejected. Other than this small issue, which I will learn to correct myself on, I feel this is a great weapon for anyone, men or women, to have for a concealed carry.

It is a stark difference between the two weapons. Even though they are both .380, the Smith & Wesson is a narrower and lighter frame. It also has less recoil which does make for a difference in shooting. I am use to recoil from the Taurus and this weapon has virtually none. I tend to try to compensate for perceived recoil that is not actually there.

We will try to give more of an update as we use the weapon more. We tend to go shooting every weekend so I will get a better feel for it and become more accustomed to the weapon. I have put over 5000 rounds through my Taurus and am in complete sync with her. This one may take me a minute or two to get to know better.
 
RMH,

Thanks for sharing the info you have.

S&W has a great thing going with the M&P series of pistols, especially the Shield variants. I’ll encourage my wife to consider the EZ.
 
I have been wanting to get back with a range report for a while, but the truth is she has not allowed me much trigger time to give an evaluation. So I had her sit down and write out one in her perspective.

It shows.... in a good way. It comes across as genuine.

She seems more focused on knowing her gun more than gun lingo. She gives her impression of the gun rather than try to impress the reader.
 
I have been wanting to get back with a range report for a while, but the truth is she has not allowed me much trigger time to give an evaluation. So I had her sit down and write out one in her perspective.



This range report is from personal experience and does not reflect how everyone may feel about this weapon.

I normally shoots a Taurus PT-638 .380 caliber. This is not a compact .380. It is 24 ounces and carries a double stack magazine. My wrists are small and have the beginnings of arthritis. This has been a great weapon for me as it has the full grip and allows a solid grip on the weapon. The slide on this weapon is very hard for to maneuver.

The new Smith & Wesson M&P .380 Shield EZ is lighter and still has the full grips allowing me to keep a strong hold on the weapon. I like the weight as it does not hurt my wrist. On a single range visit, I shoot between 150 to 200 rounds without any pain or soreness.

The slide has a ridged grip on the back with multiple grooves that helps to slide it back. Even without these, the slide itself is very easy to maneuver. Once a bullet is chambered it has an indicator on the slide that allows you to know there is a round ready to fire. The weapon will not fire until the safety is engaged by holding onto the handle and pushing into the weapon with the pressure necessary.

So far I have only fired the weapon at 7 yards and have found it to be accurate. This is a good thing for concealed carry. We will later try it at further range to check for further accuracy. The sights are the standard white spot sights. We did not have to change it so we have no information on the ability to move it. It was accurate straight out of the box.

It does have a single stack 8 magazine. There is one button on each side of the magazine to hold down for better access to load the weapon. These buttons are slightly on the small side and is rough on the fingers to hold down as you load the magazine. We have a Maglula universal double stack magazine reloader and this works without any problems to reload it.

The only problem so far is that if you limp wrist the weapon and do not push the back safety in fully it does FTF. This can cause one of two issues. Either a stove pipe effect or the unspent cartridge will be fully ejected. Other than this small issue, which I will learn to correct myself on, I feel this is a great weapon for anyone, men or women, to have for a concealed carry.

It is a stark difference between the two weapons. Even though they are both .380, the Smith & Wesson is a narrower and lighter frame. It also has less recoil which does make for a difference in shooting. I am use to recoil from the Taurus and this weapon has virtually none. I tend to try to compensate for perceived recoil that is not actually there.

We will try to give more of an update as we use the weapon more. We tend to go shooting every weekend so I will get a better feel for it and become more accustomed to the weapon. I have put over 5000 rounds through my Taurus and am in complete sync with her. This one may take me a minute or two to get to know better.


I too, have a PT638 and a 380 EZ (TS model). Your review, and comparison is on point. I really couldn't add anything else. Thanks for posting!
 
I know this is an old thread, but I was wondering about the extractor on the EZ...

The extractor is on the top so it's yanking brass out the top isn't that correct ? It seems like this would throw brass back in the shooter's face but from watching videos the brass goes forward and to the right.
 
The extractor is internal?


Yes but its not like a 1911's.. It is spring loaded like you would typically find on a firearm... The entire FP/Extractor/LCI reside in a removable insert. I have yet to take this insert out, cause its my wifes gun and I have not seen a parts diagram.. Just in case little pieces go flying and I have no clue where they go.. :)
 
Last edited:
I did look at the Shield 380 EZ for my wife but went with the Walther CCP instead as she found it more ergonomic. I'd imagine it's comparable in recoil with standard pressure loads but no doubt more "blasty" (that can turn off a lot of new shooters).

My wife had no problems racking the slide on the EZ, but finds the CCP easy too (being a gas-delayed pistol).

I still wouldn't mind getting a Shield EZ. The grip safety is appealing.
 
The extractor is on the top so it's yanking brass out the top isn't that correct ? It seems like this would throw brass back in the shooter's face but from watching videos the brass goes forward and to the right.
Wouldn't that be a function of how it hits the ejector?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top