Hey guys, I've finally decided to join this awesome forum.
My first post is addressing a question I've had about the m14 and m16 stock height. The AR-series type rifle have a raised stock in line with the barrel to absorb more recoil, and because of this the sights have to be raised.
Therefore my question is, how much higher does the shooter's head rest because of this stock feature? I noticed the older m14 and hunting rifle designs have a downward sloping stock, allowing for the shooter's head to be lower to the rifle and the sights to be mounted lower to the barrel.
I am not trying to bash the AR-series of rifle, I am simply just an engineering student in college trying to digest some of the tradeoffs of the design. I don't want our men to have a higher chance of getting shot, even if it is a minor 5% increased risk. My best to you all and I look forward to many future discussions here on THR. Take care. - JP
My first post is addressing a question I've had about the m14 and m16 stock height. The AR-series type rifle have a raised stock in line with the barrel to absorb more recoil, and because of this the sights have to be raised.
Therefore my question is, how much higher does the shooter's head rest because of this stock feature? I noticed the older m14 and hunting rifle designs have a downward sloping stock, allowing for the shooter's head to be lower to the rifle and the sights to be mounted lower to the barrel.
I am not trying to bash the AR-series of rifle, I am simply just an engineering student in college trying to digest some of the tradeoffs of the design. I don't want our men to have a higher chance of getting shot, even if it is a minor 5% increased risk. My best to you all and I look forward to many future discussions here on THR. Take care. - JP