Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

making an accurate pistol round?

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by ohihunter2014, Jan 12, 2018.

  1. Charliefrank

    Charliefrank Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2017
    Messages:
    364
    Having had time blocks where little to no shooting was done, I've learned a few things. It surprised me how quickly muscle memory comes right back. I've often out shot my buddy's right out of the gate. But I also wasn't quite as good as when I am shooting constantly.
     
    Demi-human likes this.
  2. ray15

    ray15 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2017
    Messages:
    394
    I've heard that before.. I think.
     
    sequins and Armored farmer like this.
  3. KYregular

    KYregular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2018
    Messages:
    58
    Consistant headstamped brass helps, but testing with various powders and OAL are a must, as well as a decent chronograph. Without a chrono you are simply guessing, while velocity info is important, I believe the MOST important data is standard deviation. If your rounds vary 50 to 100 fps (spread) your groups are not going to be tight. If you can get consistant SD in the mid teens or single digits your groups will be much, much tighter.
     
  4. Iroquois

    Iroquois Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2017
    Messages:
    63
    Location:
    East Tennessee, in the shadows of the Smokies
    Thanks for the insight, but my point is what a good rest can do. It shouldn’t matter what caliber your are shooting. Please correct me if I’m wrong.
     
    jell-dog and Walkalong like this.
  5. Iroquois

    Iroquois Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2017
    Messages:
    63
    Location:
    East Tennessee, in the shadows of the Smokies
    Thanks and I was standing on my head! Sorry for the upside down photos bit I’m still learning on this new IPAD and this forum.
     
  6. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    50,548
    Location:
    Alabama
    That's some dadgum good shooting then. :D
     
    Demi-human likes this.
  7. FROGO207

    FROGO207 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    6,763
    Location:
    Mount Desert Island Maine
    If you look around there will be one or two classic bullet/propellant combos for each handgun caliber that will turn up over and over that are inherently accurate in a lot of different handguns. They are easier to find than a good load for a rifle IMHO. First find a OAL that will feed in your semi or will provide a good crimp location for your revolver bullet. Then work up a load using a good combo of components others find accurate. Pretty simple eh?;)
     
  8. CZ9shooter

    CZ9shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,002
    I'm a little late to this thread, so maybe it has been mentioned, but for me bullet selection seems to be the prime factor in my accurate handgun rounds.

    I can get a cast, even swaged 9mm bullets to shoot pretty good, but never well as a good jacketed bullet. I use some plain types too but XTPs have been about the best for me. Plated bullets have not treated me well so far, but I have only just begun tinkering with those. Maybe my revolver just does not like them.
     
  9. Bfh_auto

    Bfh_auto Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Messages:
    227
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    I think you found accurate loads because you are shooting a 1911. :)
    In all seriousness it is the easiest thing for me to shoot but I still don't shoot a handgun as good as that. I'm happy with 4 inches as long as most of them as touching.
     
  10. Bfh_auto

    Bfh_auto Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Messages:
    227
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    I can't stand on my head let alone shoot while I'm doing it.
     
    Iroquois likes this.
  11. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    50,548
    Location:
    Alabama
    It's only 7 yards, and with a red dot. When chronographing I set the chrono at 5 and the target at 7 to get numbers and check accuracy potential. I can do it with my XDm and a red dot as well. I do prefer the 1911 overall.
     
    Iroquois and Bfh_auto like this.
  12. Bfh_auto

    Bfh_auto Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Messages:
    227
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    I use an m&p compact and shoot between 10 and 15 yds. A red dot would probably help me.
     
    Iroquois likes this.
  13. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    50,548
    Location:
    Alabama
    Once my close vision started going south I reluctantly added a red dot to a pistol. Viola, I could shoot to my potential again. Before that I thought a red dot on a pistol was a pox. Adapt, improvise, overcome. Gotta do what ya gotta do. I can still shoot iron sights "ok", but with a red dot I can aim precisely again.

    This one makes me look good, it's a tack driver. I bought it with the mount on it. I shortened the mount and added a mini dot.
    Series 80 .45 1.JPG
     
    Iroquois, Charliefrank and Bfh_auto like this.
  14. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    19,202
    Location:
    northern california
    I thought about changing the division I compete in and going with an optic, but went with a dedicated pair of shooting glasses instead. Distance for the non-domniate eye, lens of dominate eye set for the front sight and the focus center aligned with where my eye looks through the lens
     
  15. Dudedog

    Dudedog Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,155
    Location:
    Southern CA
    Thought about having a pair like that made up, but wondered if my brain could but it together.
    Was far sighted in one eye and near sighted in the other, between the two I got by with out glasses for a long time. So my brain was putting that together.
    If they are working out for you I may need to have a pair made up to try.

    Targets were sort of fuzzy, sights were ok, now targets are fuzzy, sights are fuzzy, brain is fuzzy....getting old is a pain, but the only other alternative is much worse:)
     
    Charliefrank and Tinybob like this.
  16. Iroquois

    Iroquois Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2017
    Messages:
    63
    Location:
    East Tennessee, in the shadows of the Smokies
    I feel your pain, it’s why I use a scope on my hunting revolver, vision is deteriorating.
     
  17. warnerwh

    warnerwh Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Messages:
    499
    Of course your gun needs to be accurate but in my experience bullets make the biggest difference. Tweaking the powder quantity is next.
     
    Walkalong likes this.
  18. GaryL

    GaryL Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,200
    Location:
    MN
    I have often found the upper medium loads to work best for me, but upper medium in one source could be near max or near starting in another.
    Sometimes I shoot a load more accurately freehand than one that likes to shoot from a rest. So the one with more potential doesn't do as well in the hand. Go figure. I suppose it I got out more....

    Boy, isn't that the truth. My issue is being near sighted. So glasses to see the target makes the front sight pretty fuzzy.
    I used to wonder about the guys I shot with some years back who had optics on their pistols. Not anymore.
     
    Walkalong likes this.

Share This Page