Joejojoba111
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 1,056
And here is the trade-off - I don't know the the next officer I see won't attack me, maybe intentionally or accidentally kill me. For every officer down, you will find dozens of civilians. You see, there are trade-offs in life. I have, against my will, lost precious survival possibilities, so that others may gain them. A minority, has gained power and safety, by taking it directly from the majority.
When you come across Aristotle's 'uncorruptable man', then I will agree you can make him an officer and give him all the power in the world. Until then I refuse to recognize officers as anything other than people, humans, with all the pros and cons entailed.
I cannot refuse to comply to certain modern peculiarities of detainment and such, but I have absolute freedom to dislike them and to express such, without retribution. And I exercise it. And if the opportunity arises to reverse the situation, and improve citizen safety by removing constraints, by altering the intrinsic nature of police forces and their subcultures, by increasing procedural, budgetary, legal and administrative constraints, I will vote in favor.
As I say, the world is plenty full of examples of police forces allowed to run amok. Even modern and civilized states as diverse as Ukraine, India, and Britain have plentiful obvious abuses. A constrained and behaved force is a sign of a healthy nation, perhaps the requirement for such. And the reverse is even more true.
When you come across Aristotle's 'uncorruptable man', then I will agree you can make him an officer and give him all the power in the world. Until then I refuse to recognize officers as anything other than people, humans, with all the pros and cons entailed.
I cannot refuse to comply to certain modern peculiarities of detainment and such, but I have absolute freedom to dislike them and to express such, without retribution. And I exercise it. And if the opportunity arises to reverse the situation, and improve citizen safety by removing constraints, by altering the intrinsic nature of police forces and their subcultures, by increasing procedural, budgetary, legal and administrative constraints, I will vote in favor.
As I say, the world is plenty full of examples of police forces allowed to run amok. Even modern and civilized states as diverse as Ukraine, India, and Britain have plentiful obvious abuses. A constrained and behaved force is a sign of a healthy nation, perhaps the requirement for such. And the reverse is even more true.