I'm trying to understand the practical reasons for someone to choose the Mod. 1894 in 44 Mag or 45 Long Colt over a Mod. 1895 in 45-70.
The 45-70 can be loaded (or bought over the shelf) from light loads at moderate velocity up to very heavy bullets at relatively high velocity capable of busting big dangerous animals....the 45-70 in a lever action can almost reach 4000 ft/lb of muzzle energy.....it has a versatility that the other 2 chamberings cannot even remotely match.
If you do not reload, the price difference for regular commercial ammo between the 45-70 (the typical cheap Remchesteral is already ballistically more capable than a 44 Mag or a 45 Colt) and the other two cartridges is not that significant....and, however, these are not plinking rifles anyway.
If you reload, cost of ammo difference is basically a moot point.
The price of the 2 rifles is basically the same.
The only couple of reasons I can immagine for choosing a Mod. 1894 over a Mod, 1895 is extreme sensitivity to recoil or just the desire to own a rifle chambered for the same cartridge of one of your revolvers (hardly a practical reason nowadays)
Any thoughts or opinions?
The 45-70 can be loaded (or bought over the shelf) from light loads at moderate velocity up to very heavy bullets at relatively high velocity capable of busting big dangerous animals....the 45-70 in a lever action can almost reach 4000 ft/lb of muzzle energy.....it has a versatility that the other 2 chamberings cannot even remotely match.
If you do not reload, the price difference for regular commercial ammo between the 45-70 (the typical cheap Remchesteral is already ballistically more capable than a 44 Mag or a 45 Colt) and the other two cartridges is not that significant....and, however, these are not plinking rifles anyway.
If you reload, cost of ammo difference is basically a moot point.
The price of the 2 rifles is basically the same.
The only couple of reasons I can immagine for choosing a Mod. 1894 over a Mod, 1895 is extreme sensitivity to recoil or just the desire to own a rifle chambered for the same cartridge of one of your revolvers (hardly a practical reason nowadays)
Any thoughts or opinions?
Last edited: