Marlin 60

Status
Not open for further replies.
You might wanna check a pawn shop or armslist for a good used 60

Good advice a couple years back I twice found a Marlin 60 in pawn shops. Both are in VG condition. I paid $60 for one and $75 for the other. Ii also have an older GF 60 that also shoots great for thousands of rounds. I have'nt even cleaned that rifle in 10 yrs.
You can never go wrong with a Marlin 60, but I certainly wouldn't pay $125 more for the SS. I'd just buy the blued version and spend the other $125 for glass or ammo.
 
Frozen,
I got lucky. My trigger & guard are not too bad. I worked on my 60 a bit this evening. I am trying to finish it up. I think it will we a more consistent performer now. I had some problems with the performance and reliability being intermittent. I think I have it figured out. Just need to get to the range to test. Last 2 trips involved other .22lrs. I just wasn't in the mood to have a gun not perform.
In fairness to the 60 it was apart when I got is as a hand me down.
 
I have the stainless. It is nice, but only the barrel, outer mag tube and sights are stainless. The action, receiver and inner mag tube are the same as the other models. I might paint it any way.
 
Every dovetail on the planet is the same way in case you don't know.
Jeff, "slick" was not a comparative between the Model 60's dovetails versus other rifles'. Nevertheless, dovetails are not as location-secure in their design as, for example, Weaver-style mounts which have channels into which ring crossbolts can anchor.

And yes, I meant rings instead of scope in relation to getting an immovable grip on the dovetail.
 
The problem with anchoring a scope on a Model 60 is more "slick mounts" than a "slick dovetail" (dovetail referring to 3/8" receiver grooves introduced by the Weaver tip-off .22 scope mounting system). Weaver's 3/4" and 7/8" diameter scopes came with 3/8" mounts with serrated claws that bit into the mounting grooves. I have had problems anchoring 1" scopes with "tip-off" rings that have slick claws (resorted to loctite or my wife's nail polish on some).
 
2 New 2 Me..

In the last 30 days, I have bought two Marlin 60's. One is in really good in/outside condition, one average with a new BSA scope+camo sling. I paid $120.00 for each of them.
Not a "Barn Burner" of a deal, but I think I'm OK with the prices.
I do also have two semi-custom Ruger 10-22's in my safe. It will be fun to see how the two different brands compared out overall..Bill.:confused::eek:;)
 
I've found one of the problems with anchoring a 1" scope to a 3/8" grooved receiver is the use of steel rings on an aluminum receiver. Although I loath aluminum rings for most purposes, the aluminum variety (in my experience) tend to grip better in this particular application. They're cheaper as well...
 
I went with a Picatinny rail from DIP
http://www.diproductsinc.com/Detail.aspx?PROD=164829&CAT=3603
I have not bought any of there other products.

Prior to that I could not get rings to stay put. I did resort to solving the problem by drilling and tapping 1 ring base. It worked well. I went to a pic rail for other reasons. The DIP pic rail has shown no signs of slipping on the receiver. I got a Weaver brand base and decided it was too flimsy.

The Marlin 60 has 2 problems that vary by individual rifle. 1 is the dovetail. Some slip the rings and some hold tight. 2 is triggers vary from decent to heavy. There are several suggested trigger mods out there.

Another well respected brand is BKL
http://www.bkltech.com/
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top