Marlin Model 60: my first impressions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
3,476
Location
Baltimore
For a while now, I've known that the Marlin Model 60 is a rifle I really wanted to try out. They go for $99 at Academy, and run around $69 for good ones at Southside Pawn.

Then I ran across one for $50 (see my recent post in my Austin Pawnshop thread), so now have what appears to be a mid-1980s Marlin .22

Was very excited about this rifle. It was filthy, but easily cleaned. To deal with the odor, it's currently closed in an empty closet with burning incense sticks (see my Austin Pawnshop post for details on that). The stock was a little clunkier than the current models, but not unbearable. This model was also before Marlin shortened the 60, so it's a full 20" (vice 18"), and holds 17 in the tube vice 14.

Went out to Austin Rifle Club and sighted it in on the Silhouette range. Findings:

ERGOS: pretty dang good, though I'd prefer either the pre-80s or current stocks, which are svelter. Crossbolt safety is well-placed.

MAGAZINE: this is what turns a lot of folks off the 60. I, however, am now completely sold on the idea! Easier to load than box mags, holds 17 rounds OEM, doesn't get in the way of prone position, etc. Big +.

SIGHTS: basic post and notch, but good examples of the type. Pretty fine, but my young eyes pick them up just great. NOTE: the current stainless/synthetic Marlin 60 has odd sights that I don't care for: akward flip-down rear, scrawny front post.

ACCURACY: I'm no competition shooter, but I found the 60 impressively accurate when I did my part.

TRIGGER: The trigger did not look inspiring during disassembly: whole trigger assembly is plastic. Dry-firing in the house, it felt mediocre. But out on the range, it didn't trouble me at all. I believe (please correct if wrong) that older and current Marlins have metal trigger assemblies.

SUMMARY: I would highly recommend the Marlin 60 to anyone looking for a fun plinker. The price, both used and new, is an utter steal for an American-made product. Not as many upgrades available as 10/22, but the 60 is great for those who like stock guns.

I now understand how Marlin managed to sell 7million of these things over the last half-century...

-MV
 
My daughter has one, and my son the carbine-version(75C I believe), and aside from some pickiness about ammo, never a problem.

Both theirs have steel trigger housings, and there are ways to smooth the action up.
 
get some decent rings, and put a reasonably good scope on it you may be SHOCKED to find out how accurate it really is...I have 3-9x Tasco pronghorn on mine($40) and its scary accurate. My best shooting buddy won't bring out his 10/22 any more,and I can usually keep up with him when he shoots his Winchester (52?) target gun, with 24x Leopold scope (total cost about $2500)... A cheap semi-auto .22 has no right to be this accurate...

P.S. for some reason mine likes to be dirty...If I clean the bore it takes 30-40 shots before it gets really accurate...
 
I like tube mags on .22s. They make a lot more sense than a box sticking out the bottom for a hunter. I can rest the gun over a fence post, what ever in the field improvised rest I can find, and there's no mag in the way. That's important to me. I can load my Remington's tube up with 15 rounds and hunt all day without ever worrying about rounds in the mag. I don't quite understand why people knock tube mags. Box mags have to be reloaded, too! It don't take that friggin' long to charge the thing up, either, and it's easy on the thumb. Are people so in a rush that they must buy 15 magazines and pay someone to load them up, take 'em to the range and fire 'em up iin 10 minutes and go home????? I don't understand this, unless, I guess, the range charges by the minute. I belong to a gun club that charges $30 a year dues. I can stay all day and it's no biggy. Rather be at the range than working, that's for sure!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top