From the Annapolis Capital:
Gun editorial
Your editorial headlined "If federal gun ban lapses, state should try one of its own" (The Capital, Dec. 11) said that assault weapons are used in crimes in Maryland. You gave as an example the Bushmaster used in the Washington-area sniper killings.
Although the snipers used a semiautomatic firearm, they fired just one shot at each victim. Any single-shot rifle could have been used in these horrible killings. The snipers did not use the semiautomatic capability of their firearm, and it did not have a selector switch, and so should not be identified as an assault weapon.
You wrote that semiautomatic firearms have no legitimate use for self-defense. Where in the world did you come up with that statement? The very fact that semiautos are capable of rapid fire, with one shot for each squeeze on the trigger, makes them an excellent choice for home-, business- or self-defense.
Semiautomatics do have a legitimate use for hunting. Two other Maryland hunters and I travel to South Dakota almost every year to hunt coyotes. We all often use semiautos - I personally have used a semiauto SKS and an MI carbine. Semiautos are ideal for hunting coyotes in ravines.
Did you forget the May 17, 2001, letter from Attorney General John Ashcroft to James Baker of the National Rifle Association? Mr. Ashcroft wrote: "Let me state unequivocally my view that the text and the original intent of the Second Amendment clearly protect the right of individuals to keep and bear arms."
In your zeal to reduce crime, do not encourage legislators to overlook the fact that the Second Amendment protects the rights of all honest, law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.
Gun editorial
Your editorial headlined "If federal gun ban lapses, state should try one of its own" (The Capital, Dec. 11) said that assault weapons are used in crimes in Maryland. You gave as an example the Bushmaster used in the Washington-area sniper killings.
Although the snipers used a semiautomatic firearm, they fired just one shot at each victim. Any single-shot rifle could have been used in these horrible killings. The snipers did not use the semiautomatic capability of their firearm, and it did not have a selector switch, and so should not be identified as an assault weapon.
You wrote that semiautomatic firearms have no legitimate use for self-defense. Where in the world did you come up with that statement? The very fact that semiautos are capable of rapid fire, with one shot for each squeeze on the trigger, makes them an excellent choice for home-, business- or self-defense.
Semiautomatics do have a legitimate use for hunting. Two other Maryland hunters and I travel to South Dakota almost every year to hunt coyotes. We all often use semiautos - I personally have used a semiauto SKS and an MI carbine. Semiautos are ideal for hunting coyotes in ravines.
Did you forget the May 17, 2001, letter from Attorney General John Ashcroft to James Baker of the National Rifle Association? Mr. Ashcroft wrote: "Let me state unequivocally my view that the text and the original intent of the Second Amendment clearly protect the right of individuals to keep and bear arms."
In your zeal to reduce crime, do not encourage legislators to overlook the fact that the Second Amendment protects the rights of all honest, law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.