This subject comes up regularly, and lots of people like to repeat ugly things about certain flake powders - sometimes I wonder just how much experience they really have?
I use a lot of 700-X, been using it regularly since the 70s - really like it in .38 and .44 Spl, and have decent results with .40 S&W. I have never used anything dillon. For powder measures, I use both an RCBS Du-O-Measure from the 70s, and three different Lee Auto-Disk measures. ALL throw 700-X charges down to 3.0 grains very consistently (all within +/- 0.1g). Below 3.0 grains it can get a bit ify: e.g., the small disc cavity needed for 2.2 grains of 700-X in a Lee Auto-Disk produces totally unacceptable results. Although I have had good results with 2.5g charges, I now consider 3.0g the lower limit for this powder with my powder measures unless I weigh each charge.
All of my powder measures are always mounted directly to the press with the expander die, so they get regular jostling with each stroke of the handle - I am certain this helps the consistency. I also get very good results with 800-X in .357 Magnum level loads. 800-X is a very large flake powder (larger than 700-X and Unique); therefore, it is likely to have a lower limit for measuring consistency considerably higher than 700-X, but I have not yet explored that. I have only recently started working with 800-X, and I like it. For charges between 8-12 grains, my Lee Pro Auto-Disk throws all charges within +/- 0.1 grain (tests done by weighing every thrown charge for several hundred loads).
IMHO, anyone who cannot get decent consistency with 700-X above 3.0 grains either has a problem with their equipment or very poor technique. I do think that ALL powder measures should have a baffle to reduce or eliminate the variability caused by the weight of the powder in the hopper - this is critical to good csistency.