Military Police?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem isn't the gear, it's the attitude. This recent article highlights the problems I cited earlier in this thread. The fellow went to local APD cops and was first told to take a hike, then arrested for suspicion of being on drugs. The charges were dropped, but they still made him pay hundreds in impound charges on the van. That's exactly why the local cops ain't my buddies and why they won't be in the near future. They're far from the worst police force out there, and most aren't overtly corrupt. But they view all of us as potential marks. Very much as the criminals do, interestingly enough.

http://208.109.242.142/site/basicarticle.asp?ID=79

Early on the morning of March 17, Ferguson discovered that someone had broken into his Ford Aerostar van, which was parked behind the Pioneer, a downtown Anchorage bar. A rock a little smaller than a bowling ball was sitting in shattered glass on the van’s passenger seat, he said, and his violin was missing. At about 2:30 a.m., he tried to report the theft to two police officers on Fourth Avenue, he said, but they told him to report the theft later in the morning.
...
But that’s not what Breiner and Hoffman were interested in. They had Ferguson perform several field sobriety tests.

Ferguson failed a test that analyzes side-to-side eye motion and had trouble with standing on one leg and following walking directions, police said. Ferguson’s explaination was that he has crooked legs and a bad hip, which he told the police. They arrested him, charged him with DUI and called a tow truck to impound his van.
 
Hi Cosmoline,

You bring up a good point. This is where it is important to know your laws. I would much prefer a breath test vs the various made up "field sobriety tests". Those are purely subjective, rather than an arbitrary machine that measure your blood alcohol level within .001 (or whatever it is).

If two officers were to try such shenanigans I would first ask them if they can pass that test. By their very nature those tests were designed to make one fail. If they want to cart me into the local po-po I will accommodate them. And boy will their boss be getting an earful. Now THAT is the kind of stuff you have MUST stand up to if you want to stop that kind of mentality from occurring within your community. It is lawlessness. Nothing enforces the seriousness of a situation within the law enforcement community like the public outcry of improper police operations. I know several friends in my community who will fight all their traffic tickets. So far I have not known a single one of them to have had a ticket stick. Which is saying something, because I think a few of them drive like maniacs.

If more citizens would simply band together, then stand up for what is right this mentality would stop pretty quick. The battle of Athens immediately comes to mind. Those citizens first took all the proper procedures to deal with the corruption within their community, it didn't get fixed. So they eventually made a stand for their rights and broke into the local armory, armed themselves with military equipment and explosives, and forced a fair election. Even with the fight that ensued there were no casualties, just some hurt pride and an sheepish ex-sheriff. And yes, I do believe that was an extreme example. But it only became extreme because the problem wasn't dealt with earlier, before it grew up into a serious problem.
 
No need to "get around" Posse Commitatus.

Someone still thinks it's a limit on the military? It ain't, it's alimit on civilians that try to force military cooperation in law enforcement.

Anywho if they want to roll around in a 113, more power to them, hope they are wearing NOMEX.

Sam
 
Sam, that's a sign that we are living in a "soft dictatorship" and it's not good...

There is little need for military equipment in the hands of the police (who were supposed to be PEACE OFFICERS, though many will see this as semantics). Certainly, there is far less "need" of police officers with military equipment than there is a "need" for military rifles in the hands of civilians.

For the record, I have no issues with peaceful citizens possessing military carbines and battle rifles. I'm not trying to oppress anyone or any group so I'm not threatened by you or everyone possessing one or more. That said, weaponry will not obtain liberty in our Republic; only aware, motivated, Godly-intented action from the public (read: YOU & I) can do this. The weaponry is a "toy" when times are good and a tool if and when required.

Later.
 
Using your logic...

The founders weren't dealing with laser guided bombs, fighter jets, satellites, helicopter gunships, tanks, cluster bombs, Level 4 body armor, or any other advantage they may have over us.

Am I then to expect nuclear weapons?

"If all the wrong thinkers are sheep, who will they send to take me and will he bring some mint jelly?"
 
I don't see a problem with it as long as they use these free vehicles, from the military for different roles, such as rescue, SWAT and etc.

Or shooting unarmed optometrists that are accused of being bookies in the chest or maybe 92 year old grandmothers to death. All just isolated cases right?
 
"Quote:
I don't see a problem with it as long as they use these free vehicles, from the military for different roles, such as rescue, SWAT and etc.

Or shooting unarmed optometrists that are accused of being bookies in the chest or maybe 92 year old grandmothers to death. All just isolated cases right?"

hate to interject reallity but didn't that cop get outa an suv? have you declared them military?
 
well, hee's my $.02

Well, here's my response to some of the "wisdom" I've seen displayed. . .

That makes two of us. I'm also a CJ major, and the vast majority of my peers disgust me. They buy into the police subculture that anyone that isnt a cop is "the enemy."

as a Criminal Justice major, i encounter more potential officers who view it as "us vs 'The scum" and ofcouse any one in the system is guilty, or they wouldnt be in the system.

Stress on the word potential. As in not yet. As in not even an FNG. There are many people who wanna be the police, not as many who can be. Ben a cop for a while, got some college under my belt too (working ever so slowly on my AA). CJ majors are quite possibly worse than the Liberal Arts majors for Bullsh*t. . . IMHO. Nothing personal, just my observation.

My advice for anyone wanting to get into Law Enforcement is to try working at a local county jail for a year or so. Best experience and training you can get in preparation for law enforcement. Best of all you get to learn your frequent fliers. After a few years there, you'll either get fed up and get out, or develope the set of skills you'll need to be an effective LEO; the intuition, the ability to read people, and "common sense" judgement skills.

Until law enforcement requires at least a BA or BS, it will never be professional. Texas requires only 12 hours of college credit to be TCLEOSE certified

SWAT and elite police units should not exist in a truly free republic, the fact that they exist indicates our freedoms are in grave peril.

What, pray tell, will requiring a 4 yr degree gain law enforcement as a field? There are departments that require this Gaston County here in NC for one. They also are continually short on personel. Seems that college grads have better thins to do then earn $30k a year and the scorn of the population. Most departements DO offer incentive pay for higher education. A great motivator for officers to grind out their college.

Prove to me that Art Appreciation and American Lit make a better officer. I for one have not seen it. Not that they make worse officers. . just not any better. It does make for better written reports.

Power inevitably tends to corrupt.

By that standard I ought to be peddeling child porn and smoking eightballs while kicking nuns to death by now. . get real.

It's proven that cops are no better or worse then the general popuation in terms of breaking the law. When you consider that most of the population gets through life without comitting a felony or even a serious misdemeanor.. well, I guess most cops can do the same.

Some of the things that are written on this board appear to be no more than a mirror image of the liberal paranoia propaganda.

Same logic really. "I can't trust myself with the power (legal powers in law enforcement/right to bear arms as a free citizen), so I can't trust anyone else with that power"

Mayberry was fiction, in that it NEVER really existed. Mayberry never had murders, never had parents beating or raping their children. Mayberry had Otis, who was always drunk, but always harmless, but didn't seem to have the drunk who drove through a Stop sign and killed a couple driving home from a date. Mayberry didn't have clandestine meth labs, or a wide variety of gangs who will use violence, including murder for criminal profit. AGAIN, Mayberry was fiction and never existed. Real places, including small towns, have always had lots of evil things going on, although many people were, and some still are, in denial about that.

If you start by whining that modern cops aren't like Andy and Barney in Mayberry, you've already proven your argument is not based in reality. You're asking for the real world to operate like a TV show!

Exactly.

I would much prefer a breath test vs the various made up "field sobriety tests".

Field sobriety tests are standardized. They establish probable cause. Once you have probable case, you haul said drunk in for a breath test. A portable breath test can also establish said PC.

And that people is the REAL problem with LEO's today - obedience without question to their masters in the government. They stopped serving the citizenry about 40 years ago.

Cops are agents of the government not the people.

That is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard. The role of police is to enforce the LAW. LAW is enacted by the GOVERNMENT which is elected by the CITIZENS. So yes, LEO's serve the government, always have, always will.

If the police have to bust up a Meth. Lab. run by some Latin gang or the Hell's Angels, I think they should have the tools they need to go in heavy and live to go home to their wives and kids.

Yes. How I wish some of you CCW badge wearing, tacti-cool mall ninjas would get off your stinking rears and GO through a law enforcement training program and GET on the street. Hell, ride along for a few weeks. Then you could see the reality that people like myself and other LEOs have to deal with every day. It's called the real world.

In closing, a quote from someone who said it better:
It's not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or when the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worth cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement; and who at the worst if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat. -Theodore Roosevelt
 
Part of the cause of the militarization of the police starts before the police officers even become officers - while they're in school 'training' to become a LEO.

Having taken several Criminal Justice courses at a school where the majority of the students were CJ majors, it is apparent to me that the curriculum is fashioned to foster this mentality. As near as I can tell, most of the curriculum, particularly the introductory curriculum, is based on guidelines and research provided and largely dictated by The Establishment; that is, the government (FBI, etc.), government contractors, and 'private' think tanks. In my own limited experience, much of this information is contradictory to what I witness on a daily basis in the news, and it is largely "policy" regurgitated (such as in my 'intro to homeland security' class, where 'domestic Joe Sixpack white trash militia member' was just as evil and deadily, evil, and common as Jihadi Joe). This course was required for the criminal justice degree at this school (iirc, at the recommendation of the DOJ, though it may have even been a requirement by the DOE or whatever.)

In short, the cops are indoctrinated to see "us" as the enemy before they even interview for the position. It doesn't help that cops these days are only selected from a pool of people with military experience and/or a degree in criminal justice: they've got first-hand experience with terrorists, and they've also received the state-required education on what, exactly, a "terrorist" is. No more can your average LEO be "just another guy" who understands the law and what constitutes basic human decency: he really does have to be a "special force".

It's getting pretty bad.
 
Field sobriety tests are standardized. They establish probable cause.

Field sobriety tests are standardized, but are they an effective measurement of impairment. I just saw an article about an expirement conducted on the effectiveness of field sobriety tests. A professor had a random group of students perform FST for several visiting police officers. None of the students had consumed any alcholol or drugs. The police said that based on the tests, they would have arrested as many as half the students for being under the influence.

I'll see if I can dig up the link. I just saw this within the last few days.
 
Can any LEO justify the personal carrier on Post #1 of this thread for me??
Justify the need......

The North Hollywood bank shoot out? Barricaded gunman? "Sniper" on a clocktower? I can see where it could be possible that you might need an apc to extract personel or make an approach. Use a little imagination. As a matter of fact don't see any weapons mounted on that apc, so it pretty much looks like a nice piece of mobile cover. Perfect for going home alive at the end of the day.

I'm not a big fan of seeing other officers in BDU's, with the exception of K9 officers. Dogs get messy and polyester doesn't do well around dogs. I am in favor of comfortable work uniforms however. Alot of agencies are transitioning over to more "practical" uniforms from "traditional" ones. Here's another factiod. Alot guys here in the county are changing from Sam Brown belts to Tac vests when gven the option. Kow why? It's not the militarization of our department. It's not train up for storming hoses int he middle the night for mass gun cofiscation . It's the fact that wearing 15 lbs of gear on your hips for 12 hrs while sitting in a car will ruin you back. Gee, whe I'm 55 and retiring, it might be nice to be able to pick up the grand kids. .

I'm sure Cosmolene won't talk to me though beause I look like a prick for wanting to keep my spine together. . . kidding, I'm kidding! :neener:

Gene Ferguson takes on Anchorage Police over a DUI charge

Seriously Cosmo, unless you really know this guy's criminal history, past interactions with the officers, circumstances surrounding the arrest, wouldn't qoute an article like this as example.. . the paper is FREE. Very likely this is a fresh out of college journalist trying to make a name to get a better job I use newspaper like this to line the bottom of the cat box in case the cats clawthrough the plastic liner . . .
The Anchorage Press is an Anchorage-wide Art, Entertainment, Recreation and Metro newspaper. Established in 1992, The Press is printed WEEKLY on Thursdays and distributed to its readers at 400+ convenient locations throughout the Anchorage area. The paper is FREE. Convenient mail subscriptions are available within Alaska for $30 per year. Out-of-state subscriptions are $70 per year.

.


In my own limited experience, much of this information is contradictory to what I witness on a daily basis in the news, and it is largely "policy" regurgitated (such as in my 'intro to homeland security' class, where 'domestic Joe Sixpack white trash militia member' was just as evil and deadily, evil, and common as Jihadi Joe).

Exactly, what you see in the news is not realty. It's the news media's job to SELL news, not inform you of what rally happened. They have to sell commercials.

Also, sorry to burst your bubble but until 9/11 our deadliest terrorist attacks were home grown. Anyone remember Eric Rudolph (killed three people and injured at least 150 others or Timothy McVeigh (168 people dead and 850 injured)?

Field sobriety tests are standardized, but are they an effective measurement of impairment

They don't have to be 100% accurate, just good enough. They are an investgative tool. The Intoxilyzer is results are what matter. Also where is this artcle, what was the prof's methidology? How good were the officers with administering FST's? Did they take the SFST course?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nystagmus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_Sobriety_Test#Field_sobriety_test


An officer does not need to prove an offense happened "beyond a reasonable doubt" he needs probable cause. Courts are for "beyond a reasonable doubt".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause

Anyone else?
 
They don't have to be 100% accurate, just good enough.

Exactly. By performing these FST's, one is just handing the police more evidence to be used against oneself. In my opinion, FST's are exactly like polygraph tests -- passing them won't help you, but failing them will put you in a world of hurt. In other words, I can still be arrested for DUI even after passing all of the FST's, so why would I bother to potentially give the police more evidence by complying with these tests?

To all the police on THR: are these field sobriety tests compulsory or voluntary? I also understand that since a person could lose their license automatically for one year by refusing the breathalyzer, I would consider that test to be compulsory. If I am pulled over in whichever jurisdiction you work in for suspected DUI and I refuse the FST's, can I be punished for the refusal?
 
are these field sobriety tests compulsory or voluntary?

When you get a drivers licence and operate a motor vehicle on the highway, you give implied consent to chemical testing for impairing substances. This is law in every state in the US as far as I know. To take it one step further, when you get your USAEUR drivers licence when serving in Europe in the military you give express consent by your signing the driver's licence stating that you will submit to chemial testing if suspected of DUI. The consent text is printed on the back.

http://www.answers.com/topic/implied-consent

I
n other words, I can still be arrested for DUI even after passing all of the FST's,

No, because if you pass the FST, there ain't enough probable cause for an arrest. Unless of course I put you on a PBT (portable breath tester), then I don't need a FST, I have enough PC to arrest you and take you for chemical testing.

If I am pulled over in whichever jurisdiction you work in for suspected DUI and I refuse the FST's, can I be punished for the refusal?

Honestly, I'd hit you with a "resist, obstruct, delay a public officer" charge for interfering with my investigation (and making my life difficult). If you were really obnoxious, I'd take you in to the Intoxylizer and when you refused to blow I'd hit you with the 30 day civil revocation. That's here in North Carolina at least. I don't presume to know the intricacies of law in other states.

Play nice and cops play nice. Be and ass and we are asses.
 
Play nice and cops play nice. Be and ass and we are asses.

Which translated means roll over and we may or may not keep up the fishing expedition, assert your rights and you are sure to be arrested for something. Even if you are found not guilty, you have still had your life ruined.


I was a correctional officer in Howard County MD for six years. The attitude of the inmates I was charged with safekeeping had absolutely no bearings on my actions or responsibilities.
 
I was a correctional officer in Howard County MD for six years. The attitude of the inmates I was charged with safekeeping had absolutely no bearings on my actions or responsibilities.

Having worked confinement and the road, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that enforcement and confinement are two differant animals. In corrections noone in the public is going to film you and put it on the evening news, noone is going to second guess you in court and your boss is not running for reelection.

Which translated means roll over and we may or may not keep up the fishing expedition, assert your rights and you are sure to be arrested for something. Even if you are found not guilty, you have still had your life ruined

No, it means give me respect, I give you respect. Fact is is that most cops let people go as lightly as they allow us to. Face it, cops are in the job of controlling people's behavior. Most people don't like to be told they are wrong or what to do. It's not a matter of "lick my boots, I'm in charge" it's a matter of maintaining control of the situation.


What is your position on No-Knock search warrants?

If "knocking" means there's even a slim chance of injury or death for an officer then to heck with that. If it can be done the "right way" great, but lets not put peoples lives on the line for the sake of form. If the warrant is legitimate then it really desn't matter in the end.

By god, if anyone here wants to volunteer to be point man on the next meth lab we raid and knock and announce, please let me know.

Search warrants are one of the fewest things my dept does. I think we serve more tax executions then warrants. A good number of the warrants are incident to an arrest.
 
If "knocking" means there's even a slim chance of injury or death for an officer then to heck with that. If it can be done the "right way" great, but lets not put peoples lives on the line for the sake of form. If the warrant is legitimate then it really desn't matter in the end.

By god, if anyone here wants to volunteer to be point man on the next meth lab we raid and knock and announce, please let me know.

Search warrants are one of the fewest things my dept does. I think we serve more tax executions then warrants. A good number of the warrants are incident to an arrest.


I can understand that position, however we are seeing a disturbing frequency of LEO's using no-knock warrants either improperly -- or failing to go to the correct house. This has resulted in death and/or sever property damage to innocent people. The problem is that this isn't a theory. Isolated mistakes are becoming less "isolated." And it isn't the LEO who is lying in a pool of his own blood on the floor for that mistake.

-- John
 
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that enforcement and confinement are two differant animals.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that if you let someones attitude toward you as a police officer affect how you treated them then you lack professionalism.

I'm not saying that you have to kiss someones ass, but either they did something wrong or they didn't. If they didn't, then you have no right to go around looking for broken taillights or roaches in the ashtray etc. You have alraedy implied you would or have, that's why I don't like most cops.


YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAY:fire:
 
Hey, I'm back...

Paco, when you tell us how much time you have contacting the public as a police officer, your opinion will have some weight.

If you have no time logged--or are not an officer--sorry, but I will say that you are commenting from an uninformed view, at best.

If ANYONE can stand up and tell me that being cursed at, yelled at, assaulted, or possibly shot--and living with that possibility--does NOT affect your attitude, then you're not a human being.

Don't even bother trying to get on a high horse, and telling the board how you'll act if you have no experience.

Here's a scenario...

You do a traffic stop--person was going 20 over.

You call in the plate, and get out to approach the vehicle. You approach the driver--as you get closer, you hear the driver saying to the passenger, "I'm going to kick this punk's a**. The car door starts to open up.

How would you handle it? Moreover, HOW'S YOUR ATTITUDE?

I'm not saying that you have to kiss someones ass, but either they did something wrong or they didn't. If they didn't, then you have no right to go around looking for broken taillights or roaches in the ashtray etc. You have alraedy implied you would or have, that's why I don't like most cops.

You don't have to like it. If you don't want to interact with police officers, don't break the law. Don't come stumbling out of bars at 2 AM with your car keys in your hand. Don't hang around known drug areas or areas of prostitution. Don't give an officer any reason to contact you, and you won't contact one.

Oh, and by the way--don't call for help either, when you hear the bump in the night. When some car of drunken idiots follows you because they perceive that you "dissed" them, make darned sure that you erase 911 from your cell phone. And, if you're out some night with your significant other, if you happen to run afoul of people and there are about three or four that REALLY don't like you much, hey--since you hate cops, don't call us. Trust me, we can do without the paperwork.

The bottom line is this:

Good attitude earns good treatment.
Respect given equals respect returned.
Be open and honest with me, and I'll be open and honest with you.

Simple and to the point.

Quod erat demonstratum.
 
I'm not saying that you have to kiss someones ass, but either they did something wrong or they didn't. If they didn't, then you have no right to go around looking for broken taillights or roaches in the ashtray etc. You have alraedy implied you would or have, that's why I don't like most cops.

If they didn't do anything wrong, then I have no reason to stop them and would not interact with them. I can see you have no experience with enforcement because you assume that police stop people for no reason. I have to have a reason to stop and seize you. I have to at least have reasonable suspicion.

If I have a legitimate stop then I do need to look into things because routine stops are one of the the best ways to get "bigger" cases. . . Your trafficing, your wanted persons, your stolen goods. . . see the picture here?

If I arrest the guy who's breaking into houses because I looked around on a routine stop then I have done the community a service because this guy will be locked up and can't keep breaking into houses. All it takes is a little looking around.

A good additude means that I might give you a citation for that misdemeanor (court summons) as opposed to taking you to jail and letting you pay a bondsman or have you family drag cash down to the jail at 2am.
 
If you have no time logged--or are not an officer--sorry, but I will say that you are commenting from an uninformed view, at best.

Neither am I a veterinarian, but I do know a horses ass when I see it.
 
oooh oooh, ad hominim!

now I'm waiting for the lockage of the threadage. . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top