Minutemen Gaining in Immigration Debate

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
The way I read this, the Minutmen are gaining ground and acceptence, dispite the fact some of them carry guns. Personally, I think they all should be armed with full auto assault rifles.;)

Minutemen Gaining in Immigration Debate
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/04/26/D8H7RCGGR.html

By GILLIAN FLACCUS
Associated Press Writer


IRVINE, Calif.


Laurie Lisonbee worried about illegal immigration but figured it was somebody else's issue _ until she saw hundreds of thousands of immigrants and their supporters marching across her TV screen.

Soon, Lisonbee had recruited several friends to attend a demonstration by the Minuteman Project, a volunteer group that patrols the border to keep out illegal immigrants. Now, the 51-year-old art professor checks the group's Web site daily and plans a summer trip to the Mexican border to help build a fence.



Minuteman organizers say this spring's marches have proved to be an unexpected recruitment tool for Americans who feel uneasy about the burgeoning immigration movement but may have considered the organization a pack of gun-toting vigilantes.

"We're not trying to be more mainstream _ mainstream has found us," said Stephen Eichler, the group's executive director. "They're saying, 'These guys actually have teeth, they don't all chew tobacco, they don't all have a gun rack in the back of their truck.' They're saying, `They believe what I believe,' and they're joining us."

Lisonbee, a registered Republican, said only one issue matters to her now.

"My vote will go to the candidate who's the toughest on immigration, whether they're Democrat or Republican," she said from her home in Orem, Utah. "Before, we were pretty much the types of people who would call our congressmen and not take to the streets. But that's all changed now."

The Minuteman Project first gained attention last year when Orange County resident and former tax accountant Jim Gilchrist helped lead its first 30-day patrol of the border in Arizona. The group has added mainstream political tools, including a network of local chapters and e-mail lobbying campaigns.

In December, Gilchrist, a former Republican, ran as a third-party candidate in a special House election in Orange County, Calif., finished a respectable third with 25 percent of the vote.

Since this spring's huge pro-immigrant rallies, 300 people nationwide have applied to start local chapters, according to Eichler. The group's goal is 500 chapters by December and a membership of 1 million within 1 1/2 years, Eichler said.

Eichler claimed the organization's membership has climbed to more than 200,000.

But Heidi Beirich, deputy director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project, which monitors the Minuteman Project for racist rhetoric, said that estimate appears to be ridiculously high. She offered no estimate of her own.

"At the border during this last outing, they had maybe 50 people. If they have 200,000 people, it doesn't seem right," she said.

Beirich also questioned the premise that pro-immigrant rallies will help the Minuteman Project. She said many recruits may attend one or two rallies, but leave after they discover what she called the group's extremist attitudes.

"They get in there and they're like, `My God, I didn't sign on for this,'" she said.

In the coming weeks, the Minuteman Project plans to set out in a caravan from Los Angeles to Washington, with stops in 13 cities, including President Bush's vacation haven of Crawford, Texas. It is also raising money to build a private fence along parts of the California-Mexico border.

Increased security along the border is a popular idea on Capitol Hill, where the immigration debate will soon resume. How to treat the approximately 11 million illegal immigrants now here is where Congress splits _ a House bill would criminalize the immigrants, a Senate bill would offer guest worker status and a potential path to citizenship.

David S. Meyer, a professor of sociology and political science at the University of California, Irvine, said the growing Minuteman movement has "stiffened the spine" of conservative politicians who might otherwise be wary of publicly identifying with the organization's views.

He said the recent workplace crackdown at a pallet manufacturer that resulted in 1,100 arrests at 40 U.S. sites was part of an attempt by the Bush administration to appease the Minuteman Project and its congressional supporters. Bush supports a guest worker program.

"The debate has kind of come to them, and they're clever enough politically to realize that," Meyer said. "People in mainstream politics who are not associated with the Minuteman Project are essentially voicing their position, which is a victory itself."
 
Laurie Lisonbee worried about illegal immigration but figured it was somebody else's issue _ until she saw hundreds of thousands of immigrants and their supporters marching across her TV screen.

This right here was probably the single dumbest thing that the illegal immigration advocates could possibly have done. A lot of people in this nation dont consider this to be a problem, but after seeing these displays a lot of people are changing their minds. There is little that Americans hate more than someone waving the flag of a foreign nation on our soil. Being an American means being a part of this nation, NOT being a Mexican living in America.

A lot of people *like* immigrants, myself included. They make the nation stronger. But people like this are not immigrants, they are foreigners who wish to have no stake in this nation but desire control over her policies. That right there is where the line gets drawn for me.
 
Now I know that their are a few members of the Minutemen on THR, so please tell us, what are:
the group's extremist attitudes

Has there been talk of shooting Mexicans, or creating a "pure white nation"?

I am not a member (although I do support their cause) so I don't know.:rolleyes:
 
But people like this are not immigrants, they are foreigners who wish to have no stake in this nation but desire control over her policies
Thank you I needed a consise point to counter my liberal nieces arguments on the subject.

She's not really that hard to beat, especially since she called me a racist that wanted to close the borders to any non white immigrants.
My Viet immigrant FOB wife was sitting next to me at the time:D
 
Notice the Work...

...of the leftist reporter here.

But Heidi Beirich, deputy director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project, which monitors the Minuteman Project for racist rhetoric, said that estimate appears to be ridiculously high. She offered no estimate of her own.

It used to be subtle to use some self-proclaimed public figure to attempt to reinforce leftist propaganda. The use of the sentence structure "But so-and-so, a such-and-such from such-and-such..." is its dead giveaway. Warning: when you see this type of reporting, it is being used intentionally to influence your stance on an issue. In this instance, it is used first to suggest that what some communist at a communist organization thinks matters, and secondly to tell you that she thinks they're a small fringe group--after all, people who want to stand against a full-scale invasion can't be getting POPULAR now, can they? Heaven forbid.

Fortunately, these days such a thing has been seen and exposed so many times that it isn't so easy to slip past an unsuspecting reader, eh?
 
c_yeager said:
A lot of people *like* immigrants, myself included. They make the nation stronger. But people like this are not immigrants, they are foreigners who wish to have no stake in this nation but desire control over her policies. That right there is where the line gets drawn for me.

Same here. My father was an immigrant, but when he came here through Ellis Island, he and his parents learned english, worked hard, paid taxes, and were proud to call themselves American.

Immigrants who want to become Americans are welcome, Mexican nationals who want to move here and make us accomodate THEIR language and THEIR customs are not welcome.

My grandparents and father didn't come here expecting people to speak Italian and they didn't expect hand-outs. They expected to have the same chance as everybody else to find work and raise a family.
 
There's a vast world of difference between immigrants, who have always been one of America's greatest strengths, and illegal aliens, who are parasites.

The leftist extremists always do their best to muddy the distinction between good and evil.
 
When a news article or editorial, (Like there's usually a difference.:rolleyes: ) makes reference to some group's "extremist attitudes" without citing any, it's generally safe to assume that there aren't any to cite, and it's just a throwaway line.

Or that the author fears the public doesn't agree with her about what constitutes an "extremist attitude".

Either way, it's an indication that the piece is a hit job, not serious journalism.
 
When a news article or editorial, (Like there's usually a difference. ) makes reference to some group's "extremist attitudes" without citing any, it's generally safe to assume that there aren't any to cite, and it's just a throwaway line.
If anybody in the MM had ever make a racist comment at a meeting or gathering, you can be assured it would be front page news for weeks.
 
hank you I needed a consise point to counter my liberal nieces arguments on the subject.

She's not really that hard to beat, especially since she called me a racist that wanted to close the borders to any non white immigrants.
My Viet immigrant FOB wife was sitting next to me at the time

The people who injected race into this issue are the American Left. Ted Kennedy has been the spear-carrier for those who, for reasons best known to himself, have expressly wanted to de-europeanize America for the last four decades. A look at the immigration rolls--I mean legal immigration--will show that in fact non-whites have been deliberately favored by a large margin.

That said, this is NOT about race or about legal immigration, and of course the Left knows this. This is about only one thing: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. And with that all that is implied by breaking our laws and our sovereignty.
 
Any article that interviews the Southern Poverty Law Center is in my book nothing worth looking at.

That's ol Morris Dees and Co

\\
 
The Southern Poverty Law Center is the best source against the MM that can be found. No other groups are looking at them as terrorist or hate groups, because they simply aren't.

The SPLC can't be trusted. These yahoos said the NRA is a "right wing terrorist organization"

HAhahahahaha.

If they ever got on the Jews for the Preservation of Firearms website, or better yet, met Aaron Zelman, they'd all just stroke out.
 
and, meanwhile, back at Central Command...SCOTUS!

http://www.latimes.com/services/site/premium/access-registered.intercept
From the Los Angeles Times
Justices Debate Illegal Hiring Case
The crux is whether a federal racketeering law can apply to firms using undocumented workers.
By Nicole Gaouette
Times Staff Writer

April 27, 2006

WASHINGTON — In a case that could provide a new way to crack down on firms that hire undocumented immigrants, the Supreme Court on Wednesday considered whether companies could be charged with racketeering if they used contractors to hire undocumented employees.

The case was brought by employees of Mohawk Industries Inc., a Georgia carpet maker, who say the company depressed their wages by hiring undocumented immigrants.

The justices focused on narrow questions: Whether a firm and an outside contractor fit the definition of an "enterprise" under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute, or RICO, and whether corporations could be sued at all under a law originally meant to chase down the mob.

But with a handful of similar cases already in the courts, a decision for the Mohawk employees could generate numerous civil suits against businesses reliant on immigrants. The decision could also affect the use of RICO in criminal cases. The Justice Department, which had a lawyer in court to support the employees' argument, uses the law to send corrupt union leaders to prison and win financial damages from pension funds.

Some business groups say they are worried by the prospect of new RICO cases. "We don't think it's a proper use of the RICO statutes, frankly," said Laura Foote Reiff of the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, a business alliance.

"Unless we get an immigration reform bill, we're going to see more and more RICO cases, and that's a huge problem for business and a misuse of the RICO statutes," Reiff said.

Congress is considering an overhaul of immigration laws that could include measures to allow more foreign workers to take jobs legally in the U.S.

Michael Hethmon, an attorney with the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which favors restrictions on all forms of immigration, said the case showed the federal government was unable to enforce immigration law.

"What we're seeing is a devolution of enforcement onto state and local officials and the citizens themselves through private actions," said Hethmon, who favors the use of the RICO law in immigration cases. "Congress intended this [RICO statute] to be a powerful tool. The needs for these kinds of tools are critical and the problems that are triggering this will only get worse."

The RICO statute was written in 1970 to prosecute the Mafia. In 1996, Congress expanded it to include immigration law violations and specifically included the hiring of undocumented workers. As a legal tool, it has the attraction of allowing plaintiffs to claim triple damages.

RICO laws can only be applied if an enterprise separate from the defendant exists. Currently, these enterprises are described mostly as groupings of individuals. On Wednesday, the justices considered whether a corporation and an outside contractor recruiting illegal immigrants qualified as an enterprise under the law.

A few of the justices indicated an unwillingness to interpret the RICO statutes in ways that could expand their use.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer asked if Congress meant for the 1996 expansion to "RICO-ize with criminal penalties … vast amounts of ordinary commercial activity." Justice Antonin Scalia said he did not want a decision that would let lower courts probe the way corporations conduct their daily business.

But Justice David H. Souter questioned Mohawk's lawyer about whether "a scheme to provide phony IDs" for workers brought by a contractor fit the RICO definition of an enterprise.

The defense counsel, Carter G. Phillips, argued that an alleged practice of issuing false IDs was "simply Mohawk conducting its own affairs." He argued that it could not be guilty of a RICO violation because it was conducting its regular business.

Justice Department attorney Malcolm L. Stewart countered that businesses being used as a front for drug dealing could argue that they should not be sued under RICO, as they too were simply conducting their normal business. Stewart also told the justices that appeals courts had ruled unanimously in favor of a plaintiff's use of RICO in immigration-related cases.

The Mohawk case is currently on hold while the company appeals a trial court judge's refusal to dismiss the case.

Other RICO cases in the works include a lawsuit against Tyson Foods Inc., brought by the same Chicago-based lawyer, Howard Foster, representing the Mohawk employees. That case will be heard in 2007.

Foster also represents Canyon County, Idaho, in a RICO suit against local employers that is now under appeal.

The case before the Supreme Court is Mohawk Industries Inc. vs. Shirley Williams, et al. A decision is expected by the end of June.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top