Montana Firearm's Freedom Act

Status
Not open for further replies.

ManBearPig

member
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
151
If this passes and if by the small small and very small chance the Brady's get the things they want, I'm moving to Montana. They are going to pass a bill that says their state residents are exempt from Federal Gun Regulations under the commerce clause of the Constitution. That's freaking sweet!!! Every pro-gun state should do this to put up a shield against the antis.

http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm#About


2009 Montana Legislature

Additional Bill Links PDF (with line numbers)

HOUSE BILL NO. 246

INTRODUCED BY J. BONIEK



A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT EXEMPTING FROM FEDERAL REGULATION UNDER THE COMMERCE CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES A FIREARM, A FIREARM ACCESSORY, OR AMMUNITION MANUFACTURED AND RETAINED IN MONTANA; PROVIDING FOR THE DUTIES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; AND PROVIDING AN APPLICABILITY DATE."



BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:



NEW SECTION. Section 1. Short title. [Sections 1 through 7] may be cited as the "Montana Firearms Freedom Act".



NEW SECTION. Section 2. Legislative declarations of authority. The legislature declares that the authority for [sections 1 through 7] is the following:

(1) The 10th amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the states and their people all powers not granted to the federal government elsewhere in the constitution and reserves to the state and people of Montana certain powers as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those powers is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(2) The ninth amendment to the United States constitution guarantees to the people rights not granted in the constitution and reserves to the people of Montana certain rights as they were understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889. The guaranty of those rights is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(3) The regulation of intrastate commerce is vested in the states under the 9th and 10th amendments to the United States constitution, particularly if not expressly preempted by federal law. Congress has not expressly preempted state regulation of intrastate commerce pertaining to the manufacture on an intrastate basis of firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition.

(4) The second amendment to the United States constitution reserves to the people the right to keep and bear arms as that right was understood at the time that Montana was admitted to statehood in 1889, and the guaranty of the right is a matter of contract between the state and people of Montana and the United States as of the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.

(5) Article II, section 12, of the Montana constitution clearly secures to Montana citizens, and prohibits government interference with, the right of individual Montana citizens to keep and bear arms. This constitutional protection is unchanged from the 1889 Montana constitution, which was approved by congress and the people of Montana, and the right exists as it was understood at the time that the compact with the United States was agreed upon and adopted by Montana and the United States in 1889.



NEW SECTION. Section 3. Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 7], the following definitions apply:

(1) "Borders of Montana" means the boundaries of Montana described in Article I, section 1, of the 1889 Montana constitution.

(2) "Firearms accessories" means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, folding or aftermarket stocks and grips, speedloaders, ammunition carriers, and lights for target illumination.

(3) "Generic and insignificant parts" includes but is not limited to springs, screws, nuts, and pins.

(4) "Manufactured" means that a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition has been created from basic materials for functional usefulness, including but not limited to forging, casting, machining, or other processes for working materials.



NEW SECTION. Section 4. Prohibitions. A personal firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately in Montana and that remains within the borders of Montana is not subject to federal law or federal regulation, including registration, under the authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce. It is declared by the legislature that those items have not traveled in interstate commerce. This section applies to a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured in Montana from basic materials and that can be manufactured without the inclusion of any significant parts imported from another state. Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials. Firearms accessories that are imported into Montana from another state and that are subject to federal regulation as being in interstate commerce do not subject a firearm to federal regulation under interstate commerce because they are attached to or used in conjunction with a firearm in Montana.



NEW SECTION. Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:

(1) a firearm that cannot be carried and used by one person;

(2) a firearm that has a bore diameter greater than 1 1/2 inches and that uses smokeless powder, not black powder, as a propellant;

(3) ammunition with a projectile that explodes using an explosion of chemical energy after the projectile leaves the firearm; or

(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.



NEW SECTION. Section 6. Marketing of firearms. A firearm manufactured or sold in Montana under [sections 1 through 7] must have the words "Made in Montana" clearly stamped on a central metallic part, such as the receiver or frame.



NEW SECTION. Section 7. Duties of the attorney general. (1) A Montana citizen whom the government of the United States attempts to prosecute, under the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce, for violation of a federal law concerning the manufacture, sale, transfer, or possession of a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured and retained within Montana must be defended in full by the Montana attorney general.

(2) Upon written notification to the Montana attorney general by a Montana citizen of intent to manufacture a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition to which [sections 1 through 7] apply, the attorney general shall seek a declaratory judgment from the federal district court for the district of Montana that [sections 1 through 7] are consistent with the United States constitution.



NEW SECTION. Section 8. Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 7] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 30, and the provisions of Title 30 apply to [sections 1 through 7].



NEW SECTION. Section 9. Applicability. [This act] applies to firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition that are manufactured, as defined in [section 3], and retained in Montana after October 1, 2009.
 
Freedom

This brings into focus that pesky question about who the foes of freedom and American life are: Those AK waving Islamic terrorists, foreign powers...or the Federal Government?


More please.
 
I think if I ever had to leave Maine for good, it would be for Montana. But I'd miss the ocean and its fresh-dug bivalves.

At least I wouldn't have to deal with the Route 1 speedbumps, er, tourists.
 
Why would they leave automatics out of it? To avoid being too good to be true?
 
Why would they leave automatics out of it? To avoid being too good to be true?
I think they did that to practice incrementalism. Full auto is a little more complicated especially considering the one liner in DC v. Heller.
 
Aside from Federal Law on Fullauto Firearms, MT Does not have any Further Procedures or Licenses.

The laws in MT Regarding FA Firearms:

45-8-302. Definitions. In 45-8-303 through 45-8-305 and 45-8-307, the following definitions apply:
(1) "Crime of violence" means any of the following crimes or an attempt to commit any of the crimes: any forcible felony, robbery, burglary, and criminal trespass.
(2) "Machine gun" means a firearm designed to discharge more than one shot by a single function of the trigger.
(3) "Person" includes a firm, partnership, association, or corporation.

45-8-303. Possession or use of machine gun in connection with a crime. Possession or use of a machine gun in the perpetration or attempted perpetration of a crime of violence is hereby declared to be a crime punishable by imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than 20 years.

45-8-304. Possession or use of machine gun for offensive purpose. Possession or use of a machine gun for offensive or aggressive purpose is hereby declared to be a crime punishable by imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than 10 years.

45-8-305. Presumption of offensive or aggressive purpose. Possession or use of a machine gun must be presumed to be for an offensive or aggressive purpose when the machine gun is in the possession of or used by a person who has been convicted of a crime of violence in any court of record, state or federal, in the United States of America or its territories or insular possessions.

45-8-307. Exceptions. Sections 45-8-301 through 45-8-305 and this section do not prohibit or interfere with:
(1) the manufacture of machine guns for and sale of machine guns to the military forces or the peace officers of the United States or of any political subdivision of the United States or transportation required for that purpose;
(2) the possession of a machine gun for a scientific purpose or the possession of a machine gun not usable as a weapon and possessed as a curiosity, ornament, or keepsake;
(3) the possession of a machine gun for a purpose manifestly not aggressive or offensive.
 
So I guess the Point of my post is that added Part:- - - - \/ - - - - - : is (or would be) negated by this law/\

NEW SECTION. Section 5. Exceptions. [Section 4] does not apply to:

(1) ;...............................................................

(2) ................................................................

(3) ...................................................................

(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Because there is provisions For it already.
 
Last edited:
The freedom to own firearms, I think, will eventually be an issue that will divide this country.

It's great to see a State taking a stand on this issue.
 
(4) a firearm that discharges two or more projectiles with one activation of the trigger or other firing device.

Doesn't that also exempt Shotguns, since they do discharge multiple projectiles with one activation of the trigger?


(2) "Firearms accessories" means items that are used in conjunction with or mounted upon a firearm but are not essential to the basic function of a firearm, including but not limited to telescopic or laser sights, magazines, flash or sound suppressors, ...

This seems like it might get by the federal $200 tax for suppressors. That might be worth a move to Montana :)
 
I spent alot of time in Montana (Glacier NP, Flathead Lake, Whitefish, Kalispell, Wisdom, Dillon) just out of college. Other than my home state of NH, it's the only other place I've ever called home. Montana literally takes your breath away. In my humble opinion, you haven't really visited "this country" until you've been to Montana. It embraces much of the American spirit that is lost to "days of yore" in firearm mysticism, hunting/trapping lore, big water, big fish, big outdoors. Montana IS AMERICA. Ask someone from Montana how they feel about California to really see a reaction.

I love Montana more than I can say, and this is just another reason why. Like my home state (at least until a few years ago), MT is very pro 2A, and I'm all for it!! Keep up the good work Montana!!!
 
I freaking love Montana. Here's a state that actually threatened to suceed from the union over the Smart ID. Now they tell Congress that they won't be obeying any AWB. I love Montana.
 
"Isn't Montana the one that said no to the Federal 55 speed limit rules too?"

The also said "no" to the Patriot Act.

If it wasn't for the fact that I can't find work there, I'd be there right now.
 
Why would they leave automatics out of it? To avoid being too good to be true?
To avoid having a throwdown with the feds right now. The purpose of this would seem to be to place a shot across the bow of fed.gov, and let them know that their actions will have a sticky consequence if they go down the AWB route again. Throwing in automatics would basically set them on a collision course right now.

Mike
 
what guage is an inch and a half?

IIRC, a 10 gauge is .75 caliber, so an inch and a half is way bigger than any shotgun in common use today.
 
I gotta say I am proud of my state.

One question for those with the relevant knowledge:

Is this Constitutionally grounded and what are the potential consequences if the Federal government decides it's not or wants to press the issue?
 
I would think that in a more honest country Montana wouldn't have to pass such legislation as the federal government would not be stepping on the Second Amendment. It is refreshing and great that Montana is doing this though it would kind of indicate that the states themselves can make their own unique gun laws in general. This is something in the US that I believe is dividing us to conquer us. I do hope it passes but I also hope that the federal government doesn't do what we fear. . .
 
I have posted a link to this story/proposed law to my state senator, as some thing for him to ponder for our state. It would be something else if this does become law in Montana, and more power to them.
sailortoo
 
There is zero chance Montana can exempt itself from U.S. firearms laws by claiming it is not interstate commerce. The firearms would have to be manufactured in Montana and the company could not conduct business in any other state. The steel used would have to have been mined in the state. The wood stock would have to have been from a Montana tree. The machines used to make the firearms would have to be build in Montana. The computers in the office would have to have been built in Montana. Any even if you could get past all that, the sale of the Montana-only firearms would have a ripple effect on the sale of firearms from manufacturers in other state so it would therefore be deemed interstate commerce.
 
There is zero chance Montana can exempt itself from U.S. firearms laws by claiming it is not interstate commerce. The firearms would have to be manufactured in Montana and the company could not conduct business in any other state. The steel used would have to have been mined in the state. The wood stock would have to have been from a Montana tree. The machines used to make the firearms would have to be build in Montana. The computers in the office would have to have been built in Montana. Any even if you could get past all that, the sale of the Montana-only firearms would have a ripple effect on the sale of firearms from manufacturers in other state so it would therefore be deemed interstate commerce.

That certainly is an abused clause, isn't it?
 
MAKster did you read the whole bill, this is addressed. . . "Generic and insignificant parts that have other manufacturing or consumer product applications are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition, and their importation into Montana and incorporation into a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition manufactured in Montana does not subject the firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition to federal regulation. It is declared by the legislature that basic materials, such as unmachined steel and unshaped wood, are not firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition and are not subject to congressional authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition under interstate commerce as if they were actually firearms, firearms accessories, or ammunition. The authority of congress to regulate interstate commerce in basic materials does not include authority to regulate firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition made in Montana from those materials." If the US government would see things differently is another story but it looks as if Montana is preparing for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top