Dionysusigma
Member
Almost everyone here carries a gun daily for self-defense and/or has a gun at home for defending one's property. Well, some (many) of us use guns that are seen by the Left as not "politically correct." Case in point, my SAR-1 (AK clone) is my HD gun.
So, what would be seen as PC? Would a SxS 12ga for home defense and a Glock 22 (or whatever your local police carry) be more "justifiable" in front of a jury? Would a .38 be more PC than a .380 semi-only Mac clone? Would a FN 5.7 loaded with hollowpoints be seen as worse than a CZ-52 loaded with ball?
Heck, even on that same line, would defending yourself using a halberd or Scottish claymore (in your home) be viewed better by a jury than using, say, an M1 Carbine?
And for those of you that have used a gun to defend yourself, and had to go on the stand, did it even really matter?
So, what would be seen as PC? Would a SxS 12ga for home defense and a Glock 22 (or whatever your local police carry) be more "justifiable" in front of a jury? Would a .38 be more PC than a .380 semi-only Mac clone? Would a FN 5.7 loaded with hollowpoints be seen as worse than a CZ-52 loaded with ball?
Heck, even on that same line, would defending yourself using a halberd or Scottish claymore (in your home) be viewed better by a jury than using, say, an M1 Carbine?
And for those of you that have used a gun to defend yourself, and had to go on the stand, did it even really matter?