Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Must have versions of an M1A?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Lucky Strike, Oct 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lucky Strike

    Lucky Strike Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    So i'm thinking about plunking down the cash on a M1A. Right now i'm thinking just the standard version which it seems you can get in the $1300 range. Just wondering if any of the other models that SA sells are worth the extra money for what they offer.

    I want something i can get 4 MOA groups with iron sights...i won't be adding any sort of foregrip, lights, etc to it. I may end up putting a scope but that would be about it.

    The Scout model is intriguing.....I want something I can hit targets at 500yds...is that doable with this model?
     
  2. jamesb

    jamesb Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Messages:
    201
    Location:
    Indianapolis, IN
    It would depend on what you intend to use it for and how much you intend to shoot it. If you are going to be using it for general plinking and take it out every couple of weekends or months I do not think you will see much difference in the models. If you are going to use it for a dedicated competition gun and shoot it everyweekend, get one of the national match models and prepared to drop some cash to keep it running, there is a reason all the service teams now shoot the AR. As far as 4 moa gun, most of them should do that out of the box if the shooter does their part. It also depends on the ammo you are going to run on it. I get pretty good groups using south african surplus out of my standard. 500 yard targets are doable with the scout model, so really, the choice between the scout and the standard, IMO is cosmetic. I was originally looking at a scout model but chose the standard because it fits the bill for the service rifle matches.
     
  3. Lucky Strike

    Lucky Strike Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    I don't plan on doing any competitions with it. Purely target shooting and as a defensive gun to protect my property if it ever came to that.

    You say the national match models need a lot of care to keep them running good.....is that also true with the standard/scout models? I'm wanting something very reliable so if those two need constant care maybe i'm looking at the wrong platform
     
  4. H2O MAN

    H2O MAN member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,438
    Location:
    USA
    18.0"

    Scout Squad or an old Bush rifle.
     
  5. Jason_G

    Jason_G Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,874
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Try to handle some before you buy. A lot of folks like the shorter barreled rifles, but to me the standard balances much better than the scout, bush, and SOCOM models. When you shoulder the standard, the sights are *right there* and everything is very natural. The Loaded is slightly front heavy, but still balances better than the shortys for me. I haven't been lucky enough to try out a Supermatch, M21, or Whitefeather yet, so I can't comment on those.

    Jason
     
  6. natescout

    natescout Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2008
    Messages:
    265
    Location:
    prescott, AZ
    I have the standard M1a and a scout/bush. I like the scout rifle a little better than my standard, just because its a little easier to get around .
     
  7. navajo

    navajo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    307
    Location:
    texas
    model

    I have a NM that is approaching 30 years old. Only thing I do to keep it running is clean it now and then. Still shoots one inch groups.
     
  8. longdayjake

    longdayjake Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,650
    Location:
    Genesee, ID
    My Loaded is an amazing rifle and shoots better than I can. And I can shoot really well. (internet bragging).
     
  9. J32A2

    J32A2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Messages:
    69
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Scout Squad!!!!!!!
     
  10. GILROY

    GILROY Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    164
    Scout. Resale is better also if you should be so inclined one day.
     
  11. Beagle-zebub

    Beagle-zebub Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    What does that mean? I've heard statements to that effect multiple times in reference to the M1A/M14.
     
  12. Dienekes

    Dienekes Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,905
    Location:
    Wyoming
    I went with a "loaded"? standard ten years ago; pretty much a stock GI rifle with medium hvy. barrel. Eventually had it glass bedded and with NM mods. Did some match shooting with it but most of my shooting has been 3-500 yard work on silhouettes in open country. With some 2K rounds through it the only "work" required has been replacement of the op rod spring, bolt springs, extractor and ejector. Those are pretty prosaic "fixes" and if I had not been getting slightly strange ejection out from under a new Smith mount I doubt I would have even done that much.

    Maybe a master class competitor would be putting more into a 10 year old M1A to stay right up there, but for what I do it's perfectly adequate.

    I much prefer the standard rifle for steadiness and balance.
     
  13. Gunfighter123

    Gunfighter123 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,473
    Location:
    IL/WIS State Line
    With the Scout or SOCOM , both should be able to hit a man/deer sized target at 500 yards with no problem.
    At 200 yards , I get "head-shot" size groups with my iron sited SOCOM -- 5 rds. , rapid fire , off sandbags.
    DSC00871.jpg
     
  14. glockman19

    glockman19 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,699
    IMHO, The Loaded is the best value for the money.
    I have a loaded and will be getting a Scout shortly.
     
  15. Al Thompson

    Al Thompson Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    8,847
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Ditto natescout. We have the same set-up and reached the same conclusion. :)
     
  16. Lucky Strike

    Lucky Strike Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Salem, OR
    thanks for all the suggestions....i'll probably be sticking to the standard or scout..just have to find some to handle so i can decide on which.

    my budding is trying to get me to go the AR15 route because of all the stuff you can get for them (especially with $1300) but there's something about the M1A and .308 that is appealing to me
     
  17. AK103K

    AK103K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    5,774
    If I had to buy just one, I'd get a standard grade full size rifle.

    I've owned all three "lengths", and still have a full size NM.

    There is really little difference between them except barrel length. They weigh basically the same. The shorter models, while a little handier, really dont offer much, if anything more.

    If you want a forward mounted scope or red dot, your better off with an Ultimak rail than the Springfield rail. Springfield swears the rail is mil spec (more like Weaver), mine wasnt, and any of the mil spec mounts I tried, three ARMS lever mounts, a set of ARMS rings, and a Larue lever mount would not fit properly, if at all. The LaRue lever mount has a double recoil block spaced to fit mil spec rails, and would not go on my SOCOM's rail. The Springfield rail is also made of steel and gets and stays hot.

    Some of the Springfield stocks, especially the synthetics, are a little shaky too. My SOCOM came with a poorly done over GI glass stock. Springfield swore (they swear a lot :) ) it wasnt, but you could see it wasnt as the paint quickly started chipping off from the ejected brass hitting it, the filled in selector notch, and where they ground off the checkering, which made the grip and forearm to narrow. On the other hand, do have some nice walnut stocks without the cut outs, and they also offer some nice walnut handguards to match, if you dont like the fiberglass.
     
  18. JR47

    JR47 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,414
    Location:
    N. Georgia
    The comment about spending money to keep them running usually refers to re-bedding the rifles periodically. This only applies to match rifles. I have an M1A1 that was produced in 1985, as a Class 3 weapon. It has shot well over 10K, with only the replacement of the recoil spring. I also own a 2004 Loaded that is into the 3K range without trouble.

    The rifles are rugged, accurate, and durable. The 7.62x51 loads are also known for turning cover into concealment.
     
  19. Vityaz

    Vityaz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    144
    Location:
    West Virginia
    I recommend going with the Loaded model. Good value for what you get.
     
  20. Retro

    Retro Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2005
    Messages:
    459
    Location:
    South East
    AK103K, yeah, my SOCOM rail wouldn't take ARMS scope mount either, it has too much play after installation. I had to use epoxy to fill in the gap and stop the play... but I have not shot it yet, not sure what barrel heat will do to the epoxy.
     
  21. Ringtail

    Ringtail Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    109
    I really like my SA Inc. Standard Loaded. The NM trigger makes it a lot easier to hit with. With Fed. GM match my sight in groups are less than 2 MOA out to 500 meters. Not bad for an out of the box iron sighted rifle.
     
  22. amprecon

    amprecon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,467
    Location:
    TN
    This is a 100 yard group I shot with my S.A. Standard M1A off a bench with the stock sights using 30 some year old surplus foreign ammo on a little windy day. I'm pretty happy with it.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2008
  23. MTMilitiaman

    MTMilitiaman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    2,690
    Location:
    Missoula, Montana
    I think the 18 inch barreled Scout version is probably the best balance of compactness and range available, and probably offers the most utility of any rifle available on the civilian market. Any version of the M1A should be easily capable of 4 MOA with just about anything you feed it. Even out of practice, my Loaded model will do about half of that with cheap 147 gr ball. With the 18 inch barrel, you only lose maybe 100 fps or so over the full length rifle, which is hardly noticeable at all but the most long range engagements. But the additional handiness is far more readily apparent to most. I love my full-size Loaded. The NM components I think are worth it and add to the shooting experience, but the rifle is a beast. Outdoors, this is of little consequence, but sometimes I wish I had gotten the Scout model. If I am able to afford another M1A before they are banned, it will be an 18 inch barreled rifle.

    Regardless of what you choose, I am sure you won't be disappointed. The M1A is a sweet shooting rifle that is about as durable, reliable, and maintenance free as is possible to be.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page