My brief search for a low-recoil .38 Special 158 LRN load

Status
Not open for further replies.

1KPerDay

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2006
Messages
20,871
Location
Happy Valley, UT
I'm planning on running my S&W 10-5 snub in an ICORE match later this month and have been practicing... call me a wuss if you like but with my "usual" load of 3.7 HP38 these 158 MBC #11s are pretty stout recoil wise. I imagine my stag grips hit my thumb bones in the wrong places. In any case, I tried to find a load that recoiled less but still hit close to POA at about 15-18 yds on steel (which is what I'll mostly be shooting).

Tried starting loads (or therabouts, based on starting loads from Lee and Hornady which vary greatly) with HP38, WST, Trail Boss, Bullseye and Unique. (attempted Red Dot and American Select but couldn't get consistent throws at starting charges in LCT/PAD so I gave up).

You can probably already guess the winner but I'll report below for any interested. All targets shot offhand at 18 yards. If I could hit 8" plates regularly I called it a success. I also shot at least 2 groups on large torso plates to judge relative accuracy and POI.

All loads are under 158 MBC #11 "cowboy" LRN, seated and crimped lightly to groove, CCI SPP.

I've never tried to build a load with these criteria before and I found it pretty interesting.

1. must be significantly lower recoil than my "standard" load.
2. must hit close to POA and be reasonably accurate.
3. Must use RN bullets to facilitate quicker loading with speedloaders.

4.0 Unique: similar recoil to 3.7 HP38 "standard" load, so not really seriously evaulated. Seemed reasonably accurate but not as good as other loads below.

2.8 Bullseye: recoil not light enough to recommend a change. Seemed moderately accurate and would work for a "plinking" load if I needed to use this powder.

3.3 WST: a bit lighter recoil than "standard", but not enough of a difference to impress. Seemed pretty accurate. Worth remembering for the future if low recoil is not the first priority. This powder is rapidly moving up the list of favorites due simply to its light grey color (easier to see the charge in the case) and excellent metering at smaller volumes. I could easily see this being my "only powder" for handgun use if I could find it regularly.

3.1 HP-38: Very accurate; in fact more consistently accurate than my current "standard" load. More evaluation in this regard would be warranted. Recoil noticeably lighter, and about the same as the WST load if maybe a bit lighter. Possibly the most accurate of all loads; maybe tied with Trail Boss. I'd have to shoot some groups on paper with each to be sure. Worth remembering. This may be my new "standard" range load for new shooters or where recoil is a concern. (If I don't have any WC loads made up.)

2.65-2.8 Trail Boss (that's as consistent as I could get with the PAD; I weighed nearly every charge with this load to be sure. Powders above drop very consistently.): The clear winner with regard to recoil. Surprisingly POA/POI seemed to be close enough, and accuracy was quite good, perhaps tying with 3.1 HP-38. Where high-volume low-recoil shooting with 158 RN is a priority, this is the clear choice of the loads I tried. I finally found a good use for Trail Boss.
 
1KPerDay said:
1. must be significantly lower recoil than my "standard" load.
2. must hit close to POA and be reasonably accurate.
3. Must use RN bullets to facilitate quicker loading with speedloaders.

I'd bump these three down 2 places. Top of the list would be that they have to make a power factor minimum (125,000 IIRC). For a 158gr bullet, that means they've got to chrono at ≥ 791fps. It's not hard to make this PF with a 158 bullet, but since you're going for "low recoil", I'd definitely chrono the load.

Second on the list would be "cleanliness". There are lots of reloads in ICORE, and a RN bullet profile is only one component to a good reload. The cases have to come out, and the rounds have to go in easily. Both can be hard to do with a gun quickly gunked up by dirty loads. Unfortunately, lead runs dirty (and smokey). I'd run plated bullets if I were you, but if you have to run lead, avoid powders that're particularly dirty with lead. And take a cleaning rod with you so you can go to a safe area between stages to swab out your chambers.

Good luck, and let us know how it goes!
 
Both good considerations, thanks. I did have to clean the chambers and barrel after only a hundred rounds or so... cases were starting to stick and rounds didn't want to go in sometimes.

in future (if this isn't a complete disaster, which it may definitely be; I'm pretty much trying this out just for fun) I will definitely run plated, but for now these are the only .358 pills I have and I want to use them up. Power factor isn't a consideration because this isn't a formal/sanctioned match and they don't chrono for these.

There are only 2 revolver division choices available at this small local match so I'll be shooting Limited against people with 8-shot, moon-clip revolvers. So I'm not going to be competitive in any case.
 
Trailboss is my go to for soft loads. after that I use Clays, and then 231.

With trail boss - I use 2.3 under a 148 HBWC and have run something like 500 through my smith 19 with minimal sign of getting dirty.

clays burns the next cleanest, I run about 3 grains, and then 231 which is the dirtiest of the 3 for me at 3.8 grains
 
2.8 of Bullseye has been the standard target load using 148 grain WC's for eons. The felt recoil can't get any less.
"...my "usual" load of 3.7 HP38..." Not surprising it's 'stout'. That's the max load for a cast 158 out of a 7.7" barrel. You work up the load or just pick it and hope?
In any case, if you want to reduce the felt recoil, you need to reduce the bullet weight. It's simple physics.
 
FWIW, my plinking/target shooting .38 spl loads all use AA#2. If you can get your hands on any, it's a good-metering fast powder with low recoil, clean combustion, and virtually no flash. Charge weights for 158 grains are in the mid 3's, so a little bit goes a long way (but you do have to watch out for double charges).
 
2.8 of Bullseye has been the standard target load using 148 grain WC's for eons. The felt recoil can't get any less.
"...my "usual" load of 3.7 HP38..." Not surprising it's 'stout'. That's the max load for a cast 158 out of a 7.7" barrel. You work up the load or just pick it and hope?
In any case, if you want to reduce the felt recoil, you need to reduce the bullet weight. It's simple physics.
I worked up. I realize it's max in some manuals. In previous evals it was pretty much the only load I could find that grouped well for me. I didn't have much choice in powders then.

I do sorta resent your snarky tone, however.:)

Also your "reduce bullet weight" mantra doesn't necessarily jibe with reality. Many people find that low charges of quick powders and heavy bullets produce the least felt recoil.

Certainly, given THE SAME BULLET WEIGHT and the same powder, a lighter charge will recoil less. I'm stupid but I'm not that stupid. :)
 
1KPerDay,
Sorry but it's not possible to get everything you want from the components you have right now. As you know the heavier bullet will produce more recoil than a lighter one. If you reduce the powder charge of course the felt recoil goes down but so does the pressure and the load don't burn all the lube well.

You are just going to have to settle for the best you can get from what you have. After you use up all the bullets you have I suggest the coated bullets from Missouri bullets. That will allow you to lower the charge weights without worrying about the soot from the lube.

In the mean time your best bet is probably using that 3.1gr charge of W231 or maybe a little lower as long as they rounds don't get too dirty. (and of course your sure all the bullets will leave the barrel)

Good luck finding something close to what you're looking for.
 
Sunray said:
In any case, if you want to reduce the felt recoil, you need to reduce the bullet weight. It's simple physics.

If you use a recoil calculator to compare the recoil when a 125gr & 158gr bullets are used to make the same power factor (125k), you'll see recoil impulse, velocity and energy are similar - in fact, they favor the heavier bullet a bit.

More to the point, though, a heavier bullet with a fast powder can easily feel noticeably softer than other loads. From what I've seen, heavy-for-caliber bullets are more popular than lighter bullets in action pistol games.
 
1KPerDay,
Sorry but it's not possible to get everything you want from the components you have right now. As you know the heavier bullet will produce more recoil than a lighter one. If you reduce the powder charge of course the felt recoil goes down but so does the pressure and the load don't burn all the lube well.

You are just going to have to settle for the best you can get from what you have. After you use up all the bullets you have I suggest the coated bullets from Missouri bullets. That will allow you to lower the charge weights without worrying about the soot from the lube.

In the mean time your best bet is probably using that 3.1gr charge of W231 or maybe a little lower as long as they rounds don't get too dirty. (and of course your sure all the bullets will leave the barrel)

Good luck finding something close to what you're looking for.
Thanks for the advice. :cool:
 
Meeting the ICORE PF with the starting charges you mentioned will be dicey with the snub. You'll need to work with a chronograph. As MrBorland said, you'll need to have an 158-grain bullet going 790 fps or so to reach the power factor.

Starting charges of Hodgdon Clays, Titegroup or IMR SR 4756 might be worth trying.

Stag grips? Maybe you could try some different grips to improve the handling and use a bit more HP-38 than 3.1 grains to reach power factor.
 
Last edited:
I'm planning on running my S&W 10-5 snub in an ICORE match later this month and have been practicing... call me a wuss if you like but with my "usual" load of 3.7 HP38 these 158 MBC #11s are pretty stout recoil wise. I imagine my stag grips hit my thumb bones in the wrong places. In any case, I tried to find a load that recoiled less but still hit close to POA at about 15-18 yds on steel (which is what I'll mostly be shooting).

Tried starting loads (or therabouts, based on starting loads from Lee and Hornady which vary greatly) with HP38, WST, Trail Boss, Bullseye and Unique. (attempted Red Dot and American Select but couldn't get consistent throws at starting charges in LCT/PAD so I gave up).

You can probably already guess the winner but I'll report below for any interested. All targets shot offhand at 18 yards. If I could hit 8" plates regularly I called it a success. I also shot at least 2 groups on large torso plates to judge relative accuracy and POI.

All loads are under 158 MBC #11 "cowboy" LRN, seated and crimped lightly to groove, CCI SPP.

I've never tried to build a load with these criteria before and I found it pretty interesting.

1. must be significantly lower recoil than my "standard" load.
2. must hit close to POA and be reasonably accurate.
3. Must use RN bullets to facilitate quicker loading with speedloaders.

4.0 Unique: similar recoil to 3.7 HP38 "standard" load, so not really seriously evaulated. Seemed reasonably accurate but not as good as other loads below.

2.8 Bullseye: recoil not light enough to recommend a change. Seemed moderately accurate and would work for a "plinking" load if I needed to use this powder.

3.3 WST: a bit lighter recoil than "standard", but not enough of a difference to impress. Seemed pretty accurate. Worth remembering for the future if low recoil is not the first priority. This powder is rapidly moving up the list of favorites due simply to its light grey color (easier to see the charge in the case) and excellent metering at smaller volumes. I could easily see this being my "only powder" for handgun use if I could find it regularly.

3.1 HP-38: Very accurate; in fact more consistently accurate than my current "standard" load. More evaluation in this regard would be warranted. Recoil noticeably lighter, and about the same as the WST load if maybe a bit lighter. Possibly the most accurate of all loads; maybe tied with Trail Boss. I'd have to shoot some groups on paper with each to be sure. Worth remembering. This may be my new "standard" range load for new shooters or where recoil is a concern. (If I don't have any WC loads made up.)

2.65-2.8 Trail Boss (that's as consistent as I could get with the PAD; I weighed nearly every charge with this load to be sure. Powders above drop very consistently.): The clear winner with regard to recoil. Surprisingly POA/POI seemed to be close enough, and accuracy was quite good, perhaps tying with 3.1 HP-38. Where high-volume low-recoil shooting with 158 RN is a priority, this is the clear choice of the loads I tried. I finally found a good use for Trail Boss.
If it's the recoil that's bothering you have you considered a pair of gloves to reduce felt recoil I bought a pair of bicycle riders gloves at Wallyworld to use when I shoot some heavy loads of .357 and .45LC. Just a thought.
 
I got confused in what bullets I would be using and loaded a few test rounds with 6.0 gr HS-6 and 125 Gr LRNFP, which should have been 158 gr LSWC. They shot quite soft from my 4" Service Six. The charge has been corrected to 7.0 gr for the 125 gr bullets, and another batch of test rounds is ready.I don't need "soft" but did seem to discover one worth trying for others. I have no data, and the accuracy was questionable. I only know that it was a soft load.
 
1K, if it will help solve your problem, you can borrow my chrono if you want. (I just skimmed over the thread maybe you have one). I dont ever get a chance to set it up, as my range trips are more like drive by shootings (only kidding- I just mean Im in and out with a quickness). Not sure what the shipping would cost but it should be cheaper than you having to buy one.
 
Really appreciate the offer, tater. :cool:

However, as I said earlier in the thread, power factor/velocity is a non-issue in this case.
 
The Trail Boss load looks like a winner. If you run out of that stuff, try the same amount ot Titewad (not Titegroup), e3, Red Dot, Clay Dot or Extra Lite. If power factor isn't required, "cast" some hot glue bullets by lubing up the mold, squirting hot melt glue into it and load them. Use a primer only and stuff the bullet all the way into the case. The bullets will pierce a paper shopping bag or one wall of a cardboard box.

No recoil.

100_5942.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top