My Favorite Rifle: M1A w/ 3-9x40 Nikon

Status
Not open for further replies.

Red State

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
340
Here is my M1A. It was a gift from my lovely wife and it is my favorite gun to shoot. The rifle doesn't have as many bells and whistles and dodads as some do, but I sure like how this gun is set up.

It started life as a Springfield Scout Squad and soon had a Burris 2.75x scout scope on it. It was a nice compact package and I hunted pigs with it this way, but I always wished that I had a little more magnification. Thus started the quest to mount a scope over the receiver and what a chore this turned out to be.

Because I didn't want to have to mess with a big cheek riser, I tried to keep the scope as low as possible relative to the bore. For this reason I chose the ARMS #18 design. After two trips to the range and about 80 rounds fired, the Blue Loctite seems to be doing its job and I have had no FTE issues that some people have mentioned when using the ARMS #18.

As you can probably tell from the pictures, the real challenge of keeping the scope low was maintaining clearance over the rear sight. A nice thing about this setup is that the rear sight is currently zeroed at 100yards and the scope still goes right over the top of it with about two millimeters of clearance.

Another challenge was finding a scope that would slide far enough back to match my natural cheek weld. As shown in the pictures, the scope turret housings are slid all the way up against the rear ring which is in the last slot on the rail. The Nikon Team Primos cleared the rear sight (when the sight was all the way depresed), but being a somewhat compact scope, there was not enough eye relief and I was always straining my neck forward trying to improve the sight picture. I switched to the Nikon Buckmaster 3-9x40 which is a long scope, and the occular lense reaches far enough back to meet my eye very comfortably.

Other scopes that would have worked as well are the Monarch 3-9x40 and the SII Big Sky 3-9x40: while not as elongated as the Buckmaster, both of these scopes have enough eye relief to provide flexible mounting options. The main thing is make sure that the power ring does not align directly above the rear sight, because if that happens, you will need higher rings. I stuck with 3-9x40 scopes because there seem to be so many good value options in that configuration. I will save the higher power scopes for a precision rifle that has a barrel that is longer than 18".

Speaking of rings, I really like the Burris Signature Selects. They are not very tactical and they don't come off very quickly, but they seem very sturdy. Also, I used the plastic inserts to adjust my piont of aim and it took exactly ONE CLICK on the scope to get dialed in at 100yard with 150grain FMJ.

Next up will be some accuracy testing with 168 and 175 HPBT.


Here is the setup with approximate prices:
M1A Scout Squad 18" Barrel with Muzzle Brake $1,600
Harris 9-13" Bipod mounted to a sling stud $70
Promag Heavy Duty Steel Scope Mount (same design as ARMS #18) $90
Burris Signature Select 1" Medium Rings $40
Nikon 3-9x40 Buckmaster w/ BDC Reticle $210
Beartooth slip-on 1/2" Cheek Riser $18
Fulton Armory Black Handguard $20

Future add ons include Butler Creek scope caps and a sling.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1969.jpg
    IMG_1969.jpg
    269.2 KB · Views: 230
  • IMG_1971.jpg
    IMG_1971.jpg
    273.7 KB · Views: 172
Looks like a well thought-out setup. In my experience, Nikon's BDC is a good match to the abilities of the M1A. Stock M1As are generally not MOA shooters. The holdover circles work well in this application.

I'm curious to the long-term performance of the ProMag mount; does it hold zero, etc. I don't know if it's been out long enough for there to be reviews circulating about it.
 
Nice setup!!! I love that rifle. With your setup, I bet you could easily "collapse" your PVC target stands at the end of great morning at the range.
 
Thanks for the comments, guys.

Borica, you make a couple of good points.

I tried to get one of the old Smith Weaver mounts for $125, but they were discontinued. I decided to try the Promag mount after talking with a guy at perfectunion who had used his for over a year with no problems. It is SOLID steel, so I fully expect it to last a long time. I got it at midway, so I know that I can return it if it won't hold zero. Heaven knows that I used pently of Blue Loctite.

A friend once shot a sub MOA group with this gun when it had the scout scope on it - something I was never able to do. I am curious to find out if that was a fluke or if I can somewhat duplicate that performance. After a good bore cleaning, I will start some accuracy testing. Frankly, I would be pretty thrilled with 1.5 moa.

I like the Nikon BDC in general, but particularly for this rifle. The .308 out of an 18" barrel is not as flat shooting as - say a 30.06 out of a 22" barrel. So the cirlces work well as aiming references because in addition to the center of the circles, the tops and bottoms can work as added reference points while the bullet is dropping.

So far I have determined that with a 100 yard zero, clay pigeons in the 1st circle are not safe at 200 yards. I need to do a lot more experimenting with this to find my aming points for different ranges, but first I need to find my best load. If anyone has input regarding what load shoots the best out of their 18" M1A, I would love to hear it.
 
I agree with you on all accounts. With regards to real accuracy, we come to the debate over how many shots constitute a proper measure of it. On several occasions I have shot 1" 3-shot groups with my Standard full size (scoped, with the factory load that it likes). When shooting 5-shot groups that opens up to 1.5" and the best 10-shot group I achieved was around 2" with a regular factory load. A lot of folks would say that 10 shots is the magic number and that makes sense. The load that my full size rifle likes is the Federal Powershock 150gr JSPs. I have not yet tried Federal GMM, but would like to sometime soon.

You are spot-on regarding the BDC reference points.

Here's the 10 shots at 100 yards with the Federal Powershock:

m1agroup.jpg
 
Nikon has a "computer" on their website for the BDC. I have found that it has accurate information. Of course, I only knew about it AFTER I needed it. LOL You might want to check it out. The information it gave me was dead on for what I had already found out by shooting at least 200 rounds. This is only out to 350 yards though. That's as long as my range gets. At the very least it will give you a good starting point.
 
Apparently my editing skills were poor. edited post appears below.
 
Last edited:
I'll chime in for both the glories of the M1A and the Nikon 3x9. The M1A is a great weapon.
As for the scope, it is a bit longer story. I Bought a Nikon 3x9 in ther Buckmaster series last fall. I tried it out on a few of my rifles. At the begining of Deer season I installed it on a Tikka 6.5x55 Swede. I had the opportunity to shoot a nice doe and a nice buck. The buck came at dusk...the kind of low light we all concern ourselves with . He went down and the sun followed almost as fast. I waited the obligatory 30 minutes to let him bleed out. I am particular forced to do this because I am color blind and as such I have great difficulty trailing wounded animals...(red and green often appear the same to me). Now the point of my story, I pulled out my medium quality packing binoculars to watch the deer which was well hidden in the tree line after I shot him . When I looked through the binoc's it was almost pitch black..i could see nothing, I put the Nikon scope back on him and my sight picture was nearly full daylight. I am completely sold on whatever it is Nikon does with their lens coating. It is nothing short of astounding. The Nikon Buckmaster has about 93% light retention and their next step up, the Monarch series, has 2 % greater ability while their next step down has about 2-3 % less ability. Folks let me tell you these scopes are great "bangs for the bucks".

As a side note check out Nikon's BDC, Bullet Drop Compensator web page. There one is able to input the caliber, bullet weight etc.. and determine exactly how to use their BDC reticles for hold over at specific ranges. http://www.nikonhunting.com/riflescopes-bdc-reticle.html
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top